Advertisement
by Scolopendra » Thu May 07, 2009 1:29 pm
by Dunczton » Thu May 07, 2009 1:46 pm
Somewhereistonia wrote:Erastide wrote:Somewhereistonia wrote:How about this, a simple flag with NS colours.
The problem is, if you're scrolling posts down, that would register as still alive initally. At least to me. Hopefully without being too jarring, it should be easy to recognize that that poster no longer exists.
Hmm, I see your point, so here is the Mk.2
by Somewhereistonia » Thu May 07, 2009 1:48 pm
by Nautilus Landing » Thu May 07, 2009 2:04 pm
by Somewhereistonia » Thu May 07, 2009 2:53 pm
Nautilus Landing wrote:It has strong clear colors and the shadow effect on the symbols shows that its a non flag rather than a flag with that symbol.
by UNIverseVERSE » Thu May 07, 2009 3:06 pm
Scolopendra wrote:That's where we disagree. If you go for a less-specific family of flags, say tricolors or various crosses, then once the color's been bled out and the image faded the kind of people who would complain were it specific will see specificity where none is intended. I base this on experience; just ask a room full of (Slavic) Macedonians, Albanians, and Greeks what ethnicity Alexander the Great was and watch the bloodshed. For some reason it's the unimportant harmless details that people get hung up on.
Hence if we use a class of flag--let's say, for example, the vertical tricolor--then nationalistic Italians and French who have nothing better to do but complain will complain. If it's a horizontal tricolor, then Russians and Germans will see some sort of coded message in it and complain. Offset cross, Scandinavians. Solid color, Libya. The list goes on and on and on.
This is why I argue for using an original design which, while flaglike, is not used IRL at all if possible and, preferably, does not even resemble anything IRL except unless you squint and stand on your head.
by Somewhereistonia » Thu May 07, 2009 3:15 pm
UNIverseVERSE wrote:How about doing diagonal tricolor, which is slightly interesting looking and, as far as I know, not used IRL by anybody. Fade it to three shades of grey with transparency, stamp Ex-Nation over it, and you should be good to go (but don't ask me to actually make it or a mockup - I couldn't even make this flag I have now).
by Todd McCloud » Thu May 07, 2009 3:42 pm
by Erastide » Thu May 07, 2009 3:53 pm
Somewhereistonia wrote:But I can't see your flag... http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t38/ ... 1241734499
by Somewhereistonia » Thu May 07, 2009 4:12 pm
Erastide wrote:Somewhereistonia wrote:But I can't see your flag... http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t38/ ... 1241734499
He did that deliberately. It's a transparent png file.
by Avalaun (Ancient) » Thu May 07, 2009 9:36 pm
by Barringtonia » Thu May 07, 2009 9:43 pm
Scolopendra wrote:This is why I argue for using an original design which, while flaglike, is not used IRL at all if possible and, preferably, does not even resemble anything IRL except unless you squint and stand on your head.
by Scolopendra » Thu May 07, 2009 11:02 pm
Barringtonia wrote:Scolopendra wrote:This is why I argue for using an original design which, while flaglike, is not used IRL at all if possible and, preferably, does not even resemble anything IRL except unless you squint and stand on your head.
I see you're coming around to my cigarette design.
by Barringtonia » Thu May 07, 2009 11:10 pm
Scolopendra wrote:Doesn't meet the "flag-like" criterion.
by Bears Armed » Fri May 08, 2009 12:36 am
Somewhereistonia wrote:Erastide wrote:Somewhereistonia wrote:How about this, a simple flag with NS colours.
The problem is, if you're scrolling posts down, that would register as still alive initally. At least to me. Hopefully without being too jarring, it should be easy to recognize that that poster no longer exists.
Hmm, I see your point, so here is the Mk.2
by Nautilus Landing » Fri May 08, 2009 2:14 am
by Jandypolis » Fri May 08, 2009 6:53 am
Somewhereistonia wrote:UNIverseVERSE wrote:How about doing diagonal tricolor, which is slightly interesting looking and, as far as I know, not used IRL by anybody. Fade it to three shades of grey with transparency, stamp Ex-Nation over it, and you should be good to go (but don't ask me to actually make it or a mockup - I couldn't even make this flag I have now).
Something like this? I'm not sure, although I need to even it up.
But I can't see your flag... http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t38/ ... 1241734499
by UNIverseVERSE » Fri May 08, 2009 7:41 am
Somewhereistonia wrote:
Something like this? I'm not sure, although I need to even it up.
But I can't see your flag... http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t38/ ... 1241734499
by Esternial » Sat May 09, 2009 2:37 am
Commerce Heights wrote:
This blends into the forum color scheme, making it stand out from the colorful flags of most actual nations without being distracting.
by West-Flanders » Sat May 09, 2009 10:36 am
Esternial wrote:Commerce Heights wrote:
This blends into the forum color scheme, making it stand out from the colorful flags of most actual nations without being distracting.
I vote for this one
by Scolopendra » Sat May 09, 2009 10:05 pm
by Valipac » Sat May 09, 2009 10:24 pm
Scolopendra wrote:You have to read the entire thread; that one is no-go because it's "ex-nation" and the Aboriginal flag. Seeing how Aboriginals were once at risk to become an ex-people, this offends some peoples' sensibilities.
by Golden Triangle Tout » Sun May 10, 2009 4:46 am
by The Most Glorious Hack » Sun May 10, 2009 6:30 am
This amuses me.Nautilus Landing wrote:
by West-Flanders » Sun May 10, 2009 10:41 am
Golden Triangle Tout wrote:How about a different theme, but keeping with the ex-nation idea:
At 107x71
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Countriopia, Great Joy, Grishahakkaverchynot, Iujhj, Leoria and Portardosa, New Verodania, Omnicontrol, Sao-Paulo, Sarzonia, Stolos, Thorn1000, Tiragrativ
Advertisement