Given events that have transpired since that issue was created like, 20 years ago, I gently suggest that banning Harry Potter books should be re-evaluated in light of more recent events, and should be slightly rebalanced to boost inclusiveness, niceness, compassion, and intelligence. I'm also not totally averse to adding a third option, although given the issue's seniority I might even be principally opposed with messing with it too much.
The contents of the book have not changed, so the effect of banning it should not change either.
If someone writes a new issue with an option to ban J. K. Rowling from social media or something like that, we'll cross that bridge when we find it.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria NationStates issues editors may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance. ༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།