NATION

PASSWORD

Issue Help.

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Sorgan
Senator
 
Posts: 3560
Founded: Jun 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Issue Help.

Postby Sorgan » Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:15 am

The Issue

Several animal rights groups have protested the continuing use of fur as a material for clothing.
The Debate

1. "This is an outrage!" cries Prudence Hanover, president of the Be Nice To Animals society. "The manufacture of fur apparel is unethical, cruel, and disgusting! People just don't seem to realise that millions of animals die each year in fur farms, crammed into tiny cages and suffering the most terrible treatment just so someone can look appealing and rich! This is a sick practice and must be stopped! The same can go for leather shoes and snakeskin belts too."


2. "You can't mean that, surely?" snorts Colin McAlpin, adjusting his hat, made from real Bluefish hide. "It's the people's choice what they wear. I don't think it's fair that the majority of the public should be deprived of fur clothes because some people are a bit queasy. In fact, if the government would allow us to stock rarer animals, we could produce even finer products. In the end, it's up to the consumer, don't you think?"



******Which one would lower civil rights?****************

User avatar
Marcuslandia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1082
Founded: Aug 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Issue Help.

Postby Marcuslandia » Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:51 am

Generally speaking, putting down limits on things tend to lower some rating or another. The first choice would reduce some people's freedom to choose what they wore, so CR-. It would also reduce businesses' freedom to choose what to produce and sell, so EF-.

The second option therefore would cause a CR+/EF+ tweak.
"If you don't know what is worth dying for, your life isn't worth living."

"Choose wisely."

User avatar
Cynthia McKinney
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Dec 11, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Issue Help.

Postby Cynthia McKinney » Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:11 pm

The first option protects animal rights but hurts economic freedom and economic strength.

The second option is bad for the animals but it improves economic freedom and economic strength so I always choose the 2nd option.


Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads