Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2021 6:11 pm
CoraSpia wrote:Has the moderation team discussed these proposals?
The moderation team doesn't change game code. Any change in the nation name release has to come from [violet].
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
CoraSpia wrote:Has the moderation team discussed these proposals?
Disgraced: This name was soiled by a former nation (of significant size).instead of:
Reserved: This name was used by a former nation of significant size.?
Grishahakkaverchynot wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=boneyard?nation=pussy
Just wondering, even after the nation died to inactivity, is there still a way for a mod to flag that name and the Boneyard would say :Disgraced: This name was soiled by a former nation (of significant size).instead of:Reserved: This name was used by a former nation of significant size.?
Brilliantly wrote:IMAO fives years is so long imagine you can only claim a nation name when it was created in 2016 March 16 and before. Also because when nationstates was just created most players took the best and beautiful names so when they cease to exist and the name becames available, most existing nations would fight to make a puppet. We should enable a option where the owner says that the name can be reused in lesser periods or what the owner says so for example you made the nation A and you messed up but still want the name you can enable that.
CoraSpia wrote:Frisbeeteria wrote:The moderation team doesn't change game code. Any change in the nation name release has to come from [violet].
Sorry, not been monitoring this thread closely:
Has this been raised to [Violet]'s attention? The 5-year limit is a good one and should stay, but I think a case can certainly be made for introducing a population-based slider system.
Brilliantly wrote:IMAO fives years is so long imagine you can only claim a nation name when it was created in 2016 March 16 and before. Also because when nationstates was just created most players took the best and beautiful names so when they cease to exist and the name becames available, most existing nations would fight to make a puppet. We should enable a option where the owner says that the name can be reused in lesser periods or what the owner says so for example you made the nation A and you messed up but still want the name you can enable that.
Parhe wrote:Brilliantly wrote:IMAO fives years is so long imagine you can only claim a nation name when it was created in 2016 March 16 and before. Also because when nationstates was just created most players took the best and beautiful names so when they cease to exist and the name becames available, most existing nations would fight to make a puppet. We should enable a option where the owner says that the name can be reused in lesser periods or what the owner says so for example you made the nation A and you messed up but still want the name you can enable that.
This was mentioned before. I think it would be a great idea, though I don't know how difficult it would be.
Brilliantly wrote:Parhe wrote:This was mentioned before. I think it would be a great idea, though I don't know how difficult it would be.
Yes because I messed up my nation’s policies, like installed “ stupid “ policies that I never meant to do. I changed it password and removed email, to hope it ceases to exist and I can re-start the nation 5 years later, but That is a very very long time. Maybe users enable option that when the second the nation ceases to exist, someone can immediately claim the name in boneyard and use it. I really want my name back, from myself ( LOL ).
Caleonia wrote:I was about to say something on my own regard but then I realized that not only would I be changing my name (which is not possible), but the name I wanted has already existed before with a population of 1.117 billion.
They haven’t been active in almost 11 years though, so yes, I would be a proponent of the time to population slider becoming a thing. It may just be me being tired of seeing the “ia” at the end of my country’s name when I always refer to it without.
Bunkaiia wrote:It's been over 18 years since a country with less than 1 billion went quiet. When will its name be available again?
Bunkaiia wrote: When will its name be available again?
Drew Durrnil wrote:never
Luna Amore wrote:Brilliantly wrote:
Yes because I messed up my nation’s policies, like installed “ stupid “ policies that I never meant to do. I changed it password and removed email, to hope it ceases to exist and I can re-start the nation 5 years later, but That is a very very long time. Maybe users enable option that when the second the nation ceases to exist, someone can immediately claim the name in boneyard and use it. I really want my name back, from myself ( LOL ).
Any change made by an issue can be undone by a future issue.
Tinhampton wrote:During the transfer to Jolt in the summer of 2004, eleven Historical Resolutions by eleven different authors were deleted from the official record. One of these authors, Mercia, already has their name reserved for authoring HR#5 "DVD region removal;" another, Labrador, got DEATed in 2004; seven of the other nine authors (Thinkers, Padmez, Scrotalia, Herozerax, Cappadocia, Fortunado, and Forkissa) have reached the population threshold of 500 million and are thus reserved on those grounds.
This leaves us with two authors whose names would have been reserved on authorship (but not population) grounds had their Historical Resolutions not been purged. Conservative Economics authored "Resolution Restrictions" but CTEd about a week after its passage after only accruing 128 million inhabitants. Stormymilkshake, the author of "Passport harmonisation," CTEd in April 2004 with a population of 461 million.
Why, then, can the names of Conservative Economics and Stormymilkshake not at least be manually mod-retired (as Dyakovo, for instance, has) - given that their names would in normal circumstances be reserved due to being used "by a former nation that authored Historical World Assembly Resolutions?"
(UPDATE: I would like to thank The Langburn Islands and Honeydewistania respectively for their work in ensuring that these two nations can at least be theoretically reserved on population grounds in a few months time.)
Brilliantly wrote: the self deleted nation of chessqueen
Brilliantly wrote: Please fix the system.
Frisbeeteria wrote:Brilliantly wrote: the self deleted nation of chessqueen
You deliberately destroyed Chessqueen in a manner to make it unrecoverable, and then you changed your mind.Brilliantly wrote: Please fix the system.
There's nothing wrong with the system. You made the choice to make your nation unrecoverable when all you actually needed to do was stop logging on. We're not going to fix something that isn't broken on our end.