I would consider Australian Republic's suggestion of making the person a hippie who dislikes clothes and bathing for ideological reasons, rather than being unable to afford them. Even if such people are rare, it doesn't stretch disbelief for there to be one of them causing a ruckus, and it removes all "but then how could/couldn't he afford ___?" quibbles.SherpDaWerp wrote:Most of the comments so far seem to be about the core premise of the issue, and not minor things, so I might have a look at how it's presented in the description to see if it could be put better for the 4th version.