Suggestion: New Nation Rank Category: Most Nations Ejected

[The New California Republic]

On another note, full support, always looking for more statistics to look at

Even in light of all the various issues with it that have been pointed out?

[Pergamon]

That's pretty much a deal breaker then.

A different way to measure this might be to have a stat for how much influence has been spent on ejecting/banning nations from the region. Then it would be senseless to use puppet-flooding as a method to abuse the stat.

Influence spent. That actually sounds interesting.

[Lord Dominator]

A different way to measure this might be to have a stat for how much influence has been spent on ejecting/banning nations from the region. Then it would be senseless to use puppet-flooding as a method to abuse the stat.

Influence spent. That actually sounds interesting.

Seems reasonable to count nations with no influence, like the just-founded ones you so enjoy whacking, as one influence each.

[Jar Wattinree]

World Census staff calculated the amount of sanctions and diplomatic threats to determine how many nations were expelled per Officer

[Merconitonitopia]

the census only makes sense if it applies to most nations. 99.99% of nations have never and will never eject a nation, putting them at 0, so you could be put anywhere from 100% to 0.1% with the same data.

[Maltropia]

the census only makes sense if it applies to most nations. 99.99% of nations have never and will never eject a nation, putting them at 0, so you could be put anywhere from 100% to 0.1% with the same data.

"Most World Assembly Endorsements." Just under 15% of nations are WA members.

[VoVoDoCo]

On another note, full support, always looking for more statistics to look at

Even in light of all the various issues with it that have been pointed out?

Measuring influence spent rather than the actual quantity of ejections assuages many of those issues imo.

[Aclion]

the census only makes sense if it applies to most nations. 99.99% of nations have never and will never eject a nation, putting them at 0, so you could be put anywhere from 100% to 0.1% with the same data.

Only really an issue if there was going to be a least nations ejected stat.

[Unibot III]

I'm in favour of this idea. It's hilarious.

[Leutria]

the census only makes sense if it applies to most nations. 99.99% of nations have never and will never eject a nation, putting them at 0, so you could be put anywhere from 100% to 0.1% with the same data.

Only really an issue if there was going to be a least nations ejected stat.

Although, you currently get people complaining about being in the top 10% of WA endorsements despite not being in the WA. Imagine how many more complaints (or rather, ‘bug reports’) from people who are in the top 10%, maybe even 5% of nations ejected despite never having ejected a nation.

[Galiantus III]

I've got an idea: only list this stat for WA delegates. We have already discussed being able to sort the WA delegates page by number of endorsements, and this could just be another stat to rank them by. The unfortunate thing is this would exclude ROs, though.

[Lord Dominator]

I've got an idea: only list this stat for WA delegates. We have already discussed being able to sort the WA delegates page by number of endorsements, and this could just be another stat to rank them by. The unfortunate thing is this would exclude ROs, though.

I was thinking that it be a Stat either limited to those who have ejected, or just doesn't rank those who haven't. Like everyone who hasn't would automatically be top 100%, and 1-99% would be those who have ejected.

[Galiantus III]

That would be a good way to do it. Of course, if we did that, would we then expect Admin to do the same for WA endorsements? Because that would make more sense than the current system.

[Aclion]

I've got an idea: only list this stat for WA delegates. We have already discussed being able to sort the WA delegates page by number of endorsements, and this could just be another stat to rank them by. The unfortunate thing is this would exclude ROs, though.

I was thinking that it be a Stat either limited to those who have ejected, or just doesn't rank those who haven't. Like everyone who hasn't would automatically be top 100%, and 1-99% would be those who have ejected.

If that's a thing that can be done then I'd like to see it for world assembly endorsements. But for tracking ejections it's more complicated. A nation may become a world assemble delegate, eject some people, and then lose the position. Would they still be tracked? If so you'd have to track everyone who'd ever been one, which leads to the same issue; or check if their influence spent is >0. And even then you'd only be getting the delegate, not the BC officers.

Only really an issue if there was going to be a least nations ejected stat.

Although, you currently get people complaining about being in the top 10% of WA endorsements despite not being in the WA. Imagine how many more complaints (or rather, ‘bug reports’) from people who are in the top 10%, maybe even 5% of nations ejected despite never having ejected a nation.

I guess.
Never really saw people complaining about stuff like that as an issue.

[Lord Dominator]

I was thinking that it be a Stat either limited to those who have ejected, or just doesn't rank those who haven't. Like everyone who hasn't would automatically be top 100%, and 1-99% would be those who have ejected.

If that's a thing that can be done then I'd like to see it for world assembly endorsements. But for tracking ejections it's more complicated. A nation may become a world assemble delegate, eject some people, and then lose the position. Would they still be tracked? If so you'd have to track everyone who'd ever been one, which leads to the same issue; or check if their influence spent is >0. And even then you'd only be getting the delegate, not the BC officers.

I don't see any reason to stop tracking those who've lost the ability to eject. Keep in mind, my idea has no limits on who is ranked other than a separation between those who have ejected and those who haven't.

[Aclion]

If that's a thing that can be done then I'd like to see it for world assembly endorsements. But for tracking ejections it's more complicated. A nation may become a world assemble delegate, eject some people, and then lose the position. Would they still be tracked? If so you'd have to track everyone who'd ever been one, which leads to the same issue; or check if their influence spent is >0. And even then you'd only be getting the delegate, not the BC officers.

I don't see any reason to stop tracking those who've lost the ability to eject. Keep in mind, my idea has no limits on who is ranked other than a separation between those who have ejected and those who haven't.

It would make the ranking overrepresent ejections by quite a lot to exclude so many nations that could eject but haven't.

[Galiantus III]

I don't see any reason to stop tracking those who've lost the ability to eject. Keep in mind, my idea has no limits on who is ranked other than a separation between those who have ejected and those who haven't.

It would make the ranking overrepresent ejections by quite a lot to exclude so many nations that could eject but haven't.

How about if we include those who either have ejected, or who are currently in a position to eject, and exclude nations that were in a position to eject but didn't?