NATION

PASSWORD

Suggestion: Remove "Minnow" classification

Bug reports, general help, ideas for improvements, and questions about how things are meant to work.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Neasmyrna
Envoy
 
Posts: 260
Founded: Mar 09, 2007
Anarchy

Postby Neasmyrna » Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:17 pm

Anime Daisuki wrote:
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:If the influence text labels had to be retained due to coding issues, I was thinking of something less controversial, such as... simply "resident".


'Resident' better than blank. Minnow is at least, something, 'blank' is nothing, and the newbies will start asking tons of questions "hey why don't I have influence? Why is mine blank?"


haha...

yeah

No blank. I believe the original idea was to base giving people rankings once they passed a certain population. But in reality some new people move to a region the first day with a bunch of friends and if there are only 4 or so people in that region they're going to get up to a considerable rank after only a few days.

I don't think resident would be a good term for it (it doesn't quite fit in with things like negotiator and truckler in my opinion)

but that's roughly the right idea.

I thought for a split second of what would happen if you just bumped all the names up so Vassal was the first one... but even then I wouldn't necessarily want to be a "lowly" vassal of some feeder region--it's almost as bad as minnow only we know that it's not :roll:.

if you know what I mean.
Founder of 00000 A World Power

You're welcome to visit our forum at:

User avatar
The Most Glorious Hack
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 2427
Founded: Mar 11, 2003
Anarchy

Postby The Most Glorious Hack » Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:36 am

The Bicycle: If you want to discuss stripping non-WA members from influence calculations, make your own thread; this is not the thread for it.
Now the stars they are all angled wrong,
And the sun and the moon refuse to burn.
But I remember a message,
In a demon's hand:
"Dread the passage of Jesus, for he does not return."

-Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, "Time Jesum Transeuntum Et Non Riverentum"



User avatar
The Bicycle
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Sep 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bicycle » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:03 am

The Most Glorious Hack wrote:The Bicycle: If you want to discuss stripping non-WA members from influence calculations, make your own thread; this is not the thread for it.


Ever heard of topic drift?
It's a related issue, after all. And a better solution than the one the thread started with.

User avatar
The Most Glorious Hack
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 2427
Founded: Mar 11, 2003
Anarchy

Postby The Most Glorious Hack » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:10 am

The Bicycle wrote:Ever heard of topic drift?
It's a related issue, after all. And a better solution than the one the thread started with.
Ever heard of a Moderator? Take it to another thread.
Now the stars they are all angled wrong,
And the sun and the moon refuse to burn.
But I remember a message,
In a demon's hand:
"Dread the passage of Jesus, for he does not return."

-Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, "Time Jesum Transeuntum Et Non Riverentum"



User avatar
The Bicycle
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Sep 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bicycle » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:17 am

Sigh... What a boring forum. Take a look around the web! The world has generally moved on from the ancient, oppressive forums of the past. Topic drift is a natural thing in conversations. Could you imagine a group of friends sitting around a table, having a good time, but as soon as one of them changed the subject even a tiny bit, some other guy would come around to bark at him! What a silly notion!

User avatar
Goias
Diplomat
 
Posts: 653
Founded: Nov 06, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Goias » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:21 am

Todd McCloud wrote:Great idea, in my opinion. It *is* demoralizing to see the 'minnow' title, which is why there might be a lot of swappers - no one really wants to be seen as such.


Gets worse if you had progressed up the ladder and then move to another region and revert back to "minnow" (what happened to me)...
Just repeat to yourself, "it's just a show, I should really just relax"
Factbook -- Embassy program
98% of all internet users would cry if facebook would break down, if you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh then copy and paste this into your sig.
The Araucania wrote:all that pop singers are instruments of the state for make stupid people.

User avatar
Loria Aesir
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 192
Founded: Mar 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Loria Aesir » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:32 am

I think it's a great idea.
One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place
DEFCON 4

User avatar
[violet]
Executive Director
 
Posts: 16213
Founded: Antiquity

Postby [violet] » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:55 am

I'm kinda in favor of dropping the label for Minnows, and "Regional Power" in regions where it's "Low." It would reduce clutter, and if influence/power is zero, or pretty close to, there's nothing worth displaying. But yes, I fear causing players to scroll around haplessly, hunting for their missing Influence label.

User avatar
Kandarin
Diplomat
 
Posts: 869
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kandarin » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:11 am

[violet] wrote:I'm kinda in favor of dropping the label for Minnows, and "Regional Power" in regions where it's "Low." It would reduce clutter, and if influence/power is zero, or pretty close to, there's nothing worth displaying. But yes, I fear causing players to scroll around haplessly, hunting for their missing Influence label.


Perhaps an announcement at the time would clarify things? I know you folks don't always have those, but if there were PR concerns it might be a good idea.
I wish I remember who wrote:Games like Nationstates are like a big cardboard box, and there are two kinds of people in the world. The kind who look at the empty void inside the box and ask "Where the hell is it?" and the kind who jump into the box with their friends and make it into a fort, or a spaceship.

User avatar
Neasmyrna
Envoy
 
Posts: 260
Founded: Mar 09, 2007
Anarchy

Postby Neasmyrna » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:24 pm

Kandarin wrote:
[violet] wrote:I'm kinda in favor of dropping the label for Minnows, and "Regional Power" in regions where it's "Low." It would reduce clutter, and if influence/power is zero, or pretty close to, there's nothing worth displaying. But yes, I fear causing players to scroll around haplessly, hunting for their missing Influence label.


Perhaps an announcement at the time would clarify things? I know you folks don't always have those, but if there were PR concerns it might be a good idea.


That would require people reading something which is similar to "listening"

And I wouldn't be surprised if there were dozens of inquiry's and confused people anyway :P

I actually like the idea of having less clutter... hadn't thought about it that way. But I think it would be really weird for thousands of NS players (and regions) to not have any marking thing when hundreds of others did. But that's something I may be able to get over :P
Founder of 00000 A World Power

You're welcome to visit our forum at:

User avatar
Unibot
Senator
 
Posts: 4292
Founded: May 25, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot » Thu Nov 12, 2009 7:07 pm

Neasmyrna wrote:
Kandarin wrote:
[violet] wrote:I'm kinda in favor of dropping the label for Minnows, and "Regional Power" in regions where it's "Low." It would reduce clutter, and if influence/power is zero, or pretty close to, there's nothing worth displaying. But yes, I fear causing players to scroll around haplessly, hunting for their missing Influence label.


Perhaps an announcement at the time would clarify things? I know you folks don't always have those, but if there were PR concerns it might be a good idea.


...But I think it would be really weird for thousands of NS players (and regions) to not have any marking thing when hundreds of others did. ....:P


I don't think theres going to be too many people upset about losing their precious "minnow" rankings. :rofl:

*Added to the Big List*

User avatar
Warre
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 15
Founded: Feb 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Warre » Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:58 pm

I'm for the removal of the minnow classification or rework of it's name.

I can agree that it's demoralizing, and it's also a very likely cause of losing of players. While my population has grown in the 2 years since I've been here, my influence classification is still 'minnow', even barring the fact I've had 60 or so endorsements at a time before.
Proud member of the Gailund region, and alt of the Aurora Union is a strong Roleplaying region and anyone who's interested can find our offsite forums here: Gailund Roleplay Forums. If you think you'd like 1960s era Roleplay with a great background story, great roleplayers, interesting nations- and staff that wants to help, you should check out our region!

User avatar
Northern Chittowa
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Mar 03, 2005
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Northern Chittowa » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:35 pm

The Most Glorious Hack wrote:
Northern Chittowa wrote:Thats true...Ive had my main WA in Lazarus now for close to a year i believe, probably longer, yet im still classed as a minnow despite that fact and the fact i have 71 endorsements :P I dont mind it a great deal, yet i can fully understand people getting annoyed at having the title.
Huh. My non-WA puppet in Lazarus is a Vassal... of course, it's been there a very, very long time...


AH! MOD CONSPIRACY!!

*Cough*

User avatar
EvilDarkMagicians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13456
Founded: Jul 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:04 am

I support this idea.

User avatar
New Bazlantis
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: Jul 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bazlantis » Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:23 am

Did anything become of this idea? It seems as though everyone reached a consensus to do away with 'minnow' yet it still remains?

Mod Update?

UNIBOT DIED FOR YOUR SINS: REPENT!

User avatar
The Murtunian Tribes
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6919
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Murtunian Tribes » Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:06 pm

New Bazlantis wrote:Did anything become of this idea? It seems as though everyone reached a consensus to do away with 'minnow' yet it still remains?

Mod Update?

Consensus means nothing in technical.


User avatar
The Murtunian Tribes
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6919
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Murtunian Tribes » Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:57 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:... but an admin response is worth bumping.

[violet] wrote:I'm kinda in favor of dropping the label for Minnows...

I stand corrected.

User avatar
Tim-Opolis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Feb 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Tim-Opolis » Sat Dec 24, 2011 5:02 pm

The Murtunian Tribes wrote:
Frisbeeteria wrote:... but an admin response is worth bumping.


I stand corrected.


Yet. 2 years later it's still there....

Maybe it shall come with the TG revamp
Want to be a hero? Join The Grey Wardens - Help Us Save Nationstates
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Commended by Security Council Resolution #420 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Author of SC#74, SC #203, SC #222, and SC #238 | Co-Author of SC#191
Founder of Spiritus | Three-Time Delegate of Osiris | Pharaoh of the Islamic Republics of Iran | Hero of Greece
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

User avatar
New Bazlantis
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: Jul 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bazlantis » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:05 am

Frisbeeteria wrote:... but an admin response is worth bumping.

[violet] wrote:I'm kinda in favor of dropping the label for Minnows...


*quietly reappears*

BUUUUUUUUMP!

*scurries away*

UNIBOT DIED FOR YOUR SINS: REPENT!


Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ammmericaaaa, Mirne, PhDre

Advertisement

Remove ads