[Draft] Freedom from Information
Posted: Tue May 24, 2022 8:03 pm
The Issue:
After a reporter in your nation was recently told that @@HIS@@ request for government documents on the police response to large-scale protests surrounding the environmental impact of the @@CAPITAL@@ water treatment plant was told that they documents were classified and would take 500 years to be released, people have began to question the state of government transparency in @@NAME@@. While these sorts of things would generally be handled by the Department of Public Consultations, Red Tape, and Orthodontic Surgery, everyone seems to have disregarded this once again and crowded into your office.
(democratic nations only)
The Debate:
Option 1: "@@LEADER@@, this is patently ridiculous!" cries the journalist in question, @@RANDOMNAME@@, with @@HIS@@ pen in hand ready to scribble down your response. "Transparency is essential for maintaining @@DENONYMADJECTIVE@@ democracy, and this incident shows that it's seriously lacking around here. If a citizen requests government documents, the government should be required to hand them over - immediately. Otherwise, how else will we hold your government accountable?" @@HE@@ slinks off into the corner, muttering something about this all still being on the record.
Effect: other nations' spies rejoice upon discovering @@NAME@@'s "Ministry of Spilling the Beans"
Option 2: "Uh, hello, @@LEADER@@, ever heard of national security?" says your Intelligence Advisor @@RANDOMNAME@@, badge for "crustiest government official" firmly pinned to @@HIS@@ suit. "Military operations, nuclear threats, ugly hats, all of these things represent grave threats to everyone if made public. Frankly, the public can't be trusted with any government documents, and you should end these silly transparency efforts once and for all - loose lips sink ships after all, or whatever the kids say about national security issues nowadays. Oh, and for the record, we said 50 years, not 500." @@HE@@ places another report stamped TOP SECRET on your desk and slinks away into the shadows.
Effect: government spending is kept secret for "national security reasons"
Option 3: "Gee, @@LEADER@@, this 'freedom of information' seems awfully convenient for releasing... our version of the truth," mutters a mysterious cloaked stranger to your left. "In short, I think we should accept these requests, but respond with... special interpretations of the facts. 'Lies?' That's such a harsh word - and besides, nothing like a little false intelligence to disrupt our enemies, right?" The stranger suddenly disappears, but you notice that the top secret documents left by your Intelligence Officer have also mysteriously vanished.
Effect: it's hard to trust government of @@NAME@@'s new proclamation of the existence of the tooth fairy