Issue Title: "Clickbait to the Ballot Box"
Description:
In an era of technological advancement, a growing number of politicians have turned to virtual campaigning as their primary mode of interaction with the electorate. Virtual rallies, holographic debates, and AI-generated campaign speeches have become the norm.
Option 1:
"Embrace the Future!" insists tech-savvy political strategist @@RANDOMNAME@@. "Virtual campaigns are more inclusive, cost-effective, and eco-friendly. We should encourage politicians to reach voters through virtual means. This will save time, money, and reduce the environmental impact of traditional campaign events."
Effect:
politicians are virtually stumped by Zoom-bombing clowns.
Option 2:
"We should have our hands on Democracy!" argues grassroots activist @@RANDOMNAME@@. "There's no substitute for a politician's physical presence in a community. Virtual campaigning disconnects leaders from the people they serve. Let's encourage traditional, in-person campaign events, town hall meetings, and door-to-door canvassing to keep our democracy personal and people-centric."
Effect:
politicians accidentally crash BBQs in a fervour to connect with voters.
Option 3:
"The key is balance,” suggests political commentator @@RANDOMNAME@@. “Politicians should use technology as a tool, not a replacement. Virtual campaigns can supplement traditional methods. Create guidelines that ensure a mix of virtual and in-person campaigning. This way, we embrace the future while preserving personal connections."
Effect:
politicians struggle to juggle holograms and babies to keep voters engaged.
Option 4:
"We need to keep the human element" emphasizes social psychologist @@RANDOMNAME@@. "Virtual campaigns may be efficient, but they lack empathy and human connection. We should restrict the use of virtual campaign tactics, allowing politicians to connect on a personal level with constituents. This will foster mutual understanding and trust."
Effect:
political campaigns often turn into impromptu therapy sessions.
