Queue -> Vote

by **Imperium Anglorum** » Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:02 pm

This SC resolution has some 175 approvals and did not go to vote at the Monday major update as expected. Why is this the case?

https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1487470463

by **Christian Democrats** » Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:08 pm

That's strange. Proposal holds are being tested in the General Assembly right now.

by **Imperium Anglorum** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:58 am

Christian Democrats wrote:That's strange. Proposal holds are being tested in the General Assembly right now.

If it is currently being held, then there should be something which says that it is being held. That doesn't appear to currently be the case.

by **Mallorea and Riva** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:06 am

Imperium Anglorum wrote:
Christian Democrats wrote:That's strange. Proposal holds are being tested in the General Assembly right now.

If it is currently being held, then there should be something which says that it is being held. That doesn't appear to currently be the case.

That's the thing, it isn't being held. That's a SC proposal, and CD is correct in saying that we're only testing the GA right now... Unless a techie flipped the wrong switch when implementing the SC code... In which case the hamsters are probably trying to turn their wheels, but they're locked in place. I'll flag this for attention.

by **Unibot III** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:10 am

It's more than that. The SC is on hold, but the "All Proposals" filter is only showing 'Discarded' proposals (council=0) - and not the proposals active in the GA (council=1) and SC (council=2).

by **[violet]** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:05 pm

I'm looking into it.

by **[violet]** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:26 pm

This should be fixed now, so the proposal will reach the voting floor next update.

by **Drasnia** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:11 pm

[violet] wrote:This should be fixed now, so the proposal will reach the voting floor next update.

Are you allowed to disclose why this happened in the first place? Does it have anything to do with the hold function in the GA?

by **Imperium Anglorum** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 6:13 pm

Drasnia wrote:
[violet] wrote:This should be fixed now, so the proposal will reach the voting floor next update.

Are you allowed to disclose why this happened in the first place? Does it have anything to do with the hold function in the GA?

I too am curious.

by **[violet]** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:49 pm

Drasnia wrote:Are you allowed to disclose why this happened in the first place? Does it have anything to do with the hold function in the GA?

Yes, although not directly. I changed a function and didn't realize the daily update had some ancient code that relied on that function acting in an unintuitive way. As a result, it looked at the wrong proposals when trying to judge whether there was anything ready to promote.

by **Lower Columbian WA Mission** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:22 pm

Twenty minutes into the first update after [v] said it was fixed, and the proposal in question is still in queue. Methinks the brakes are still on those hamster wheels...

by **Greater Tern** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:07 pm

Lower Columbian WA Mission wrote:Twenty minutes into the first update after [v] said it was fixed, and the proposal in question is still in queue. Methinks the brakes are still on those hamster wheels...

There's an active GA resolution now which I don't remember having quorum. Maybe the fix was applied on the wrong WA chamber?

EDIT: Aaaand it's gone.
EDIT2: SC resolution is now up for vote!

by **[violet]** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:13 pm

Shh bby is ok

by **HMS Unicorn** » Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:18 pm

The new vote hasn't triggered the WA notification about voting, at least not on my nation - and I haven't voted on it.

by **[violet]** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:02 am

HMS Unicorn wrote:The new vote hasn't triggered the WA notification about voting, at least not on my nation - and I haven't voted on it.

This won't be fixed because it's about eight layers deep in the unholy bugstorm I unleashed today.

by **Christian Democrats** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:03 am

[violet] wrote:
HMS Unicorn wrote:The new vote hasn't triggered the WA notification about voting, at least not on my nation - and I haven't voted on it.

This won't be fixed because it's about eight layers deep in the unholy bugstorm I unleashed today.

I have the notification.

by **[violet]** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:34 am

Yes, most people will, but not everyone.

by **Imperium Anglorum** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 12:57 am

[violet] wrote:Yes, most people will, but not everyone.

How is that determined? I don't have it.

by **Flanderlion** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:12 am

Imperium Anglorum wrote:
[violet] wrote:Yes, most people will, but not everyone.

How is that determined? I don't have it.

I'm guessing the notification is from the GA thing, and those who clicked on it to see the GA bit didn't get the notification, while those who didn't check while "Gun Control Act" was at vote still have a notification, and open it to see the SC vote. Could be completely off here.

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:55 pm

SC queue may still be a bit buggy? According to my screen there have been zero proposals awaiting approval since this morning (GMT), yet just saw this:

21/02/2017, 21:38:02: The proposal "Commend Evansvill" was removed from the floor.

by **Reploid Productions** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:11 pm

[violet] wrote:
HMS Unicorn wrote:The new vote hasn't triggered the WA notification about voting, at least not on my nation - and I haven't voted on it.

This won't be fixed because it's about eight layers deep in the unholy bugstorm I unleashed today.

o/~ Ninety-nine bugs in the code for the site
Ninety-nine bugs in the code
Take one down, patch it on out
Two hundred bugs in the code for the site ~/o

by **[violet]** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:30 pm

Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:SC queue may still be a bit buggy? According to my screen there have been zero proposals awaiting approval since this morning (GMT), yet just saw this:

21/02/2017, 21:38:02: The proposal "Commend Evansvill" was removed from the floor.

I don't see the problem... a proposal was lodged and then removed by a moderator.

by **Tinhampton** » Tue Feb 21, 2017 3:44 pm

I have the notification on the Century theme, but it's in regular (not in bold).

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:16 am

[violet] wrote:
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:SC queue may still be a bit buggy? According to my screen there have been zero proposals awaiting approval since this morning (GMT), yet just saw this:

21/02/2017, 21:38:02: The proposal "Commend Evansvill" was removed from the floor.

I don't see the problem... a proposal was lodged and then removed by a moderator.

Sorry [violet], I should have been clearer - the notification of removal appeared to come many hours after the act of removal.

The proposal was flagged by Todd in the Illegals thread in the SC forum early morning my time. When I looked for it a couple of hours later it was not in the SC proposals list, so it appeared to have been removed. The notification appeared about 12 hours after I looked for the proposal. I can't see that it was re-submitted either.

Anyway, the system seems to be working properly now. Just wanted to clarify.

Queue -> Vote

Queue -> Vote

Who is online