NationStates

Issue Validaty: Television must be banned, nation must have No Dissent and State Press policies enabled.

Description: Protests have been popping up since @@NAME@@ banned television, and now you have decided to take action. As protestors throw popcorn outside the capital building demanding to bring back popular shows such as Providence and Jennifer Government, you and your government officials discuss about bringing back television to @@NAME@@.

Option 1: "The answer is simple: NO!" says your Minister of Health @@RANDOMNAME@@. Our studies have shown that television can ruin your body and brain. Not only that, we tested it 4 times for those radicals and all of our results supported our hypothesis! We must keep television banned, whether they want it or not!"

Summary: no minutes of television a day keeps the police away.

Option 2 Validaty: Must not have all electronics banned.

Option 2: "She has a point," says your advisor @@RANDOMNAME@@. "But it shouldn't stop there. We must ban all electronics! They have caused a problem to all @@DENONYMPLURAL@@. And today we are going to end this horrible practice! Lets do it for @@NAME@@!

Summary: the only way to uncover the enemy's plans is by guessing.

Option 3: Suddenly, a window breaks due to an overload of popcorn. The founder of the National Television and Recording Association, @@RANDOMNAME@@, climbs up to your office and enters through your window. "First of all, sorry for your window," @@HE@@ says. But ignore it for now, as we @@DENONYMPLURAL@@ have a bigger problem: the ban on television. We must unban television if you like it or not! It doesn't matter if we lose a few quips; just give us freedom!" The crowd then cheers.

Summary: @@CAPITAL@@ has once again become a popular place for filming.

Trotterdam wrote:I don't believe there is an issue for banning television?

Trotterdam wrote:I don't believe there is an issue for banning television?

Nooooooooooooooo wrote:

Trotterdam wrote:I don't believe there is an issue for banning television?

He could mean the No Internet policy, but I personally think the validity should be that they must not have No Dissent and State Press enabled

Traden wrote:

Issue Validaty: Television must be banned, nation must have No Dissent and State Press policies enabled.

Description: Protests have been popping up since @@NAME@@ banned television, and now you have decided to take action. As protestors throw popcorn outside the capital building demanding to bring back popular shows such as Providence and Jennifer Government, you and your government officials discuss about bringing back television to Traden.

Option 1: "The answer is simple: NO!" says your Minister of Health @@RANDOMNAME1@@. Our studies have shown that television can ruin your body and brain. Not only that, we tested it 4 times for those radicals and all of our results supported our hypothesis! We must keep television banned, whether they want it or not!"

Summary: no minutes of television a day keeps the police away.

Option 2 Validaty: Must not have all electronics banned.

Option 2: "She has a point," says your advisor @@RANDOMNAME2@@. "But it shouldn't stop there. We must ban all electronics! They have caused a problem to all @@DENONYMPLURAL@@. And today we are going to end this horrible practice! Lets do it for @@NAME@@!

Summary: the only way to uncover the enemy's plans is by guessing.

Option 3: Suddenly, a window breaks due to an overload of popcorn. The founder of the National Television and Recording Association, @@RANDOMNAME3@@, climbs up to your office and enters through your window. "First of all, sorry for your window," @@HE@@ says. But ignore it for now, as we @@DENONYMPLURAL@@ have a bigger problem: the ban on television. We must unban television if you like it or not! It doesn't matter if we lose a few quips; just give us freedom!" The crowd then cheers.

Summary: @@CAPITAL@@ has once again become a popular place for filming.