New SC catogorys?

[JURISDICTIONS]

I have an Idea!

You know how people are creating regions and nations in order to make a resolution about a topic like A mean old man's
"Condemn Shitty Proposal Writing".

My question to Mods and Admins: Is it possible in the SC... to make a proposal type....that can condemn "Topics" and not "Regions" or "Nations"?

"Topics" being the above example: "Condemn Shitty Proposal Writing"

What does everyone think?

[Flibbleites]

And what effect should a condemnation of a topic have?

[JURISDICTIONS]

There would be a list and it would show that the certain "topic" has been condemned or commended or liberated. More or less that it could show the opinion of the WA through the SC how it feels on a particular subject.

[Omigodtheykilledkenny]

How do you "liberate" a topic? By unlocking it? The mods don't make decisions based on player polls.

The old Jolt forums used to have a rating system for individual threads (up to five stars); perhaps implementing something like that would be a better idea? (Although "better" in relation to this could be nearly anything. )

[Sedgistan]

The Security Council still has some pretence that we're nations coming together to condemn/commend/liberate other nations/regions. That completely disappears when we start condemning topics.

[JURISDICTIONS]

No, No, No. That is not what I mean. A topic is not a "forum thread". By my use a "topic" is a subject people talk about.
So we could condemn... horrible technical forum ideas...

[Sedgistan]

Well with the example you just gave, my point still applies. Besides, Ardchoille said it was ok to use Commend/Condemn proposals to pretty much do that, so long as you can demonstrate the region/nation in question is a supporter of the concept they're representing.

[JURISDICTIONS]

Well... don't you think the SC should have more purpose than that? Everyone assumes that...the region will disappear...sooner or later nations and regions will clog up the server again... more and more people are getting a nation or region name to support a political view... and they are becoming sustainable... we could eliminate this potential problem... by doing as i have said above.

[Enn]

Such a shift would remove all pretence that the GA and SC have anything to do with one another, by removing the Gameplay aspect.

[JURISDICTIONS]

I am not asking to remove any part of the game, I want to add to it.

Think about it...Defenders hate Raiders right? so here is an example
[fakeproposal]
Condemn the act of Rading

Noting that rading is wrong............blaw............blaw
Resloves.....
Concludes....
So raiding is a very bad thing and should be condemned

[/fakeproposal]

I could submit a "Proper proposal" with out having a region or nation to condemn to do so.

[Sedgistan]

Why not just condemn actual raider regions?

[Flibbleites]

So we could condemn... horrible technical forum ideas...

Like this one.

[Quintessence of Dust]

There is also nothing stopping you using an existing category to accomplish exactly this aim. You could use the proposal text to explain why all raiding is destructive, all defending is counterproductive, all authors of substandard legislation irresponsible, all whatever whatever, and then condemn/commend one specific individual/region for said crimes/honours.

[Kalibarr]

Why not just condemn actual raider regions?

I see the ban on ideological bans has been exempted as well...

[JURISDICTIONS]

When you condemn a region you MUST PROVE, and GIVE EVIDENCE that shows that the region in question has done said act and detail how it was bad. Through this way....people could condemn or commend a particular subject without having to prove a specific nation or region has done something wrong or right whatever the case may be....This way would allow the WA through the SC maintain an opinion on certain subjects or "topics".