Advertisement
by Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:22 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Jan 29, 2019 9:24 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:58 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Here we go:
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=423884
Doesn't look like the draft ever finished, perhaps because I was taking potshots at it.
For the record, this draft here is far stronger.
by Bears Armed » Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:56 am
by Aclion » Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:47 pm
by Bears Armed » Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:36 am
by Far Tholk » Mon Feb 04, 2019 10:51 am
The first sentence here reads weirdly. Would this be better?Bears Armed wrote:[Option]″That old ′Right of Turbary′ applies not only to turf but to peat — which is a significantly better fuel — as well, doesn′t it?″ enquires @@RANDOMNAME@@, your Minister of Natural Resources. ″This gives me an idea. There’s LOTS of peat up in the northern moors, so if you pass a law declaring the State to have this Right there, regardless of who actually owns the land itself, then we could quarry it for use in those new power stations we need instead of having to import more oil…″
[Validity]nation does not use nuclear power (and has at least a moderate level of Primitiveness?)
[Effect]the hills are alive to the sound of excavators[/box]
You might also strike 'Natural' from the Minister's title; Minister of Resources sounds fine, and less conservationist."That old 'Right of Turbary' applies not only to turf but to peat, as well, doesn't it?" enquires @@RANDOMNAME@@, your Minister of Natural Resources. "This gives me an idea. Peat's a much better fuel, and there's LOTS of it up in the northern moors, so...
by Bears Armed » Tue Feb 05, 2019 8:26 am
YEs, that would be better... although I'll insert "than turf" just after the "better fuel" in this version.Far Tholk wrote:The first sentence here reads weirdly. Would this be better?Bears Armed wrote:[Option]″That old ′Right of Turbary′ applies not only to turf but to peat — which is a significantly better fuel — as well, doesn′t it?″ enquires @@RANDOMNAME@@, your Minister of Natural Resources. ″This gives me an idea. There’s LOTS of peat up in the northern moors, so if you pass a law declaring the State to have this Right there, regardless of who actually owns the land itself, then we could quarry it for use in those new power stations we need instead of having to import more oil…″
[Validity]nation does not use nuclear power (and has at least a moderate level of Primitiveness?)
[Effect]the hills are alive to the sound of excavators[/box]"That old 'Right of Turbary' applies not only to turf but to peat, as well, doesn't it?" enquires @@RANDOMNAME@@, your Minister of Natural Resources. "This gives me an idea. Peat's a much better fuel, and there's LOTS of it up in the northern moors, so...
'Minister of Resources' sounds too generic and all-encompassing to me, I'd rather leave the 'Natural' in.Far Tholk wrote:You might also strike 'Natural' from the Minister's title; Minister of Resources sounds fine, and less conservationist.
Oops! Thank you, I'll fix that.Far Tholk wrote:Also: "The hills are alive with the sound of" excavators.
by Bears Armed » Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:22 am
by Bears Armed » Sun Feb 10, 2019 4:34 am
by Australian rePublic » Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:48 am
by Bears Armed » Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:59 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Good Luck!
Far Tholk wrote:Good luck! I really like this Issue and I'm glad I could help you work on it.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement