Advertisement
by Trotterdam » Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:22 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Fri Dec 22, 2023 5:38 am
by TalAkMaChen » Sun Dec 24, 2023 5:33 pm
by Trotterdam » Mon Dec 25, 2023 12:49 am
Huh. That... makes no sense.TalAkMaChen wrote:On war_dogs_cxxix I recently answered issue 1504 with option 2 and got the effect line that is listed as option 1, i.e.
job security isn't great for professional roulette players
while on war_dogs_cdxxxv I got for option 1 the effect line "card players are calling the government's bluff on anti-gambling legislation".
And here I see even less explanation for how that could make sense, given the texts of the options. Option 2 is letting unlimited paid protesting, which would indeed lead to poor people protesting what rich people want them to. Option 3 limits paid protestors enough that there couldn't possibly be "surprising numbers" of them, unless you find low numbers surprising, whereas the effect line about "few people" would make perfect sense there (and if it's wrong, then which option does have few people?).TalAkMaChen wrote:Similar, on war_dogs_ccci it was issue 1408 with option 3 got the listed effect line of option 2, i.e.
surprising numbers of poor people are protesting against taxing the rich
by TalAkMaChen » Mon Dec 25, 2023 7:45 am
by Trotterdam » Mon Dec 25, 2023 11:17 am
While it's common for the editors to completely change an effect line from the one suggested in the draft, I don't recall any case where the editors kept an effect line that is practically identical in wording to one that was submitted, but moved it to a different option. So if the lines are similar enough to the ones in the draft, then it should be a reliable source of information.TalAkMaChen wrote:Agreed, often the association of effects to the option text feels off. I'll go check where the drafts are, usually they give a good hint at what the authors intended - sure enough the mods can still change it in their processes.
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Dec 26, 2023 9:48 am
by TalAkMaChen » Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:20 am
by Trotterdam » Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:23 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:29 am
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:21 am
by Trotterdam » Tue Jan 09, 2024 4:48 am
by TalAkMaChen » Fri Jan 12, 2024 8:32 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Jan 16, 2024 3:42 am
by TalAkMaChen » Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:52 am
by TalAkMaChen » Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:30 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:18 am
by TalAkMaChen » Thu Feb 01, 2024 6:01 am
by Thorn1000 » Thu Feb 01, 2024 7:20 am
TalAkMaChen wrote:1618.1 @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ suffer not the eggplant emoji to live
walrus wrote:Life is a zero-sum game. The lower I make the happiness of children, the higher my happiness rises
by FourCats » Thu Feb 01, 2024 6:16 pm
by Trotterdam » Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:04 pm
Yes. But note that this means you'll get the same issue again as your next issue after you answer that option. Since it's possible (and quite likely, unless you never sleep for longer than six hours) to keep issues in your inbox for a while without answering them, it's possible to get other issues in the meantime.FourCats wrote:To make sure I'm understanding right, issue #1507 Busting to Go option 4 results in continuing to get the same issue?
by TalAkMaChen » Sun Feb 04, 2024 4:53 am
by TalAkMaChen » Wed Feb 07, 2024 2:29 am
by Trotterdam » Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:15 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Fri Feb 09, 2024 6:26 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Nepleslia
Advertisement