NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] One Hell of a Weekend

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Debussy
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jun 19, 2019
Corrupt Dictatorship

[DRAFT] One Hell of a Weekend

Postby Debussy » Tue Aug 10, 2021 1:23 am

No idea if this is heading in a good direction. I would like some feedback.

[title] One Hell of A Weekend

[validity] recreational drugs are illegal, has a court system

[description] Your unruly nephew was arrested on Friday evening - on their birthday of all occasions - for passing a tracker who was letting them pass in a no passing zone. When your nephew was pulled over, the officer discovered a sizable amount of marijuana in the car. By the time they were brought to the jail, the judge who issues bail bonds had gone home, forcing him to stay in jail until the judge issued bail bonds on Monday afternoon. During their stay, the violent individual he was housed with assaulted him and he was then maced by guards when they attempted to end the assault. Furthermore, when your nephew refused to stop touching his eyes while attempting to find relief after being maced, the guards tied him to a restraint chair for several hours. Upon your nephew’s release, they have come to your office complaining about the entire ordeal.

[option] “This country and its stupid laws! Look at my face,” your nephew says, garnishing his black eye while continuing to rant. “Those guards, the person I was housed with, the food, by golly, the food, horrible! It is all broken. I couldn’t even ask for the time, seeing as I was in a room with no windows, without a threat from those guards on their 12-hour shifts. 12-hour shifts, really? Who thought of that? I hate everyone by the end of my 8-hour shift at McBurgers. I can’t imagine what the feeling is after 12, and that’s not even mentioning their power tripping! Didn’t you see that experiment about prison guards? They stopped after only 6 days, and I was in there for 3! Jails, prisons, those holes you keep people in need reform and they need it now! Violent criminals shouldn’t be housed with non-violent criminals, and the guards need their own restraints! You want to show the world how bad it is? All those cameras in all those jails and prisons need to be public property and publicly broadcasted. It’s called accountability.”

[effect] Prisoners and guards smile for the camera in their 24/7 Twitcher feeds

[option] “Look, it’s your nephew’s first offence, and I’ve already talked to the district attorney. I have your nephew lined up for pre-trial diversion, and they shouldn’t face any charges,” states your nephew’s lawyer, @@RANDOMNAME@@. “There is nothing wrong with the law. There is, however, something wrong with your nephew. I mean, what were they thinking? Just because that tracker was letting them pass doesn’t excuse them breaking the law, and, of course, having an illegal substance on them is a big no no. They pass a couple of drug tests and they are free to go” the lawyer says before stopping to cough as if they just smoked something.

[effect] the wheels of justice just keeps on turning

[option] “I have 25 other cases to deal with, what is this about?’ frustratingly questions the district attorney over speakerphone as you call them up. “Oh, that was your nephew? Well, let me tell you, all the crazy things I see in here day after day, I’d rather not deal with small time offenders like your nephew, but that is the law - right now anyway. Why not just legalize recreational drugs so that I don’t have to keep up with the small time fries? It’d certainly help clear up the backlog we have here.”

[effect] red rimmed eyes are on the raise

“If the judge was issuing bail bonds throughout the weekend, your nephew would have to had to endure none of this,” proclaims your Minister of Reform, @@RANDOMNAME@@, peering into your office. “These ‘judges’ have far to much discretion on how they go about things, anyway, and most of them are elected - if you can believe that. We need tighter controls over how they go about their daily business, controls that favor the people subject to their discretion.”

