NATION

PASSWORD

[SUBMITTED 16/1/19] Dead Gay

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

[SUBMITTED 16/1/19] Dead Gay

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Dec 18, 2018 2:05 am

THIRD DRAFT:
TITLE:

Dead Gay

VALIDITY:

Homosexuality illegal, NO absence of copyright
Adult


DESCRIPTION:

Shock! Horror! Posthumously unearthed diaries have revealed that @@randommalename@@, a beloved composer of patriotic big band anthems, was secretly homosexual and had engaged in illegal homosexual relations. In retrospect, the titles of some of his compositions (such as "I Stand Behind The Sky", "Come on, Christopher" and "Bent But Unbroken") may have contained clues to this.

OPTION ONE

"So, @@surname(1)@@ was a deviant, eh?" muses Minister of Standardising Deviation, @@randomname@@. "If he was a kinky voyeur or a sexual predator, there'd be no question about rejecting his works. Being queer is as bad as those things, so we have to adopt the same attitude. Condemn him, ban his works, bury him in an unmarked grave, and salt the earth. Damn his filthy perversions!"

OUTCOME:

hummers must be careful about what comes out of their mouth


OPTION TWO

"That's not enough," interjects your Minister for Cultural Heterogeneity. "The entire genre of big band music is likely harbouring other closet homosexuals. We must ban that genre. In fact, we must ban any genre of music that is revealed to have homosexual influences in it. Straight music only, that is the path to cultural purity."

OUTCOME:

all music has been banned


OPTION THREE

"I'm not sure why I should be penalised for someone else's perversions," complains @@malerandomname@@, president of fan society The Big Band of Brothers. "For sure, gays or their inheritors should no longer be allowed to profit from fame, but we should still get to play their music. Seize all his compositions and place them in the public domain, and we get the right combination of punishment and preservation of culture."

OUTCOME:

the government maintains a public access archive of camp disco music


OPTION FOUR

"Look... if someone as well-respected as @@randomname(1)@@ turned out to be gay, then maybe not all gays are so bad," suggests your uncle, without looking up from his Musical Revue Monthly magazine. "He was decent enough to keep his private life private. Maybe we should say that people should be allowed to be queer if they want, as long as they don't make a song and dance about it. Ooh, look, they're talking about bringing Avenue Cute to @@CAPITAL@@. How fabulous!"

OUTCOME:

when it comes to real men it takes one to know one




SECOND DRAFT:
TITLE:

Dead Gay

VALIDITY:

Homosexuality illegal
Adult


DESCRIPTION:

Shock! Horror! Posthumously unearthed diaries have revealed that @@randommalename@@, a beloved composer of patriotic big band anthems, was secretly homosexual and had engaged in illegal homosexual relations. In retrospect, the titles of some of his compositions (such as "I Stand Behind The Sky", "Come on, Christopher" and "Bent But Unbroken") may have contained clues to this.

OPTION ONE

"So, @@surname(1)@@ was a deviant, eh?" muses Minister of Standardising Deviation, @@randomname@@. "If he was a kinky voyeur or a sexual predator, there'd be no question about rejecting his works. Being queer is as bad as those things, so we have to adopt the same attitude. Condemn him, ban his works, bury him in an unmarked grave, and salt the earth. Damn his filthy perversions!"

OUTCOME:

hummers must be careful about what comes out of their mouth


OPTION TWO

"That's not enough," interjects your Minister for Cultural Heterogeneity. "The entire genre of big band music is likely harbouring other closet homosexuals. We must ban that genre. In fact, we must ban any genre of music that is revealed to have homosexual influences in it. Straight music only, that is the path to cultural purity."


OUTCOME:

all music has been banned



OPTION THREE

"Look... if someone as well-respected as @@randomname(1)@@ turned out to be gay, then maybe not all gays are so bad," suggests your uncle, without looking up from his Musical Revue Monthly magazine. "He was decent enough to keep his private life private. Maybe we should say that people should be allowed to be queer if they want, as long as they don't make a song and dance about it. Ooh, look, they're talking about bringing Avenue Cute to @@CAPITAL@@. How fabulous!"

