NATION

PASSWORD

[Editor - Candle] Say Can You See?

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

[Editor - Candle] Say Can You See?

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Jan 28, 2021 6:14 am

There's an existing issue about tech monopolies, about Microsoft, which seems positively archaic now, but the recent moves against the Big Five have made it topical again. Was trying to find a fresh approach, and came up with this...


TITLE:
Say Can You See?

VALIDITY:
capitalism, no autarky, internet

DESCRIPTION:
It looks like your PA has added you to the "Boss Office" WotsOn group, and now your phone won't stop chiming. Before you silence notifications though, you can't help but notice that there appears to be a heated discussion around the high price of spectacles.

OPTION 1
"Rabe-Ann, Oakleech, Vague Eyewear... all these supposedly competing brands are owned by the Laxativottica conglomerate," complains your PA to the group. "Vertical integration and aggressive takeovers have left a handful of companies controlling eyewear manufacturing and retail, with the net result of 1000% mark-ups for consumers. This isn't a monopoly, strictly speaking, but an interdependent oligopoly. Antitrust agencies need more power to break up companies, to regulate and control mergers, to punish predatory pricing, and to maximise fair competition rather than purely focusing on monopolies. This isn't just specs, though, this is a sickness through the whole system! Don't you agree, @@LEADER@@? You're reading this right?"

OUTCOME:
lemonade stands that advertise they grew their own lemons are investigated by Monopolies and Mergers Commissioners

OPTION 2
"Look, @@LEADER@@ doesn't want to hear your big government claptrap," suggests another of your office juniors, who you recall keeps telling you about @@HIS@@ cousin's ethical organic woven-hemp company. "Rather than over-regulate, maybe we just need to help competitors get a foothold on the market Provide subisidies and government-sponsored promotion to any small companies who can show they're entering a marketplace that needs more competition, and we can start to break up megacorporate power. I mean, I hear that you can make pretty good glasses now out of locally sourced hemp twine. Let's think outside the box. Just saying."

OUTCOME:
hipster ministers read indie comics and drink artisanal coffee

OPTION 3 - NHS required
"Actually, the best way to deflate a market is to knock the bottom out of it," adds your Minister of Health, who is working from home today with a headache. "Have the state manufacture basic prescription spectacles, and distribute them through the national health service. Fashion-chasers and poseurs can still buy expensive brands if they want, but nobody will be forced to buy expensive lenses."

OUTCOME:
NHS spectacle frames come in three colours: beige, ochre and milk coffee

OPTION 4
"Hi there, @@LEADER@@, looks like you're talking about antitrust legislation! Let me help with that!" interjects Ploppy, the helpful App Assistant animation that's recently been added to WotsOn. "Did you know that high profit margins are good for the economy? "Big profits make for big companies, which drives employment, finances innovation and investment! Evidence shows that when you give tax breaks to the biggest companies, you let them grow bigger and stronger, and they bring more wealth to your nation! Only a really bad president could disagree, and we've banned him from all our platforms! Here's a great Insta-message video that explains this! I've also added you to a MyFace group on Laissez-Faire Capitalism, and added Marcus Sugarmountain to your exclusive contacts! Now enjoy these advertising messages, chosen specially for you! Because We Care (TM)!"

OUTCOME:
Big Brother is watching you (and selling your data metrics to Big Sister, Big Uncle and Big Auntie)
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Sun Jan 31, 2021 3:27 pm, edited 6 times in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Jutsa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5513
Founded: Dec 06, 2015
Capitalizt

Postby Jutsa » Thu Jan 28, 2021 9:04 am

I see, I see - an Editor - Candle, I see.

I'll also take this moment to point out we do have various issues involving monopolies and antitrust, being #41 (existing bloated corporation),
#330 (huge marts ruining small businesses, not exaaactly the same), #1067 (big business merger creating a monopoly),
and, perhaps more relevant here, one specifically about oligopoly in milk prices - #1160.
Plus technically #1174 but it doesn't exactly count imo

That said, if this is seen through different lenses as being substantially different in contacts - I mean, context, then do proceed.
You're welcome to telegram me any questions you have of the game. Unless I've CTE'd (ceased to exist) - then you physically can't do that.

