by Kringalia » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:51 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:16 pm
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Wordy » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:49 pm
RiderSyl wrote:
The ends justifies the meanies.
by Moon Eclipse » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:59 pm
by All Good People » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:31 pm
Allowing a delegate to ban people that aren't even in the region is overkill IMO.
by Mekhet » Sat Jun 21, 2014 7:36 pm
Moon Eclipse wrote:If this is a change, I am in full support.
Allowing a delegate to ban people that aren't even in the region is overkill IMO.
by The greater Vakolicci Haven » Sun Jun 22, 2014 2:50 am
All Good People wrote:In recent times, the period of time the ban/eject button was available on nations that had passed through and posted had been variable. It seemed that the timing had become random. One nation would have posted on the RMB within minutes and still on the RH, but I couldn't ban/eject them. Another time (same day even), a nation could be long off the RH and yet still have the buttons on them 45 minutes later.Allowing a delegate to ban people that aren't even in the region is overkill IMO.
Not when it allows them to hit and run post on your RMB all they want.
by Cormac A Stark » Sun Jun 22, 2014 8:28 am
The greater Vakolicci Haven wrote:IMO, recruitment is the price that the delegates of feeders and sinkers have to pay for all that they get in the game: hundreds of endorsements, guaranteed attention, a large region, first shot at the recruitment of the new nations (via 'stay here' telegrams...)
by Moon Eclipse » Sun Jun 22, 2014 9:20 am
Cormac A Stark wrote:Founders and Delegates need to be able to ban people who move in and then out of their regions just for the purpose of abusing posting access to the RMBs of regions with which they have embassies.
Mekhet wrote:s
Disagreed. It's well within the rights of Founders/Delegates to pre-emptively ban other nations and with the new embassy system changes more important to be able to do so.
by Unibot III » Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:33 pm
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Kringalia » Sun Jun 22, 2014 5:45 pm
by [violet] » Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:19 pm
[violet] wrote:Fixed, I think; there was a new bug that incorrectly prevented nations from being bannable if they were outside your region but in your Regional Happenings but had not embassy-posted.
by Kringalia » Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:49 pm
by Klorgia1 » Mon Mar 04, 2019 5:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Catzaza, Oceaniesia, Reyo, TBH Commander, Tepertopia, Thermodolia
Advertisement