NATION

PASSWORD

(DRAFT) 'Nuclear Plants aren't New or Clear' Protestors say

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Nakosa
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Aug 02, 2020
Democratic Socialists

(DRAFT) 'Nuclear Plants aren't New or Clear' Protestors say

Postby Nakosa » Tue Jun 29, 2021 6:32 pm

Description: A damming report into the state of the nations nuclear power stations reveal that many power plants use outdated technology and are rarely serviced, causing radioactivity to seep into water supplies and the surrounding area, endangering both nuclear workers and civilians.

Option 1: "There's no way I'm going to live near or work in a faulty nuclear plant!" protests @@RANDOMNAME@@, head chief of the 'Nuclear Union stops Krappy Energy' union. "If one of these things went off, entire cities or even regions would be devastated! Please fix our nuclear technology, or we'll all be walking around with our faces melting off!"
Fallout: @@NAME@@'s nuclear power plants are required to have touchscreen panels.

Option 2: "Even with complicated technology, nuclear reactors are extremely dangerous," complains your environmental cousin, @@RANDOMNAME@@. "And any waste is often stored poorly. We should unplug nuclear power completely and ban it. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to be at an oil rig protest in Maxtopia in two hours." @@HE@@ speed-walks away while quickly scribbling something on a cardboard sign.
Fallout: Futures are unclear for banned nuclear power stations.

Option 3: You receive an email from the CEO of well-known soda manufacturer, Eckie-Ecola. "I have an idea to make profit out of this problem. We could take that radioactive water, add some sugar and artificial colours, flavours and preservatives, and ship it all over @@REIGON@@! Of course, we'd relay a little money back to the government, if desired, and you'd need to bend the rules to make this legal, but who cares?"
Fallout: Critics say Eckie-Ecola's new '@@NAME@@ Nuclear' flavour has explosive flavour.

What do y'all think?

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21281
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Wed Jun 30, 2021 2:34 am

Re your option 3: See issue #156 , option 2_ viewtopic.php?f=13&t=88#156
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Nakosa
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Aug 02, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby Nakosa » Wed Jun 30, 2021 2:38 pm

Bears Armed wrote:Re your option 3: See issue #156 , option 2_ viewtopic.php?f=13&t=88#156

I can see what you mean, but option 2 of issue #156 makes profit out of toxic waste in general (e.g. noxious by-products, not just radioactive water) by putting it into the water supply (not turning it into an Ecola flavour). The idea is mostly the same, (making profit off dangerous consumables) just different specifics.


Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ballotonia, Kaschovia, Potenzia, Rudastan, Southland, Yjlom

Advertisement

Remove ads