Advertisement
by Sichuan Pepper » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:48 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.
by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:48 am
by Communist Eraser » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:50 am
[violet] wrote:Afforess wrote:
I think that is one valid concern. I wonder if recruitment TG's could be in a totally separate section of the inbox, and not consume regular TG allotments.
That was actually the way it worked in a first version of the new TG system, but after the category-based blocks were added, it seemed unnecessary.
One thing we could do is ease it in, so that at first nations who haven't selected a TG block default to blocking "Most", then after a while it shifts to "Some", then "None."
by [violet] » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:51 am
Cormac Stark wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:I do not see why so many of you oppose competition.
Because it's wealth competition, not effort or quality competition. People with enough money are going to peel away people from regions no matter how much those regions have to offer, just because they have a great recruitment TG and the money to mass spam it.
I'm fine with competition but I want the competition to be about my region and what it has to offer, not about how much is in my bank account or how much the true believers in Right to Life are willing to spend to send their totally unrelated to the game message.
by Cerian Quilor » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:52 am
by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:53 am
by Weed » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:54 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:Weed wrote:This is a valid point. This is the only advantage UCRs have over GCRs.
Not the only. UCRs, out of nessesesity, have 'evolved' to also be more opening and welcoming to new people, because they need to work harder to get yeild out of what they get by TG. That is a natural advantage that UCRs have developed out of nessesity.
I mean, half+ the prominent players I see in the feeders and Sinkers got their start elsewhere in NS before moving into the GCRs. There is a reason for this.
by Individuality-ness » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:57 am
by Cerian Quilor » Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:58 am
Weed wrote:Cerian Quilor wrote:Not the only. UCRs, out of nessesesity, have 'evolved' to also be more opening and welcoming to new people, because they need to work harder to get yeild out of what they get by TG. That is a natural advantage that UCRs have developed out of nessesity.
I mean, half+ the prominent players I see in the feeders and Sinkers got their start elsewhere in NS before moving into the GCRs. There is a reason for this.
That's not a technical advantage of UCRs. Nor is it the reason most people start in UCRs, but that's irrelevant.
by Feux » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:00 am
One thing we could do is ease it in, so that at first nations who haven't selected a TG block default to blocking "Most", then after a while it shifts to "Some", then "None."
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Unibot III » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:04 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Cerian Quilor » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:06 am
Feux wrote:One thing we could do is ease it in, so that at first nations who haven't selected a TG block default to blocking "Most", then after a while it shifts to "Some", then "None."
I approve of this.
by Feux » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:07 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:Has it occurred to those of you in UCRs (or GCRs, for that matter) that your Delegate and Founder can now send out a FREE mass telegram instructing your regionmates on how to disable mass telegrams? If they're actually loyal and not just relying on inertia, that should prevent mass defections.
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Communist Eraser » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:08 am
Feux wrote:One thing we could do is ease it in, so that at first nations who haven't selected a TG block default to blocking "Most", then after a while it shifts to "Some", then "None."
I approve of this.
by Weed » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:08 am
Feux wrote:Frisbeeteria wrote:Has it occurred to those of you in UCRs (or GCRs, for that matter) that your Delegate and Founder can now send out a FREE mass telegram instructing your regionmates on how to disable mass telegrams? If they're actually loyal and not just relying on inertia, that should prevent mass defections.
I'm confused now. Are we talking the set max of 8 at a time or can I telegram everyone in Lazarus for free?
by Unibot III » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:09 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:@Unibot: You recruit people via Private messages, IRC and other 3rd party sources. That's how I invited people I knew to Kantrias. Or just talk about your region and how cool it is and wait for them to come on their own.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Cerian Quilor » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:10 am
Communist Eraser wrote:Feux wrote:
I approve of this.
Sometime else saw that. If we are willing to go with this system I propose:
Newly created nations (Feeders etc) start with 'None' and slowly go to "Most". Once a nation moves to a UCR it jumps to "Most" slowly going to "None". This resets to "Most"->"None" again if a nation jumps between different UCRs. The nation of course could override and manually set their own preference at any time.
We just need want time and a chance to have try and integrate the nation first, for a while before opening it up again.
by Sichuan Pepper » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:11 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Yeah but no one here can read. Literacy is a tool used by fendas, like IRC or morals.
by Olthar » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:11 am
by Feux » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:14 am
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Gest » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:14 am
Sichuan Pepper wrote:Game created regions are the largest simply due to nations constantly spawning and no work needed to maintain that population....how will you offset the advantage these regions hold violet?
by Unibot III » Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:16 am
Communist Eraser wrote:Feux wrote:
I approve of this.
Sometime else saw that. If we are willing to go with this system I propose:
Newly created nations (Feeders etc) start with 'None' and slowly go to "Most". Once a nation moves to a UCR it jumps to "Most" slowly going to "None". This resets to "Most"->"None" again if a nation jumps between different UCRs. The nation of course could override and manually set their own preference at any time.
We just need want time and a chance to have try and integrate the nation first, for a while before opening it up again.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bali Kingdom, DBastion, FyoC, Hecrewyth, Kingdom of Castille, Kurp, New Al Ber, North American Imperial State, Taledonia, Three Galaxies, Tracian Empire, Yuspuize
Advertisement