Region Tags!

by **Named After Spartz** » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:51 am

A commended, condemned and liberated tag would organize the extant nominees.

by **NewTexas** » Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:49 pm

Named After Spartz wrote:A commended, condemned and liberated tag would organize the extant nominees.

We would like to second this. Adding it could be like adding the "Featured" tag when the game does that for you. Figuring out all the commended, condemned and liberated regions takes lots of looking through the SC Resolutions.

by **Mahaj** » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:44 am

Mahaj wrote:whee, really sorry for a dig, but I've got a suggestion pertaining to this.

Could it be that when you click on a tag and the list of regions with the tag comes up, there was a way to sort those regions by population? Like, if you wanted, this is just an example, a region with the tag 'silly' and you wanted a large 'silly' region, instead of combing the list, you could sort it by population, making it easier.

This of course could be used for all the tags, although right now some don't need it, for most I imagine it might be helpful.

again, this would be nice.

by **Sedgistan** » Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:56 am

The admins are busy at the moment, there's no need to bump threads, unless the problem is urgent. They'll get read eventually.

by **Unibot II** » Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:29 pm

NewTexas wrote:
Named After Spartz wrote:A commended, condemned and liberated tag would organize the extant nominees.

We would like to second this. Adding it could be like adding the "Featured" tag when the game does that for you. Figuring out all the commended, condemned and liberated regions takes lots of looking through the SC Resolutions.

Tis not always updated, but this may help you, Big Tex.

by **The Onyx Abyss** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 3:07 am

Another good idea for a tag would be 'recently invaded' & 'trophy'.

by **The Most Glorious Hack** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:15 am

The Onyx Abyss wrote:Another good idea for a tag would be 'recently invaded' & 'trophy'.

There's enough ways to gloat with the systems in place.

by **Lancer II** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:39 am

The Most Glorious Hack wrote:
The Onyx Abyss wrote:Another good idea for a tag would be 'recently invaded' & 'trophy'.

There's enough ways to gloat with the systems in place.

I can see that applying to the latter of the tags, however the 'recently invaded' tag does not seem to be boastful at all. In fact it would help defenders if they are truly so overwhelmed and undermanned as they say.

by **Topid** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 4:15 pm

Lancer II wrote:
The Most Glorious Hack wrote:There's enough ways to gloat with the systems in place.

I can see that applying to the latter of the tags, however the 'recently invaded' tag does not seem to be boastful at all. In fact it would help defenders if they are truly so overwhelmed and undermanned as they say.

Except IMO it'd be flooded with regions that have never been raided, and then I don't think people would actually look at it.

by **Improving Wordiness** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:40 pm

It is bad enough there is a founderless tag to save invaders having to think about who to target. Adding a recently invaded tag just adds to the spam regions have to put up with along side of defacement of WFE's, loss of region flag and recruitment friendly tag being placed by invaders.
Its just another way for invaders to boast and not needed.

by **Mahaj** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:40 pm

Improving Wordiness wrote:It is bad enough there is a founderless tag to save invaders having to think about who to target. Adding a recently invaded tag just adds to the spam regions have to put up with along side of defacement of WFE's, loss of region flag and recruitment friendly tag being placed by invaders.
Its just another way for invaders to boast and not needed.

We could add 'Recently Defended', but I don't think it'd be used.

by **Improving Wordiness** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:42 pm

That would be just as pointless and would attract invaders.

by **Mahaj** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:48 pm

Improving Wordiness wrote:That would be just as pointless and would attract invaders.

yeah, true.

by **Unibot II** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:50 pm

Improving Wordiness wrote:It is bad enough there is a founderless tag to save invaders having to think about who to target. Adding a recently invaded tag just adds to the spam regions have to put up with along side of defacement of WFE's, loss of region flag and recruitment friendly tag being placed by invaders.
Its just another way for invaders to boast and not needed.

Although I do agree that more things to grief a region with.. tags.. embassies and whatnot is not good in that respect, raiders already have the 'recruiter friendly' tag and are using it for the purposes to signify a raid. Giving them a 'raided' tag may reduce how many raided regions are spammed by recruiters... obviously we can count on TBH and LWU to just use both tags, however future groups may not think of using the 'recruiter friendly' tag.

by **United Casio** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:51 pm

How about a "Europeanist" tag, a "science" tag , tropical tag and an "Island" tag

by **United Casio** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:53 pm

Ooh and a "Raided" tag

by **Omigodtheykilledkenny** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:01 pm

United Casio wrote:Ooh and a "Raided" tag

Haven't we already covered this?

by **United Casio** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:06 pm

Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:
United Casio wrote:Ooh and a "Raided" tag

Haven't we already covered this?

where?

by **Ballotonia** » Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:38 pm

United Casio wrote:
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Haven't we already covered this?

where?

One page ago: viewtopic.php?p=6561700#p6561700

Ballotonia

by **Mousebumples** » Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:10 pm

Lancer II wrote:I can see that applying to the latter of the tags, however the 'recently invaded' tag does not seem to be boastful at all. In fact it would help defenders if they are truly so overwhelmed and undermanned as they say.

Slight problem with this suggestion: Why on earth would raiders announce that a region they've taken is "recently invaded" ?

If a region has been invaded, the natives no longer have control of the delegacy - and therefore, they can't change the tags. I doubt any region with an active founder would be raided, so there's no founder to change the tags.

This concept - while nice - seems like it wouldn't be effective (at all) in practice.

by **New Britannian kingdom** » Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:01 pm

Kain_The_Dragoon wrote:
Leviathan Romefeller wrote:Two more id think could be useful would be:

Cyberpunk and Steampunk

That would be cool. Instead of Steampunk, you could have a catch all and make it "retrofuturism."

Or Retrofuture tech?

by **SalusaSecondus** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:32 pm

Added Steampunk, Cyberpunk, Pacifist, Magical, and Outer Space.

by **Unibot II** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:36 pm

SalusaSecondus wrote:Added Steampunk, Cyberpunk, Pacifist, Magical, and Outer Space.

Sort by: Today's World Census | Population | NameYour search returned no results.

Ahem, you may want a <br> in there.

by **SalusaSecondus** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:37 pm

Unibot II wrote:
SalusaSecondus wrote:Added Steampunk, Cyberpunk, Pacifist, Magical, and Outer Space.

Sort by: Today's World Census | Population | NameYour search returned no results.

Ahem, you may want a <br> in there.

Thanks. I'll fix that when I get home.

by **Luna Amore** » Mon Nov 21, 2011 10:44 pm

Any update on a possible tag to distinguish truely founderless regions from regions whose founder CTE?

Region Tags!

Who is online