Page 1 of 1

SUBMITTED: Never Fly With Children or Animals

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2022 9:36 pm
by Australian rePublic
[title] Never Fly With Children or Animals

[validity] pets and planes are allowed

[desc] On a flight from @@ANIMAL@@ City to Greenville, a passenger made the news by squealing throughout the whole flight, running amuck and even bitting into an other passenger’s halal meal. The passenger in question was Rowan Oinkenson, an emotional support pig, bringing to your office the question of whether or not animals should be allowed in the main cabin of planes

[option] "The audicity of some people!" complains @@RANDOMFEMALENAME@@, a passenger who flew with her 2 year old son on that flight. "I was changing Richard's nappy on the tray table when that swine went and pooed on the clean one! And its squealing was so loud that there was an entire 20 minutes which drowned out Richard's 4 hour crying session! Pet owners can’t be trusted to take their pets on board planes. Ban animals from the cabin!"
[effect] screaming crying babies are considered better behaved than quiet dogs

[option] "You're one to talk!" suggests @@RANDOMFEMALENAME@@, who brought her dog on board “Instead of keeping him in his place, your actions with regards to your little Richard were quite inappropriate. Meanwhile Rex was on his best behaviour! Isn't that right Rexy? Good boy! Good boy! Anyway, If anything, kids, not animals should be banned from planes!"
[effect] pigs will fly before children are allowed on aeroplanes

[option] "How frightfully rude, the lot of you!" complains @@RANDOMMALENAME@@! Yet another passenger on the flight "My mother didn't pay for me to take my 4th ski trip of the season for my flight to be ruined by misbehaved swine nor misbehaved children. If the masses desire to fly with their children and animals, they should be assigned their own flights, and leave the rest of us to our own flights!"
[effect] some plane cabins are louder than the engines whilst others resemble libraries






cabin

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 5:59 am
by Baggieland
The topic of support animals being allowed on planes is possibly a good one for an NS issue, in my opinion. However, in order to make this topic being of concern for the government, rather than the airlines, I suggest that you imply that an aircraft crashed because of an animal.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 6:13 am
by Tinhampton
Baggieland wrote:The topic of support animals being allowed on planes is possibly a good one for an NS issue, in my opinion. However, in order to make this topic being of concern for the government, rather than the airlines, I suggest that you imply that an aircraft crashed because of an animal.

This issue is about "whether or not animals should be allowed in the main cabin of planes." Given that plane hijackings have been reduced to almost zero since the doors between the cabin and the cockpit were hardened across all airlines, how do you suggest that this humble pig in "the main cabin" somehow contrived to crash the plane? Mike Tyson punched some random guy who smack-talked him on a plane the other week and it made the news; it is not inconceivable that a pig destroying others' belongings in the cabin would be similarly newsworthy or hence worthy of @@LEADER@@'s attention.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 5:38 pm
by Australian rePublic
Tinhampton wrote:
Baggieland wrote:The topic of support animals being allowed on planes is possibly a good one for an NS issue, in my opinion. However, in order to make this topic being of concern for the government, rather than the airlines, I suggest that you imply that an aircraft crashed because of an animal.

This issue is about "whether or not animals should be allowed in the main cabin of planes." Given that plane hijackings have been reduced to almost zero since the doors between the cabin and the cockpit were hardened across all airlines, how do you suggest that this humble pig in "the main cabin" somehow contrived to crash the plane? Mike Tyson punched some random guy who smack-talked him on a plane the other week and it made the news; it is not inconceivable that a pig destroying others' belongings in the cabin would be similarly newsworthy or hence worthy of @@LEADER@@'s attention.

I'm sorry Baggie, but I have to go with Timhampton here. The only way that a pig could crash a plane is by entering the cockpit. Considering that it's impossible for a human to deliberately access the cockpit without authorisation, a pig certainly wouldn't be able to enter it by accident. Yes, of coarse it's an airline issue, however, it's ultimately the government that makes laws with regards to who's allowed in the main cabin of a plane

Besides: this is based on real life precident

https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/indus ... disability.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:31 am
by Baggieland
Australian rePublic wrote:Yes, of coarse it's an airline issue, however, it's ultimately the government that makes laws with regards to who's allowed in the main cabin of a plane


Fair enough. Carry on.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 5:34 am
by Australian rePublic
bump

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:16 am
by Australian rePublic
Last call

PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2022 12:18 am
by Australian rePublic
Submitted