OUTCOME:

when it comes to real men it takes one to know one


OPTION FOUR

"Is anyone else wondering if there might be homosexuals hidden all around us?" asks Matt Hopkins, police Director of Probes and Deep Investigations, narrowing his eyes and gripping his truncheon suspiciously. "The possibility of closeted perverts all around makes me feel sick. We need a dedicated police force to investigate those of suspected aberrant sexuality. As for the punishment - burn them at the stake. Let unclean flesh turn to ash."

OUTCOME:

everyone loves a flaming homosexual

FIRST DRAFT:
TITLE:

Dead Gay

VALIDITY:

Homosexuality illegal
Adult


DESCRIPTION:

Shock! Horror! Posthumously unearthed diaries have revealed that @@randommalename@@, a beloved composer of patriotic big band anthems, was secretly homosexual. In retrospect, the titles of some of his compositions (such as "I Kiss The Sky", "A Rainbow Over @@NAME@@" and "Bent But Unbroken") may have contained a clue to this.

OPTION ONE

"So, @@surname(1)@@ was a deviant, eh?" muses Minister of Purity, @@randomname@@. "If he was a kiddy fiddler or a sexual predator, there'd be no question about rejecting his works. Being queer is as bad as those things, so we have to adopt the same attitude. Condemn him, ban his works, bury him in an unmarked grave, and salt the earth. Damn his filthy perversions!"

OUTCOME:

hummers must be careful about what comes out of their mouth


OPTION TWO

"That's not enough," interjects your Minister for Culture. "The entire genre of big band music is likely harbouring other closet homosexuals. We must ban that genre. In fact, we must ban any genre of music that is revealed to have homosexual influences in it. Straight music only, that is the path to cultural purity."


OUTCOME:

all music has been banned



OPTION THREE

"Look... if someone as well-respected as @@randomname(1)@@ turned out to be gay, then maybe not all gays are so bad," suggests your uncle, without looking up from his Musical Revue Monthly Review magazine. "He was decent enough to keep his private life private. Maybe we should say that people should be allowed to be queer if they want, as long as they don't make a song and dance about it. Ooh, look, they're talking about bringing Avenue Cute to @@CAPITAL@@. How fabulous!"

OUTCOME:

when it comes to real men it takes one to know one
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Wed Jan 16, 2019 5:39 am, edited 17 times in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Jutsa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5513
Founded: Dec 06, 2015
Capitalizt

Postby Jutsa » Tue Dec 18, 2018 8:59 am

:rofl:

I envy you your issues, CWA. Brilliant. :)
You're welcome to telegram me any questions you have of the game. Unless I've CTE'd (ceased to exist) - then you physically can't do that.

Helpful* Got Issues? Links (Not Pinned In Forum) *mostly: >List of Issue-Related Lists | >Personal List of Issue Ideas | >List of Known Missing Issues/Options |
>Trotterdam's Issue Results/Policies Tracker | >Val's Bonus Stats | >Fauzjhia's Easter Egg Guide | >My Joke Drafts List | >Sherp's Author Rankings

Other Nifty Links: >Best-Ranked Useful Dispatches | >NSindex | >IA's WA Proposal Office | >Major Discord Links | >Trivia | >Cards Against NS | >Polls

"Remember, licking doorknobs is perfectly legal on other planets." - Ja Luıñaí

User avatar
Hediacrana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Nov 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hediacrana » Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:27 am

Is this Tchaikovsky-inspired? I remember reading once that his Romeo and Juliet work possibly reflects his own experiences of forbidden love.

That as an aside; it looks good to me and I don't really have suggestions for improvement. Apart from the thought that maybe it would be interesting to have some zealot investigating @@Leader@@'s speeches for clues to the same effect.
'If you're not anti-war, then you're not fiscally conservative, and you're certainly not pro-life.'
Parent, spouse, leftist Christian and suspected witch.
She/her.

User avatar
The Sherpa Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 3222
Founded: Jan 15, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Sherpa Empire » Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:07 am

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:all music has been banned


Best effect line. :lol:
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།
Following new legislation in The Sherpa Empire, life is short but human kindness is endless.
Alternate IC names: Sherpaland, Pharak

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:09 am

Hediacrana wrote:Is this Tchaikovsky-inspired? I remember reading once that his Romeo and Juliet work possibly reflects his own experiences of forbidden love.


Absolutely, yes. Specifically the assertion by Putin that Russia can't be homophobic because they love Tchaikovsky.

That as an aside; it looks good to me and I don't really have suggestions for improvement. Apart from the thought that maybe it would be interesting to have some zealot investigating @@Leader@@'s speeches for clues to the same effect.


Hmm... that's potentially amusing. Maybe something the lines of a witchfinder general, looking for homosexuals, with the speaker acting suspicious of LEADER? Plenty of wordplay opportunity there with faggots, rooting out, flaming homosexuals. Will think on that.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:54 am

Okay, option 4 added in second draft. On second thoughts, steered away from joking around "faggot", as it's pretty offensive as slurs go, and the joke would be circular and weak anyway, given the (probably discredited) theories about the slur's etymology being related to burning gay people.
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Valentine Z
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13018
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Valentine Z » Tue Dec 18, 2018 1:57 pm

The Sherpa Empire wrote:
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:all music has been banned


Best effect line. :lol:


I'm just scared that one day we will actually go there and ban all forms of music just because of one incident. :P

For the issue itself, I like it so far! I think there could be another option to go further than Option 3? Maybe instead of just tolerating homosexuals, maybe encourage it. Though... saying this doesn't make much sense compared to what I have in mind.
Last edited by Valentine Z on Tue Dec 18, 2018 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Val's Stuff. ♡ ^_^ ♡ For You
If you are reading my sig, I want you to have the best day ever ! You are worth it, do not let anyone get you down !
Glory to De Geweldige Sierlijke Katachtige Utopia en Zijne Autonome Machten ov Valentine Z !
(✿◠‿◠) ☆ \(^_^)/ ☆

Issues Thread Photography Stuff Project: Save F7. Stats Analysis

The Sixty! Valentian Stories! Gwen's Adventures!

• Never trouble trouble until trouble troubles you.
• World Map is a cat playing with Australia.
Let Fate sort it out.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27167
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:09 pm

Option 3- don't you think the effect line makes light of burning people alive?
Hard-Core Centrist. Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right.
All in-character posts are fictional and have no actual connection to any real governments
You don't appreciate the good police officers until you've lived amongst the dregs of society and/or had them as customers
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
Issues and WA Proposals Written By Me |Issue Ideas You Can Steal
I want to commission infrastructure in Australia in real life, if you can help me, please telegram me. I am dead serious

User avatar
The Free Joy State
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16402
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Joy State » Wed Dec 19, 2018 2:12 am

The Sherpa Empire wrote:
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:all music has been banned


Best effect line. :lol:

I agree. That effect line made me laugh.

Concerned about the use of the phrase "kiddy fiddler" in an issue. It may be just me, but I don't like the idea of referencing paedophilia in an issue this overtly at all. I worry it opens the door to "it was done there, why not in my issue" arguments.

I'd personally be happier if that was cut and the line was rendered "if he was a sexual predator".

EDIT: Other than that concern, really love this issue.
Last edited by The Free Joy State on Wed Dec 19, 2018 2:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
"If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." - Toni Morrison

My nation does not represent my beliefs or politics.

User avatar
Gnejs
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 3316
Founded: May 11, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Gnejs » Wed Dec 19, 2018 2:49 am

Funny stuff right there. Impressive that you can keep it up and maintain quality.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:08 am

Valentine Z wrote:I'm just scared that one day we will actually go there and ban all forms of music just because of one incident. :P


My main worry is that new bans require new policies generally, and there's a ton of issues that would need a validity check against that ban. Still, will worry about that if we get there.

For the issue itself, I like it so far! I think there could be another option to go further than Option 3? Maybe instead of just tolerating homosexuals, maybe encourage it. Though... saying this doesn't make much sense compared to what I have in mind.