Helpful* Got Issues? Links (Not Pinned In Forum) *mostly: >List of Issue-Related Lists | >Personal List of Issue Ideas | >List of Known Missing Issues/Options |
>Trotterdam's Issue Results/Policies Tracker | >Val's Bonus Stats | >Fauzjhia's Easter Egg Guide | >My Joke Drafts List | >Sherp's Author Rankings

Other Nifty Links: >Best-Ranked Useful Dispatches | >NSindex | >IA's WA Proposal Office | >Major Discord Links | >Trivia | >Cards Against NS | >Polls

"Remember, licking doorknobs is perfectly legal on other planets." - Ja Luıñaí

User avatar
Baizou
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Jan 02, 2018
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Baizou » Fri Jan 29, 2021 2:37 am

Ooh, this is pretty fun writing. I like the WotsOn groupchat as a framing device!

Two small critiques. First, I think "NHS" in Option 3 should be expanded to "National Health Service." Lots of American users won't make the connection, and even if they have universal healthcare as an option, they might not realize that would imply a government body called a National Health Service.

Second, Option 4 is very funny, but it's pretty long—or at least, it seems noticeably longer than most issue options I see. Could it be trimmed down at all? Maybe the "banned him from all our platforms" line? It's fun, but it's also not strictly necessary to get the point across. but Also, "which drives employment, finances innovation and investment" seems to be a comma splice; the comma could be replaced with an "and," or you could put another present-tense verb after "innovation" (though you'd then need to add a serial comma).
Premise: MT, VHSpunk, Japanese heritage, always 2004. | Factbook | Parties | Main Cast | Q&A | News
Stories From Baizou
"A Revolutionary Compromise," starring Meikawa Tomoko. | More to come?
Premier Fukushima
Ambassador Mizushima
Sovereign Haruto
Princess Consort Yuu
Rep. Meikawa
Councilor Akitamoto
CARRIE
Retired Sovereign Airi
Rep. Yutani
Flag features Ambassador Mizushima. OOC, user's pronouns are she/her.
It's 2004. MTish nation with videocassettepunk tech, Japanese heritage, minority of magic occult practitioners, casuistic Catholic plurality, sovereign deriving authority by Anglican coronation, and policymaking so byzantine parties wonder if it'd be easier to pursue agendas via international law.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27165
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:17 pm

Why would needing to joining a WhatsApp group be needed in order to discuss glasses prices? Why can't have these discussions in the lunch room or whatever?
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Sun Jan 31, 2021 3:27 pm

Australian rePublic wrote:Why would needing to joining a WhatsApp group be needed in order to discuss glasses prices? Why can't have these discussions in the lunch room or whatever?


Because there's a second level here, referring to the Big Tech monopolies. Facebook owns the four most downloaded apps of the decade, and one of them is WhatsApp,
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Sun Jan 31, 2021 3:29 pm

Baizou wrote:Two small critiques. First, I think "NHS" in Option 3 should be expanded to "National Health Service." Lots of American users won't make the connection, and even if they have universal healthcare as an option, they might not realize that would imply a government body called a National Health Service.


I'll change the draft above.

Second, Option 4 is very funny, but it's pretty long—or at least, it seems noticeably longer than most issue options I see. Could it be trimmed down at all? Maybe the "banned him from all our platforms" line? It's fun, but it's also not strictly necessary to get the point across. but Also, "which drives employment, finances innovation and investment" seems to be a comma splice; the comma could be replaced with an "and," or you could put another present-tense verb after "innovation" (though you'd then need to add a serial comma).


I thought that too as I wrote it. The option was written without the Trump twitter ban reference, and that was then added in, and I worried I'd messed up the flow.

Think you may be right, may revise that shortly.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27165
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:19 am

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Why would needing to joining a WhatsApp group be needed in order to discuss glasses prices? Why can't have these discussions in the lunch room or whatever?


Because there's a second level here, referring to the Big Tech monopolies. Facebook owns the four most downloaded apps of the decade, and one of them is WhatsApp,

Oh, okay
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads