by Fexia » Mon Apr 05, 2010 8:51 am
by Hassett » Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:36 am
by North Mack » Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:01 am
by Pythagosaurus » Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:22 am
North Mack wrote:As a general rule, png is better quality, bmp / jpeg is better sized, ...
by North Mack » Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:38 am
Pythagosaurus wrote:Uh, no. As a general rule, png has better compression for images with a smallish number of colors, and jpeg has better compression (although with some loss) for images with a large number of colors (e.g. photographs and some fancy gradients).
Pythagosaurus wrote:bmp is not related to jpeg, cannot be used on the web, and has no compression whatsoever.
by Pythagosaurus » Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:59 am
by Bluth Corporation » Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:56 pm
by Ambassador Ratatoskr » Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:58 pm
by Rolamec » Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:01 pm
Fexia wrote:I need help? I have been trying to upload a flag for my nation from illustrator. The thing is it is too large. How do i reduce the size to meat NS requirements? Can you help me?
by Bluth Corporation » Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:04 pm
by Bluth Corporation » Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:12 pm
Ambassador Ratatoskr wrote: Images for the Internet are always saved at 72 dpi.
Also note that no matter what operating system you use, there are TWO file size numbers. One is "size on disk" which includes data that doesn't get uploaded when you change your flag
by Ambassador Ratatoskr » Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:24 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Also note that no matter what operating system you use, there are TWO file size numbers. One is "size on disk" which includes data that doesn't get uploaded when you change your flag
Not really, no. Modern drives and filesystems don't assign individual bytes to files--doing so is horribly space-inefficient, in terms of the amount of storage space that must be devoted to storing filesystem structure metadata vs. storing actual data itself. Instead, the drive is divided up into clusters of bytes, and so the filesystem only has to index individual clusters--which, since they represent (usually) several thousand bytes, can be indexed and tracked with much less data, so instead of having 1024 separate indices for 1024 bytes, I only need one index for a single 1024-byte cluster. A given file is allocated a certain number of clusters, and new clusters are only allocated for that file (or deallocated) if the file grows or shrinks past a cluster boundary. The "size on disk" is the total number of bytes in all the clusters allocated to the file.
by Bluth Corporation » Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:35 pm
Ambassador Ratatoskr wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:Also note that no matter what operating system you use, there are TWO file size numbers. One is "size on disk" which includes data that doesn't get uploaded when you change your flag
Not really, no. Modern drives and filesystems don't assign individual bytes to files--doing so is horribly space-inefficient, in terms of the amount of storage space that must be devoted to storing filesystem structure metadata vs. storing actual data itself. Instead, the drive is divided up into clusters of bytes, and so the filesystem only has to index individual clusters--which, since they represent (usually) several thousand bytes, can be indexed and tracked with much less data, so instead of having 1024 separate indices for 1024 bytes, I only need one index for a single 1024-byte cluster. A given file is allocated a certain number of clusters, and new clusters are only allocated for that file (or deallocated) if the file grows or shrinks past a cluster boundary. The "size on disk" is the total number of bytes in all the clusters allocated to the file.
I think we're agreeing here. "Size on disk" is what it's called in OSX, which is a flavor of Linux.
But the same principle you describe applies to nearly every OS. The number associated allocated clusters is nearly always a larger number than the actual data contained in an image when assembled for upload.
by Ambassador Ratatoskr » Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:50 pm
by Bears Armed » Tue Apr 06, 2010 5:35 am
Ambassador Ratatoskr wrote:The NS flag limitation of file size of < 10kb
by Mayor For Life » Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:54 am
by Fexia » Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:19 am
by The Tofu Islands » Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:26 pm
Fexia wrote:Can i find some one to make a flag for me?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Baltinica, Javrad, Radicalania, Riemstagrad, The Southern Dependencies
Advertisement