Australian rePublic wrote:Option 3- near sightedness has always existed, but became a more significant problem since the invention of the printing press. There a was a far greater increase in near sightedness amongst literate non-slaves with the invention of books than there was with the invention of screens. If you wanna ban TVs, you gotta ban books too. In fact, banning books would probably do more good than banning TV, because most people sit far enough away from the TV to atleast stretch their eyes a little, whilst book readers have to remain close to their medium. The exception to this is CRT screens, which actively hurt your eyes in non-nearsightedness ways, but, you'd be hard pressed to find one these days. If you wanted to go down that path, keep in mind that it'd be neglible. The government would need to spend like $60000 to replace the 1500 or so which remain.
Okay, this would also make for a more interesting issue. I’ll see what I can do!
How would I make Option 1 less OTT?