Issue #995 despite having vat grown citizens

[Aristokuvaa]

My nation has the No Sex/vat grown citizens policy, and i just got issue #995 "A Cup Runneth Over" which specifically deals with mothers having biological sex and children to cheat welfare, which doesnt make much sense.

apologies if this is the wrong place to post about this

[Land Without Shrimp]

This is the topic you want. You can post your concern/issue there and they'll take a look at it.

[Sacara]

This is the topic you want. You can post your concern/issue there and they'll take a look at it.

I think you mean this thread.

[Land Without Shrimp]

This is the topic you want. You can post your concern/issue there and they'll take a look at it.

I think you mean this thread.

Well that's embarrassing!! Thanks for the correction.

[Aristokuvaa]

I considered that thread but thats specifically for spelling and grammar isnt it?

Is this what validities is?

[Frisbeeteria]

I think you mean this thread.

Nope. They were right the first time.

I considered that thread but thats specifically for spelling and grammar isnt it?

The very first line in the first thread linked is

This thread is for players to report when issues gave unexpected stat effects.

Issue validities qualify as a stat effect. That's the proper place.

[Daynor King]

I considered that thread but thats specifically for spelling and grammar isnt it?

The very first line in the first thread linked is

This thread is for players to report when issues gave unexpected stat effects.

Issue validities qualify as a stat effect. That's the proper place.

From the other thread:

Please use this thread only for reporting visible objective errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation and for suspected problems with validities, macros and the like.

[Trotterdam]

More straightforwardly: use the "help us fix old issues" thread for stuff that's visibly wrong before you answer the issue. Use the "unusual issue effects" thread for stuff that only turns out to be wrong after you answer the issue (or at least obtain reliable data on what happened after someone else answered the issue).

[Sacara]

More straightforwardly: use the "help us fix old issues" thread for stuff that's visibly wrong before you answer the issue. Use the "unusual issue effects" thread for stuff that only turns out to be wrong after you answer the issue (or at least obtain reliable data on what happened after someone else answered the issue).

The very first line in the first thread linked is

Issue validities qualify as a stat effect. That's the proper place.

From the other thread:

Please use this thread only for reporting visible objective errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation and for suspected problems with validities, macros and the like.

Thanks for backing me up.

More importantly, make sure to report it to the thread I linked if you wish to see this problem addressed and hopefully fixed.

[Luna Amore]

Fixed it.

[My little paranoid]

More straightforwardly: use the "help us fix old issues" thread for stuff that's visibly wrong before you answer the issue. Use the "unusual issue effects" thread for stuff that only turns out to be wrong after you answer the issue (or at least obtain reliable data on what happened after someone else answered the issue).

What if it's both?

[Trotterdam]

What if it's both?

You know, the editors do read both threads. If it's really that hard to tell where something belongs you can just post it in your best guess. Worst thing that can happen is that people will get mildly annoyed at you and point you in the right direction.

Also, this is drifting from the original topic of the thread. It actually took me a few moments to realize that Luna Amore's "fixed it" was referring to the actual issue validity problem from the original post, rather than the which-is-the-correct-thread confusion that we hijacked the thread over.