Advertisement
by Unibotian WASC Mission » Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:52 am
by Flibbleites » Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:58 am
[violet] wrote:Just want to let you know this is still at the top of the list--I'm working on it in conjunction with some other stuff but it's definitely a priority. Just been slowed down by RL lately. Stupid RL!
by Gauntleted Fist » Sat Dec 12, 2009 12:49 am
[violet] wrote:Just want to let you know this is still at the top of the list--I'm working on it in conjunction with some other stuff but it's definitely a priority. Just been slowed down by RL lately. Stupid RL!
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:00 am
by Todd McCloud » Sat Feb 06, 2010 3:33 pm
by Allrule » Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:11 pm
by Flibbleites » Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:18 pm
by Linux and the X » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:33 pm
[violet] wrote:Getting there.
by Todd McCloud » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:35 pm
by Linux and the X » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:39 pm
by Linux and the X » Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:33 pm
by Pythagosaurus » Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:46 pm
by JURISDICTIONS » Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:48 am
Takaram wrote:Irony. Rule 4 prevents a repeal based on Rule 4 violations, meaning that Rule 4 does not comply with Rule 4. It should be struck down.
by Pythagosaurus » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:05 am
by Todd McCloud » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:59 am
by JURISDICTIONS » Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:49 am
Takaram wrote:Irony. Rule 4 prevents a repeal based on Rule 4 violations, meaning that Rule 4 does not comply with Rule 4. It should be struck down.
by Flibbleites » Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:33 am
JURISDICTIONS wrote:Funny pyth. very funny. apparently people around here do have humor!
by JURISDICTIONS » Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:54 am
Pythagosaurus wrote:No. Joking is something that people with senses of humor do.
Takaram wrote:Irony. Rule 4 prevents a repeal based on Rule 4 violations, meaning that Rule 4 does not comply with Rule 4. It should be struck down.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:19 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Orcland
Advertisement