[Proposal] More Feeders

[The Python]

With Cormac's thread on removing GCR eject buttons, I'm still convinced that more feeders is a better solution than removing eject buttons in GCCR's. Another thing which would be a good idea (which someone else proposed) is removing eject buttons in GCR's but only for like 1 week per year.

[Esthe]

With Cormac's thread on removing GCR eject buttons, I'm still convinced that more feeders is a better solution than new GCR's. Another thing which would be a good idea (which someone else proposed) is removing eject buttons in GCR's but only for like 1 week per year.

What would be the point o& removing them for a period that short?

[Galiantus III]

I'm still convinced that more feeders is a better solution than new GCR's.

I'm at a loss what this means, and I'm thinking there's a typo. Do you mean "still not convinced? And when we talk about new GCRs, aren't we generally talking about more feeders?

[The Python]

I'm still convinced that more feeders is a better solution than new GCR's.

I'm at a loss what this means, and I'm thinking there's a typo. Do you mean "still not convinced? And when we talk about new GCRs, aren't we generally talking about more feeders?

Ope yeah, typo, meant more feeders is a better solution than removing ban buttons xD

[Flanderlion]

It's been discussed before, but essentially this is a short term increase of activity, and long term takes activity from UCRs and moves them into GCRs. Build better UCRs, not more GCRs.

[Wabbitslayah]

It's been discussed before, but essentially this is a short term increase of activity, and long term takes activity from UCRs and moves them into GCRs. Build better UCRs, not more GCRs.

Not only that, but do this: viewtopic.php?p=38784609#p38784609

[Kylia Quilor]

Harder (not impossible, harder) to build better UCRs when the existing GCRs due to their size, grab a lot of the oxygen - size breeds size, activity draws in activity. Distributing the crop of new nations better will lead to a rebalancing, reducing the size (and thus stability) of existing GCRs, and open breathing space for UCRs as well as aspiring new GCR politicians. Eventually a new equilibrium will be reached, but it will probably be a better equilibrium than have now. Certainly won't be worse.

[Cormactopia Prime]

I think I would only support the addition of more Feeders now if it were also paired with Democracy/Autocracy so nations would spawn in UCRs. Otherwise, I think you end up with the problem others have mentioned, activity drain from UCRs to the new Feeders, without any corresponding benefit for UCRs.

I do think doing both at once would finally balance Feeders with the Sinkers and UCRs in such a way that it would make for more balanced and dynamic gameplay.

[Flanderlion]

I think I would only support the addition of more Feeders now if it were also paired with Democracy/Autocracy so nations would spawn in UCRs. Otherwise, I think you end up with the problem others have mentioned, activity drain from UCRs to the new Feeders, without any corresponding benefit for UCRs.

I do think doing both at once would finally balance Feeders with the Sinkers and UCRs in such a way that it would make for more balanced and dynamic gameplay.

I do think any new Feeders should be venters instead - just as it adds something new/constant drama for interregional politics rather than the same old. Plus allows a new theme. That said, I'm for it only with unlimited dev time as like there are so many small features that'd help the game more if it's a choice between.