Salusa thinks so.
Advertisement
by Swkoll » Wed May 11, 2011 10:53 am
by Tesabaki » Wed May 11, 2011 10:54 am
Makiir wrote:I would love to see a Map tag and a NSWiki tag.
I would also like to see a (can't think of a good name) "Currently looking for nations to fill government positions in our region" tag.
by Swkoll » Wed May 11, 2011 10:56 am
by Sedgistan » Wed May 11, 2011 10:58 am
by Swkoll » Wed May 11, 2011 11:01 am
Sedgistan wrote:
Erm... if a region is being invaded, and the founder/delegate is around to update tags, they should be able to kick the invaders too. If the region has already been invaded, then it'll be the invader delegate able to set the tags.
by SalusaSecondus » Wed May 11, 2011 11:08 am
by Jokolsylvania » Wed May 11, 2011 11:13 am
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Wed May 11, 2011 12:07 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Sedgistan » Wed May 11, 2011 12:17 pm
Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:What exactly does the "Game Player" tag mean?
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Wed May 11, 2011 12:18 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Umbra Ac Silentium wrote:What exactly does the "Game Player" tag mean?
People who... play the game? Have a browse through some of the threads in the Gameplay forum if you want to know what we get up to.
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Cricket Fans » Wed May 11, 2011 12:36 pm
by Makiir » Wed May 11, 2011 12:43 pm
Tesabaki wrote:Makiir wrote:I would love to see a Map tag and a NSWiki tag.
I would also like to see a (can't think of a good name) "Currently looking for nations to fill government positions in our region" tag.
Possibilities:
Help Wanted
Delegates Desired
Unfilled Leadership
That's All I can think of, at the moment. I'm not sure if anyone else has given Ideas, but these are my suggestions. the second one would work better for a region that has no WA delegate, though.
by Swkoll » Wed May 11, 2011 12:49 pm
Cricket Fans wrote:I'm not a fan of the founderless tag, which cannot be removed. That tag only helps raiders find targets. For founderless regions who like to fly under the radar, this just got one step harder. I'm not sure why nationstates would implement a tool that helps raiders....
by Germanic Townsville » Wed May 11, 2011 12:52 pm
SalusaSecondus wrote:Facist: Created
by Halcones » Wed May 11, 2011 12:55 pm
Cricket Fans wrote:I'm not a fan of the founderless tag, which cannot be removed. That tag only helps raiders find targets. For founderless regions who like to fly under the radar, this just got one step harder. I'm not sure why nationstates would implement a tool that helps raiders....
by SalusaSecondus » Wed May 11, 2011 1:03 pm
by Defero Populus » Wed May 11, 2011 1:07 pm
by Swkoll » Wed May 11, 2011 1:12 pm
by Defero Populus » Wed May 11, 2011 1:13 pm
Swkoll wrote:
I'm against Active because it seems that every region would add it even though they would turn inactive later. The only way to do this is the this tag could be automatically given to region with a rmb post in the last week or so.
by Swkoll » Wed May 11, 2011 1:19 pm
by Xamery » Wed May 11, 2011 1:50 pm
by The Apostatic » Wed May 11, 2011 1:55 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ankuran, Burning Love, Countriopia, Google [Bot], Haganham, Kractero, Minoa, Outer Sparta, Riemstagrad, Tiernesia
Advertisement