That's a great thought, and did consider that. What swayed me away was player population demographics and selection bias. That is, to get to this issue you need to be a nation that has actively chosen to ban homosexuality. That in mind, we probably don't need to present more than one option that reverses this position, whereas options that reinforce or modify that position need to have a greater presence.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:10 am

Concerned about the use of the phrase "kiddy fiddler" in an issue. It may be just me, but I don't like the idea of referencing paedophilia in an issue this overtly at all. I worry it opens the door to "it was done there, why not in my issue" arguments.


Yeah, honestly the line in my head was "if he was a pedo or a rapist", but obviously that would have been too much.

I'll change it to a "kinky voyeur or a sexual predator". Will modify draft 2 rather than putting a new draft for that change.
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Dec 19, 2018 4:11 am

Gnejs wrote:Funny stuff right there. Impressive that you can keep it up and maintain quality.


Viagra, mate.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:44 am

Perhaps refer to the musical theater loving uncle as a 'confirmed batchelor' as that tended to be the expression used to describe those chaps who never seemed to settle down with a woman, but chose instead to share their dwellings with a dear friend from school. It'd be in keeping with his general outlook on stuff as presented. A sort of don't ask don't tell attitude.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:56 am

Caracasus wrote:Perhaps refer to the musical theater loving uncle as a 'confirmed batchelor' as that tended to be the expression used to describe those chaps who never seemed to settle down with a woman, but chose instead to share their dwellings with a dear friend from school. It'd be in keeping with his general outlook on stuff as presented. A sort of don't ask don't tell attitude.


Could do that, though I'm not sure that's needed: it's pretty apparent already that he's secretly gay.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Wed Dec 19, 2018 8:22 am

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:
Caracasus wrote:Perhaps refer to the musical theater loving uncle as a 'confirmed batchelor' as that tended to be the expression used to describe those chaps who never seemed to settle down with a woman, but chose instead to share their dwellings with a dear friend from school. It'd be in keeping with his general outlook on stuff as presented. A sort of don't ask don't tell attitude.


Could do that, though I'm not sure that's needed: it's pretty apparent already that he's secretly gay.


Oh yeah, apologies I wasn't thinking that the character's sexuallity needed telegraphing any more, merely that it'd add more authenticity to the character's situation and what he's calling for. Legalization of the status quo.

I'd also suggest making it clear that the issue isn't his homosexuality, it's that he emgaged in homosexual acts. Perhaps have it that he had a gay lover. Even in real life seriously anti gay countries, homosexuality is very rarely illegal on paper. Rather taking part in homosexual acts is the criminal offense.
Last edited by Caracasus on Wed Dec 19, 2018 8:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Dec 19, 2018 9:06 am

Caracasus wrote:
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:
Could do that, though I'm not sure that's needed: it's pretty apparent already that he's secretly gay.


Oh yeah, apologies I wasn't thinking that the character's sexuallity needed telegraphing any more, merely that it'd add more authenticity to the character's situation and what he's calling for. Legalization of the status quo.

I'd also suggest making it clear that the issue isn't his homosexuality, it's that he emgaged in homosexual acts. Perhaps have it that he had a gay lover. Even in real life seriously anti gay countries, homosexuality is very rarely illegal on paper. Rather taking part in homosexual acts is the criminal offense.



Fair point. Have added "and had engaged in illegal homosexual relations."
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Jan 03, 2019 10:18 am

Last call on this one. Any other thoughts, anyone?

Have tweaked draft 2 minimally, to give the speakers better job titles. Also changed some of the song titles in the opening, and had the policeman (now male) grip his truncheon.
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Thu Jan 03, 2019 10:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Sacara
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1854
Founded: May 13, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Sacara » Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:11 am

I really like this issue. It's a fun premise, and we need more issues for the Heterosexual policy. Good job. :)
The Spacefaring Federation of Sacara
I spend most of my time in the Got Issues? sub-forum.
Issues That I've Authored (15)
Commended by SC #382
"Our Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you" - Neil deGrasse Tyson

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10541
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:56 pm

I wonder why artists turning out to be bad people should lead to boycotting their art, if it was actually good. I mean, just that you were bad doesn't mean that everything you did was bad. Maybe there'd be an issue about not wanting disgraced artists to continue making money off their fame (though that's not so much of an issue posthumously), but that can be solved by forcibly releasing the works into the public domain.

User avatar
Chan Island
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6824
Founded: Nov 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Chan Island » Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:24 pm

Trotterdam wrote:I wonder why artists turning out to be bad people should lead to boycotting their art, if it was actually good. I mean, just that you were bad doesn't mean that everything you did was bad. Maybe there'd be an issue about not wanting disgraced artists to continue making money off their fame (though that's not so much of an issue posthumously), but that can be solved by forcibly releasing the works into the public domain.


These are my thoughts too. Maybe the nation could adopt a kind of "well, we're not all perfect so let's enjoy the music but condemn the man" or some variation around it. A 1984 rewriting of history to make it seem like the composer was straight and destroying the journals is a particularly sinister variation that comes to mind.
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=513597&p=39401766#p39401766
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

User avatar
Sacara
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1854
Founded: May 13, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Sacara » Thu Jan 03, 2019 6:45 pm

I can see the points of the above two comments, and I think the addditom a revisionist option would be okay, but I like the issue as it is. If this did happen, especially in a society that goes as far to ban homosexual marriage, this would utterly ruin his reputation, hence the issue. I think it’s solid as is, personally.
The Spacefaring Federation of Sacara
I spend most of my time in the Got Issues? sub-forum.
Issues That I've Authored (15)
Commended by SC #382
"Our Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you" - Neil deGrasse Tyson

User avatar
Hediacrana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Nov 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hediacrana » Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:51 pm

FWIIW, I also think this is quite nice just as is.
'If you're not anti-war, then you're not fiscally conservative, and you're certainly not pro-life.'
Parent, spouse, leftist Christian and suspected witch.
She/her.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23650
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:37 am

Trotterdam wrote:I wonder why artists turning out to be bad people should lead to boycotting their art, if it was actually good. I mean, just that you were bad doesn't mean that everything you did was bad. Maybe there'd be an issue about not wanting disgraced artists to continue making money off their fame (though that's not so much of an issue posthumously), but that can be solved by forcibly releasing the works into the public domain.


Fair point, but real life seems to indicate that when someone is exposed for being, for example, a paedophile or rapist that tends to take their work out of circulation pretty rapidly. For example, while nobody has censored Gary Glitter, the revelation that he was a kiddy fiddler dropped his airplay down to zero in a matter of weeks. Likewise, you don't hear Lostprophets on rock stations any more, and Last Train Home remains a hell of a good tune, just one sung by a really unpleasant person.

Forcing into the public domain isn't a bad idea as an option, likewise the rewriting of history, but I wouldn't want five options. Which option would you replace, do you think? Option 2 could possibly go, though I do like the "all music has been banned" outcome. Option 4 is probably less direct in addressing the issue, and could also be cut.

Thoughts?
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Fri Jan 04, 2019 2:40 am, edited 3 times in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10541
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Fri Jan 04, 2019 3:16 am

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Fair point, but real life seems to indicate that when someone is exposed for being, for example, a paedophile or rapist that tends to take their work out of circulation pretty rapidly. For example, while nobody has censored Gary Glitter, the revelation that he was a kiddy fiddler dropped his airplay down to zero in a matter of weeks. Likewise, you don't hear Lostprophets on rock stations any more, and Last Train Home remains a hell of a good tune, just one sung by a really unpleasant person.
I guess. I'm really pretty clueless about modern pop music. What's on my mind is a controversy in classical music that's vaguely similar, but not really the same.

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Option 4 is probably less direct in addressing the issue, and could also be cut.
Yeah, option 4 does seem pretty redundant. It's mostly affirming what the nation has already decided (homosexuality bad), and just being draconian about it is covered by option 1.

If you do want something like option 4, it should at least be made more relevant to the narrative, as in "how did we not catch that this guy was homosexual before he died, given those hints in his song lyrics" - which would also tie it into option 2.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads