NationStates

Maybe...

Dysian wrote:I will call upon the FAQ again. Invading is right there in the regional code, and SO is region crashing, imposing a password, banning all members etc. etc:

No, because (unless I'm incredibly mistaken) the code has no concept of which group of players might control a region, only of which nation currently holds the delegacy. The idea of a group of invaders moving into a region and turfing out the natives is one that solely exists in the mind of the players, which is why the rules against it (or permitting it) are also at that level.

Dysian wrote:You are infringing on our basic player rights here

You don't have any. You have privileges. Your only right as a player is to leave.

Dysian wrote:

[violet] wrote: If we wanted to, we'd ban raiding...
I support the invasion game, but I don't support raiders being able to do whatever they like,

Two very contradictory statements. You support invading, therefor you don't ban it. You don't support region crashing - so why don't you ban it?

From my own experience, I imagine [violet]'s response here will be "oh shut up". This should not be taken to mean "you're right, and I don't care". It means "you are being deliberately asinine; you must be aware of how completely and utterly wrong that argument is, so I'm not going to deal with you anymore". And since this feature has already been implemented, this thread no longer serves a purpose. Technical is not a debate forum. iLock.