Issues don't make sense.
Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 10:06 am
Civil rights and political freedom both fell by 14% for choosing the option to not show a terrorist face and publish his manifesto, which undoubtedly was full of hateful and violent things that only served to inspire further terrorism and cause more harm. Above all that, the issue was never clear cut AND half of the options didn't make logical sense to the issue at hand. It was either treat terrorists as celebrities or treat them as terrorists, and treating them like terrorist somehow lowers your civil rights and political freedom? Above all that, the worst part is, if you pick don't show their face, it says, "genocide is seen as a topic best avoided in history lessons." Nowhere did the issue say anything about genocide, history lessons, or anything relating to the effect.
I have only one question; why? How does that affect civil and political freedom by choosing to not publish a terrorist's hateful manifesto and face? In fact, it affects no one besides terrorist and terrorism. By this issue logic, anyone who won't show a terrorist's face, after he murdered hundreds of people likely, hates civil and political freedoms? Yeah, it doesn't make logical sense. In fact, most of Nationstate issues nowadays don't make any sense and lack any middle ground option (Which they shouldn't because most issues are now just a guessing game of "I wonder if this issue which sounds good will have a completely different effect".
Seriously, my recent will to even want to answer issues is at an all-time low because I continuously think they'll do nothing but harm. Even ones that seem harmless often have the biggest effect on your nation. Like wanting to clear out a slum only gives you four options; let a private company tear it down and keep those who lived in it as slaves, leave it be, paint it, or increase welfare. Not of those options have a middle ground or a logical option simply called, "Tear it down and build new housing paid for by the government." Seriously, it's not that difficult to add a middle ground logical option to issues. I could do it. In fact, I've made and summited issues with a middle ground option.
Anyways, the point of this post is to point out how stupid and senseless issues have become and how their decisions sometimes don't match up with their effects. I want to play Nationstates, not a guessing game.
I have only one question; why? How does that affect civil and political freedom by choosing to not publish a terrorist's hateful manifesto and face? In fact, it affects no one besides terrorist and terrorism. By this issue logic, anyone who won't show a terrorist's face, after he murdered hundreds of people likely, hates civil and political freedoms? Yeah, it doesn't make logical sense. In fact, most of Nationstate issues nowadays don't make any sense and lack any middle ground option (Which they shouldn't because most issues are now just a guessing game of "I wonder if this issue which sounds good will have a completely different effect".
Seriously, my recent will to even want to answer issues is at an all-time low because I continuously think they'll do nothing but harm. Even ones that seem harmless often have the biggest effect on your nation. Like wanting to clear out a slum only gives you four options; let a private company tear it down and keep those who lived in it as slaves, leave it be, paint it, or increase welfare. Not of those options have a middle ground or a logical option simply called, "Tear it down and build new housing paid for by the government." Seriously, it's not that difficult to add a middle ground logical option to issues. I could do it. In fact, I've made and summited issues with a middle ground option.
Anyways, the point of this post is to point out how stupid and senseless issues have become and how their decisions sometimes don't match up with their effects. I want to play Nationstates, not a guessing game.