Nope. Baxibot!
Advertisement
by ChUbBiesTnEss » Wed Jan 02, 2019 7:54 pm
by Chan Island » Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:41 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jan 04, 2019 1:56 pm
by Jutsa » Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:54 pm
Chan wrote:Looking at issue 6, I can see that there is a pretty legitimate idea going on there: big roads do in fact cut off sections of nature from each other.
Aussie wrote:Maybe you should feed it Jutsa's list of issue ideas. If a human won't tackle them, a bot might as well do it
by Trotterdam » Fri Jan 04, 2019 3:28 pm
Based on the images in this article, it seems like it's popular to do it the other way around.Jutsa wrote:2) Build bridges over the roads for wildlife to walk over
by New Excalibus » Fri Jan 04, 2019 3:33 pm
by Minoa » Sat Jan 05, 2019 7:07 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Maybe you should feed it Jutsa's list of issue ideas. If a human won't tackle them, a bot might as well do it
by Jutsa » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:16 am
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jan 05, 2019 10:29 am
Minoa wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Maybe you should feed it Jutsa's list of issue ideas. If a human won't tackle them, a bot might as well do it
It still has to be proof-read by an actual human. That coming from someone who is not totally opposed to AI, but insisting that humans operate it.
by Australian rePublic » Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:31 am
by Krychland » Thu Jan 10, 2019 8:50 am
by Xam Botty » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:06 am
Krychland wrote:ok yeah there is no way #7 was actually made by a robot (#6 is hecka suspicious too)
unless you edited them manually afterwards in which case maybe you should mention that?
by Trotterdam » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:12 am
by Pax Nerdvana » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:18 am
by Jutsa » Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:08 pm
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Jan 11, 2019 8:29 am
by Trotterdam » Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:59 pm
by Krychland » Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:21 pm
by Chan Island » Fri Jan 11, 2019 2:00 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by La Jem » Fri Jan 11, 2019 2:48 pm
Chan Island wrote:*Notes how the bot has written an issue that involves bots*
Skynet confirmed.
But otherwise that's pretty neat. I have no problems believing that draft 7 was written by your bot, and indeed still see plenty of room for improvement. Issues are very formulaic, which is different from a novel (hence why bots are still pretty poor at coming up with fiction stories- yet), but convenient for a robot.
Looking forward to seeing the next iteration. Want to feed it on a couple of my accidental duplicate drafts? I'll happily TG them to you.
by Trotterdam » Fri Jan 11, 2019 3:32 pm
Is there a way to give it more nuanced feedback? Because that's a pretty important part of how human authors get better.La Jem wrote:It then spits out something, depending on what template I tell it to use, and I then get to label it as a good job or a bad job. If it is bad, it reverts to the previous setting, if it is good, it keeps the current settings and tries again.
by La Jem » Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:57 pm
by The Sakhalinsk Empire » Fri Jan 11, 2019 7:03 pm
by United States of Natan » Fri Jan 11, 2019 7:30 pm
Then it's a lie. Everything Fox News says is a lie.
Even true things once said on Fox News become lies.
(Family Guy: Excellence in Broadcasting)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement