Lenlyvit wrote:*bump*
Can we possibly discuss the possibility of Unibot's idea to give regions feeder status through an SC vote? I think it might have merit, especially after I saw the other thread >_>
I don't think that was my idea.
Advertisement
by Unibot III » Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:25 pm
Lenlyvit wrote:*bump*
Can we possibly discuss the possibility of Unibot's idea to give regions feeder status through an SC vote? I think it might have merit, especially after I saw the other thread >_>
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Lenlyvit » Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:30 pm
by Lenlyvit » Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:31 pm
by Galiantus III » Fri Jan 26, 2018 6:03 pm
Lenlyvit wrote:But yeah, I think a possible SC vote to give a UCR feeder status might be an interesting idea.
Frisbeeteria wrote:For some reason I have a mental image of a dolphin, trying to organize a new pod of his fellow dolphins to change the course of a nuclear sub. It's entertaining, I'll give ya that.
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Fauxia » Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:21 pm
by Tim-Opolis » Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:45 pm
Lenlyvit wrote:*bump*
Can we possibly discuss the possibility of Unibot's idea to give regions feeder status through an SC vote? I think it might have merit, especially after I saw the other thread >_>
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Lenlyvit » Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:33 pm
by Roavin » Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:44 pm
by Galiantus III » Fri Feb 02, 2018 6:26 pm
Lenlyvit wrote:Has anyone ever given Condemnations a thought? Like side-effects and stuff? What if a Condemnation locked someone's WA status to the condemned nation, so they could no longer switch WA status?
Frisbeeteria wrote:For some reason I have a mental image of a dolphin, trying to organize a new pod of his fellow dolphins to change the course of a nuclear sub. It's entertaining, I'll give ya that.
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Clean Land » Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:31 am
Preserve
A resolution preventing a region from ceasing to exist. Incompatible with Liberation and Appoint Supervisor
Appoint Supervisor
A resolution to appoint a nation the Supervisor of a region. The supervisor, upon passage, is removed from the regional banlist, cannot be banned or ejected by anyone except the executive Founder, and their posts can only be supressed by the executive Founder. Incompatible with Liberation and Preserve.
by Lenlyvit » Tue Mar 27, 2018 2:07 pm
Clean Land wrote:Ok here are two more possibilities:Preserve
A resolution preventing a region from ceasing to exist. Incompatible with Liberation and Appoint Supervisor
Now you can lock down a region with an incredibly complex password, and then let the SC make it permanent, if the natives want it.
This also can used to prevent refounds... but because it is incompatible with Liberations it cannot fully prevent a region from being a trophy region.
(and of course it can also be used offensively)Appoint Supervisor
A resolution to appoint a nation the Supervisor of a region. The supervisor, upon passage, is removed from the regional banlist, cannot be banned or ejected by anyone except the executive Founder, and their posts can only be supressed by the executive Founder. Incompatible with Liberation and Preserve.
The catch here is obviously that the Supervisor has no access to a secret password, so they cannot go past any passwords they don't know.
by Galiantus III » Tue Mar 27, 2018 3:41 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:For some reason I have a mental image of a dolphin, trying to organize a new pod of his fellow dolphins to change the course of a nuclear sub. It's entertaining, I'll give ya that.
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Lord Dominator » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:46 am
Galiantus III wrote:I don't think condemnations and commendations should have effects, as then you run into the question of what that would mean for past proposals. Any discussion surrounding adding affects to SC proposals should introduce them as new categories, not modifications to things already in use.
by Aclion » Thu Mar 29, 2018 12:03 am
Galiantus III wrote:I don't think condemnations and commendations should have effects, as then you run into the question of what that would mean for past proposals. Any discussion surrounding adding affects to SC proposals should introduce them as new categories, not modifications to things already in use.
by Galiantus III » Thu Mar 29, 2018 5:32 pm
Aclion wrote:Galiantus III wrote:I don't think condemnations and commendations should have effects, as then you run into the question of what that would mean for past proposals. Any discussion surrounding adding affects to SC proposals should introduce them as new categories, not modifications to things already in use.
Depending on the specifics of how it's coded it might not apply to old proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:For some reason I have a mental image of a dolphin, trying to organize a new pod of his fellow dolphins to change the course of a nuclear sub. It's entertaining, I'll give ya that.
Ballotonia wrote:Testing is for sissies. The actual test is to see how many people complain when any change is made ;)
by Lord Dominator » Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:13 am
by Lenlyvit » Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:56 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Man this is annoying me, but I noticed that 'possibilities' in the title is spelled wrong
by Fauxia » Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:00 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Man this is annoying me, but I noticed that 'possibilities' in the title is spelled wrong
by Kuriko » Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:25 pm
Fauxia wrote:Lord Dominator wrote:Man this is annoying me, but I noticed that 'possibilities' in the title is spelled wrong
Hey I said it two months before you!
by United Massachusetts » Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:53 pm
by Azadistan-land of the free » Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:55 pm
by Kuriko » Thu Aug 30, 2018 1:58 pm
Azadistan-land of the free wrote:I think there should be a type of resolution called Peacekeeping Mission authorising WA nations to send troops to a specific nation or region.
by United Massachusetts » Thu Aug 30, 2018 2:00 pm
Kuriko wrote:Azadistan-land of the free wrote:I think there should be a type of resolution called Peacekeeping Mission authorising WA nations to send troops to a specific nation or region.
How would that work though? We already have military gameplay where any nation can go anywhere. What are your thoughts?
by United Massachusetts » Thu Aug 30, 2018 2:01 pm
by Kuriko » Thu Aug 30, 2018 2:11 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bali Kingdom, Countriopia, Tamocordia, Trotterdam
Advertisement