Hit Harder on Dismissed Issues

[Jedi Women]

I don't know if this would even be possible, but it's something I've been thinking about.

Obviously we get issues back around every so often, but is there any way/ does anyone think it would be a good idea if when a nation dismisses an issue rather than making a choice, a more extreme version of the issue comes to them a month or so later.

Like, say people were protesting eating the national animal and rather than choose the "let continue" or "ban eating *national animal* " options, they just dismiss. A month or so later a more violent incident occurs related to the dismissed issue.

Don't know if such a thing would even be workable, and obviously not every issue could be expanded on... but I just thought it'd be interesting.

[New Olwe]

Hmm. I can see how some of the issues I've dismissed recently could benefit from this... it's an intriguing idea. We'll see what the mods say, though.

[Shinkadomayaka]

A good idea, but I doubt it would happen ... Not because it's a bad idea, but because it would be really diffficult to do that.

[Erastide]

I'm reasonably certain the game doesn't keep track of your dismissal of issues. So at this point in time such a suggestion would be impossible. But of course I could be wrong or [violet] or Pyth could be generous and add that feature in so that Sirocco could take advantage of it.

[Shinkadomayaka]

I'm reasonably certain the game doesn't keep track of your dismissal of issues. So at this point in time such a suggestion would be impossible. But of course I could be wrong or [violet] or Pyth could be generous and add that feature in so that Sirocco could take advantage of it.

yays i would like that feature. I thought of one also. If you dismiss the "Less dictatorship please, if thats okay" issue then later there are riots and stuff.

[Sirocco]

I'm afraid this idea's a bit unworkable. What's to stop you from constantly dismissing issues you don't like? And if you can't dismiss the second issue then it rather negates the point of having a dismiss option for the first one. It's a nice idea, but I'd rather have issues that directly address the consequences of choices that the players DO make rather than the ones they don't.