[effect] burnt-out judges issue rulings with one eye open
Last edited by Debussy on Tue Aug 10, 2021 2:25 am, edited 12 times in total.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25677
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Tue Aug 10, 2021 4:41 am

This assumes too much that @@NAME@@ uses the USA's legal system
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
I would love to commission infrastructure in Australia. If anyone knows how I, as a lay person, could do so, please TG me. I'm dead serious
We're closer in time to 2050 than 1950

Wonderful Song Quotes

18 Published Issues, 1 Published WA Resolution

User avatar
Debussy
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jun 19, 2019
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Debussy » Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:02 pm

Australian rePublic wrote:This assumes too much that @@NAME@@ uses the USA's legal system

How do you write any issue about how justice works without assuming its one thing or another? The harry porter book issue assume my nation has even read the book. I'm trying to understand where the assumptions stop and start.
Last edited by Debussy on Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Verdant Haven
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 1861
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Verdant Haven » Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:00 pm

Don't be dissuaded - it's ok to make some assumptions for the sake of story. Many of our issues are based on the systems found in various countries around the world, and they work just fine. Focus on the story and writing, and you've probably got good potential here.

--

As far as the dilemma, it seems like the question of when bonds are issued (which I presume is what Aussie was trying to get at) is more of a justification for the incident to have occurred than the actual point of the issue. That point is a bit scattered.

Taking a look at the options:

- Option 1 is about prison conditions
- Option 2 is about... I'm not sure. What does this do?
- Option 3 is about legalizing drugs
- Option 4 is about judicial oversight

These four options basically address four different questions (or three different questions and a 'huh?'). See if you can really focus in on what the dilemma is, and then tighten up the options so that all of the speakers are addressing that dilemma. If the question is about when bonds are issued, most of the speakers should be arguing for or against the present situation vis-à-vis bonds. If the question is about prison conditions or abuse by prison guards, the speakers should be focusing on that. The text of the issue can be shorter - we don't need a novel there. Just a sentence or two that quickly gets to the main point. For example: "After his latest high speed escapades and his resultant run-in with the law, your nephew found himself stuck in prison all weekend on drug charges, waiting for a judge to hold a bond hearing." Use the options to flesh out the story and make the arguments the speakers want to make.
Last edited by Verdant Haven on Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Verdant Haven

User avatar
Debussy
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jun 19, 2019
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Debussy » Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:02 pm

Verdant Haven wrote:Don't be dissuaded - it's ok to make some assumptions for the sake of story. Many of our issues are based on the systems found in various countries around the world, and they work just fine. Focus on the story and writing, and you've probably got good potential here.

--

As far as the dilemma, it seems like the question of when bonds are issued (which I presume is what Aussie was trying to get at) is more of a justification for the incident to have occurred than the actual point of the issue. That point is a bit scattered.

Taking a look at the options:

- Option 1 is about prison conditions
- Option 2 is about... I'm not sure. What does this do?
- Option 3 is about legalizing drugs
- Option 4 is about judicial oversight

These four options basically address four different questions (or three different questions and a 'huh?'). See if you can really focus in on what the dilemma is, and then tighten up the options so that all of the speakers are addressing that dilemma. If the question is about when bonds are issued, most of the speakers should be arguing for or against the present situation vis-à-vis bonds. If the question is about prison conditions or abuse by prison guards, the speakers should be focusing on that. The text of the issue can be shorter - we don't need a novel there. Just a sentence or two that quickly gets to the main point. For example: "After his latest high speed escapades and his resultant run-in with the law, your nephew found himself stuck in prison all weekend on drug charges, waiting for a judge to hold a bond hearing." Use the options to flesh out the story and make the arguments the speakers want to make.

Option 2 was the do-nothing, things stay the same option, but I guess that is what the dismiss button is for. I love the feedback. It's great. Thank you. Do you mind if I use a bit of your example for the re-write?
Last edited by Debussy on Fri Aug 13, 2021 10:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Verdant Haven
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 1861
Founded: Feb 26, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Verdant Haven » Sat Aug 14, 2021 6:50 am

Debussy wrote:Option 2 was the do-nothing, things stay the same option, but I guess that is what the dismiss button is for.


That's exactly right! Options need to have an effect - dismiss is for ignoring it.

Debussy wrote:I love the feedback. It's great. Thank you. Do you mind if I use a bit of your example for the re-write?


Please feel free to do so.
- Verdant Haven


Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Azmenistanian

Advertisement

Remove ads