NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Tobacco Industry's Future Looking Cloudy

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Dabarastan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Jul 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] Tobacco Industry's Future Looking Cloudy

Postby Dabarastan » Sat May 16, 2020 6:47 am

Must not have: No Smoking, Autarky, Socialism

The Issue:

Draft 2:

After two quarters of rapidly falling profits, a group of angry @@DEMONYM@@ tobacco industry representatives have stormed your office demanding government action.

1. "Here's yer problem," snarls an angry tobacco farmer amidst a cloud of smoke. "All them retailers keep importin' cheap cigarettes from Brasilistan – but it's nothin' but low-quality dirt tobacco. Then they're sellin' 'em for half the price they can charge for our fine @@DEMONYM@@ tobacco products! Can't you just slap a tariff on the imported cigarettes and subsidise locally-grown tobacco?"
Effect: locally-made cigarettes come with @@LEADER@@'s tick of approval

2. "Hear! Hear!" bellows another farmer, finely dressed in a tuxedo complete with top hat, while refilling his pipe. "But, dear fellow, why not take it one step further? If the government were to implement a wide-scale ban on all imports, across all industries, our domestic companies would thrive! Oh, we could herald in a new age of self-sufficient prosperity!"
Adds: Autarky
Effect: inbound cargo carriers are being turned back upon arrival

3. "No, no, no... uh, one second," interjects @@RANDOMNAME@@, CEO of Imperium Tobacco Corporation, before breaking into a short coughing fit. "The real problem is those vape pens. Haven't you heard? Kids are coming home and they're saying 'Mom, I wanna vape!' Ban the vapes, and the kids will have no choice but to return to buying traditional, flavoursome tobacco products." @@HE@@ takes a long draw from @@HIS@@ cigarette, "Mmm, smooth..."
Effect: children tend to now chew tobacco in class rather than gum

4. Your Health Minister enters the room and opens a window. "For goodness sake," @@HE@@ sighs. "Vaporisers, cigarettes, chewing tobacco; it doesn't matter! It's all bad for you! Why don't we put health before the economy for once and outlaw smoking products for good?" @@HE@@ takes a bite from the chocolate bar on your desk before leaving.
Adds: No Smoking
Effect: the livelihoods of the nation’s tobacco farmers have gone up in smoke


Draft 1:
After two quarters of rapidly falling profits, a group of angry @@DEMONYM@@ tobacco industry representatives have stormed your office demanding government action.

1) “Here’s yer problem,” snarls an angry tobacco farmer amidst a cloud of smoke, “All them retailers keep importin’ cheap cigarettes from Brasilistan – but it’s nothin’ but low-quality dirt tobacco. Then they’re sellin’ ‘em for half the price they can charge for our fine @@DEMONYM@@ tobacco products! Can’t you just slap a tariff on the imported cigarettes and subsidise locally-grown tobacco?”
Effect: locally-made cigarettes are cheaper than milk and bread.

2) “Hear! Hear!” bellows a finely-dressed, top-hat-wielding second farmer while refilling his pipe, “But, dear fellow, why not take it one step further? If the government were to implement a wide-scale ban on all imports, across all industries, our domestic companies would thrive! Oh, we could herald in a new age of self-sufficient prosperity!”
Adds: Autarky
Effect: there is a ban on the importation of any foreign good.

3) “No, no, no... uh, one second,” interjects @@RANDOMNAME@@, CEO of Imperium Tobacco Corporation, before breaking into a short coughing fit, “The problem is those vape pens. Haven’t you heard? Kids are coming home and they’re saying ‘Mom, I wanna vape!’ Ban the vapes, and the kids will have no choice but to return to buying traditional, flavoursome tobacco products.” @@HE@@ takes a long draw from @@HIS@@ cigarette, “Mmm, smooth...”
Effect: the government approves of the recent uptick in cigarettes sales amongst children.

4) Your Health Minister enters the room and opens a window. “For goodness sake,” @@HE@@ sighs, “Vaporisers, cigarettes, chewing tobacco; it doesn’t matter! It’s all bad for you! Why don’t we put health before the economy for once and outlaw smoking products for good?” He takes a bite from the chocolate bar on your desk before leaving.
Adds: No Smoking
Effect: smoking is prohibited.
Last edited by Dabarastan on Tue May 19, 2020 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27167
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Sat May 16, 2020 3:42 pm

Why wouldn't the unsuccessful tabacco companies move their manufacturing to Brasilistan?
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious

User avatar
Dabarastan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Jul 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Dabarastan » Sat May 16, 2020 5:58 pm

Australian rePublic wrote:Why wouldn't the unsuccessful tabacco companies move their manufacturing to Brasilistan?

That may naturally happen, or may already be happening. But I thought about it, and figured that having that as an option (letting the free market take its course) would be effectively taking no action at all. To prevent things like this is why the industry reps have gathered in leader's office.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27167
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Sat May 16, 2020 9:52 pm

Dabarastan wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Why wouldn't the unsuccessful tabacco companies move their manufacturing to Brasilistan?

That may naturally happen, or may already be happening. But I thought about it, and figured that having that as an option (letting the free market take its course) would be effectively taking no action at all. To prevent things like this is why the industry reps have gathered in leader's office.

No, you get it. The tabacco factories are moving off shore and the factory employees have the shits
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious

User avatar
Dabarastan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Jul 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Dabarastan » Mon May 18, 2020 6:26 am

Australian rePublic wrote:
Dabarastan wrote:That may naturally happen, or may already be happening. But I thought about it, and figured that having that as an option (letting the free market take its course) would be effectively taking no action at all. To prevent things like this is why the industry reps have gathered in leader's office.

No, you get it. The tabacco factories are moving off shore and the factory employees have the shits

Is there anything else I should be looking at changing here then?

User avatar
SherpDaWerp
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 1895
Founded: Mar 02, 2016
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby SherpDaWerp » Mon May 18, 2020 5:13 pm

Dabarastan wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:No, you get it. The tabacco factories are moving off shore and the factory employees have the shits

Is there anything else I should be looking at changing here then?

Well, yes. Don't rush submission! There's no harm in leaving your draft out for a couple weeks worth of feedback - if you're going for the contest, it doesn't end for almost another 4 weeks, and if you're just drafting to author an issue then you have unlimited time. More time = more feedback = better draft!

For minor nitpicks, smart quotes ( “ ” ) need to be replaced with dumb quotes ( " " ) and effect lines don't have full stops (or periods) on the end.

For slightly less minor things - your effect lines need work. Most of them are nothing more than restatements of the decision that you've made - "smoking is prohibited" doesn't have any hint of humor or wit, it's just a statement of the decision. Effect lines like your used to be the standard, decades ago, but nowadays effect lines are typically used to make jokes or funny statements.
  • "high-cocoa chocolate cigars only appear on the black market" - Effect 4
  • "cigarette companies' profits have disappeared in a puff of smoke" - Effect 4
  • "preschool classrooms no longer have smoke detectors" - Effect 3
  • "preschoolers need smoko twice a day" - Effect 3
You're welcome to use any of those verbatim or modify them as you wish. See if you can come up with some better effect lines for Options 1 and 2.

Other feedback:
"bellows a finely-dressed, top-hat-wielding second farmer" - You don't wield a top hat, you wear it, and "second farmer" is odd. Try and re-word their introduction as "another farmer" or a different character altogether.
" @@HE@@ takes a long draw from @@HIS@@ cigarette, “Mmm, smooth...” " - @@HE@@ needs a dialogue statement here, like "moans", "mumbles" or "utters"
Became an editor on 18/01/23 techie on 29/01/24

Rampant statistical speculation from before then is entirely unofficial

User avatar
Dabarastan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Jul 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Dabarastan » Tue May 19, 2020 3:50 am

SherpDaWerp wrote:
Dabarastan wrote:Is there anything else I should be looking at changing here then?

Well, yes. Don't rush submission! There's no harm in leaving your draft out for a couple weeks worth of feedback - if you're going for the contest, it doesn't end for almost another 4 weeks, and if you're just drafting to author an issue then you have unlimited time. More time = more feedback = better draft!

For minor nitpicks, smart quotes ( “ ” ) need to be replaced with dumb quotes ( " " ) and effect lines don't have full stops (or periods) on the end.

For slightly less minor things - your effect lines need work. Most of them are nothing more than restatements of the decision that you've made - "smoking is prohibited" doesn't have any hint of humor or wit, it's just a statement of the decision. Effect lines like your used to be the standard, decades ago, but nowadays effect lines are typically used to make jokes or funny statements.
  • "high-cocoa chocolate cigars only appear on the black market" - Effect 4
  • "cigarette companies' profits have disappeared in a puff of smoke" - Effect 4
  • "preschool classrooms no longer have smoke detectors" - Effect 3
  • "preschoolers need smoko twice a day" - Effect 3
You're welcome to use any of those verbatim or modify them as you wish. See if you can come up with some better effect lines for Options 1 and 2.

Other feedback:
"bellows a finely-dressed, top-hat-wielding second farmer" - You don't wield a top hat, you wear it, and "second farmer" is odd. Try and re-word their introduction as "another farmer" or a different character altogether.
" @@HE@@ takes a long draw from @@HIS@@ cigarette, “Mmm, smooth...” " - @@HE@@ needs a dialogue statement here, like "moans", "mumbles" or "utters"


Thanks for the detailed feedback. I've tried to take it all on board and I've now updated the post with a second draft.

User avatar
Dabarastan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Jul 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Dabarastan » Tue Jun 09, 2020 7:43 am

I'm gonna just bump this.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads