by Nistriabar » Wed May 06, 2020 8:13 am
by Trotterdam » Wed May 06, 2020 2:44 pm
What if @@ANIMAL@@ is already a bird, or worse, one with "bird" in its name?Nistriabar wrote:the rare @@DEMONYM@@ @@ANIMAL@@ bird
I'd make this validity for the relevant option only, not the whole issue.Nistriabar wrote:Validity: Genetic modification legal
Three too many? How much is that? Who decides what's a "reasonable number"?Nistriabar wrote:Option 2: Overhearing the conversation your aunt, who coincidentally lives with three too many cats interjects;
This requires legal internet.Nistriabar wrote:Effect: Internet sites cry out in horror as their favorite sources of content are exterminated en masse.
The last option is actually a good counterpoint to #1007's last option.Nistriabar wrote:The closest other issues i could find are 431 and 1007 but i don't think the above contradicts either, hopefully haven't missed any that do.
by Frieden-und Freudenland » Wed May 06, 2020 3:01 pm
by Trotterdam » Wed May 06, 2020 3:13 pm
by Lelscrep » Wed May 06, 2020 4:07 pm
advantage... Lets
@@RANDOMNAME@@ chimes in. "We
by Ko-oren » Thu May 07, 2020 2:12 am
by Australian rePublic » Thu May 07, 2020 5:14 am
by Nistriabar » Thu May 07, 2020 6:08 am
by Trotterdam » Thu May 07, 2020 2:23 pm
Maybe if they're tigersAustralian rePublic wrote:''Cats have caused the extinction of emu birds"- fat chance
by Candlewhisper Archive » Sat May 09, 2020 5:33 pm
"Things being said," says speaker, described in some way here. "Elaboration here, and then a conclusion."
by Australian rePublic » Sat May 09, 2020 7:30 pm
by Trotterdam » Sat May 09, 2020 8:28 pm
Why?Candlewhisper Archive wrote:I'd lose 1-2 options though,
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon May 11, 2020 1:08 am
by Australian rePublic » Mon May 11, 2020 5:34 am
by Australian rePublic » Tue May 12, 2020 2:43 am
Trotterdam wrote:Because birds that exist everywhere aren't endangered?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement