Title: Ahh! Sweet Unicameralism!
Description: The @@demonymadjective@@ Civil Service has found an abundance of errors and overlaps in many legislative bills and policies as of late. Has unicameralism been strained?
Validity: Must have a unicameral legislative body
Option 1: "Come on! Is this really an issue worth debating?" arrogantly questions @@randomname@@, a disdainful lawmaker and known supporter of bicameralism. "You don't need to be a politician to know these problems started as soon as we abolished the upper house. Bring back our Senate, it's the most logical solution!"
Effect: the senate is in a standstill on what constitutes a bill
Option 2: "Re-establishing the upper house will just take us back to square one," contends esteemed lawmaker @@randomname@@ while holding an 'I Hate Bicameralism!' cup. "I received word from the Civil Service that the main probable cause of these oversights in legislation is simply the result of low morale caused by the abolishment of the Senate. I propose we establish initiative programs within the house, remind our good serving legislators why they do what they do and maybe even boosted benefits as a countermeasure."
Effect: @@leader@@ is finding more raise requests on their desk than actual bills
Option 3: You spot an unfamiliar person behind your desk, "I have the perfect guaranteed solution ladies and gents!" he says while shredding your important papers. "Having a government brings nothing but meaningless debates and disputes that never seem to end. Well, let's end it all now by not having a government. Go ahead, call me crazy, you know you want to @@leader@@, you're tired are you not?"
Effect: @@leader@@s desk is as empty as their soul