Page 1 of 2

[Submitted] A Panhandling Problem

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 2:12 pm
by Divitalia
Blue text indicates changes from the original draft.

[desc]
During one your regular walks through the streets of @@CAPITAL@@, you noticed that the number of panhandlers has sharply risen. Many annoyed passerby see you, and are asking you to do something about it.

[validity] Must have high income inequality, low welfare

[option 1]
A woman storms up to you, furious. “These panhandlers are filthy, horrible people! I just want to go about my day undisturbed, and these people are here on every street corner, begging me for my hard-earned cash. You must make panhandling illegal! Besides, I’ve heard most of these people aren’t really on the streets.
[fallout 1]people are arrested for asking if they can borrow a @@CURRENCY@@

[option 2]
A scraggly old man wearing a torn jacket saunters over to you. “It’s not like I enjoy begging for money; it’s quite embarrassing actually. If I only were to have a place to sleep and food to eat, I wouldn’t have to do this. Please, for us on the streets, pour some more funding into welfare. Those better off than I could use some more taxing anyway.”
[fallout 2]many frugal @@DENONYMPLURAL@@ abuse the nation’s new soup kitchens

[option 3]
A young man wearing green tights dashes over to you, followed by other similarly-dressed men. “My name is Robert Hood, and I think I have a solution to your problem. You see, me and my band of merry men can take some luxuries from the 1%, and give them to those who need it more! Of course, we’ll need to take a small amount of the goods for ourselves as payment.”
[fallout 3]many @@DENONYMPLURAL@@ have been found with stolen art from the @@CAPITAL@@ Museum.
Please give me any feedback you have. Thanks!

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:13 pm
by Fauxia
We might have something similar...

I’m wondering if the “regular walk” thing is a player autonomy sin

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:21 pm
by Trotterdam
Might be worth addressing something about "professional beggars" who deliberately pretend to be poor (by wearing raggy clothing and such) when they're in fact making a pretty good profit.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:56 am
by Divitalia
I’ll try to add that in when I update the draft.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:35 am
by Candlewhisper Archive
In terms of something similar, I drafted on this topic a while ago:

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=372080

However, its one of my least favourite drafts so I'm unlikely to self-publish it. Help yourself to anything you want from it.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:47 am
by Divitalia
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:In terms of something similar, I drafted on this topic a while ago:

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=372080

However, its one of my least favourite drafts so I'm unlikely to self-publish it. Help yourself to anything you want from it.


Thanks!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 6:25 pm
by Divitalia
*bump*

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:00 pm
by Divitalia
I’d really like to get another bit of feedback or 2 before I make the next draft.

*bump*

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:28 pm
by Fauxia
Spice up fallout 3

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 12:51 pm
by Divitalia
Fauxia wrote:Spice up fallout 3


Updated.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:49 am
by The 19th Century
#251 is a similar topic. Keep that in mind and make sure your issue is distinct from it.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:52 am
by Vulturret
The 19th Century wrote:#251 is a similar topic. Keep that in mind and make sure your issue is distinct from it.

Agreed. Several things about begging people on the streets have been introduced as well lately. Try and find the most interesting and distinct thing possible.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:39 pm
by Divitalia
The 19th Century wrote:#251 is a similar topic. Keep that in mind and make sure your issue is distinct from it.


Thanks for the number. I’ll look it over and make some changes so this draft is different from it.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:23 am
by Australian rePublic
Hello, not a bad little issue you got here. Now let's take a look:

Isn't option 3 a little too on-the-nose?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:12 am
by Divitalia
Australian rePublic wrote:Hello, not a bad little issue you got here. Now let's take a look:

Isn't option 3 a little too on-the-nose?


What do you mean?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:17 am
by USS Monitor
I don't mind option 3. It's obviously a silly option, but you're not having a problem with the issue being too long, so there's room for a silly option.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:55 am
by Divitalia
*bump*

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:32 pm
by Fauxia
"Are asking you to do something about it" is very bland. Make it more funny, or else just cut it out.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:09 pm
by Divitalia
Fauxia wrote:"Are asking you to do something about it" is very bland. Make it more funny, or else just cut it out.


What if I put “are begging you to do something about it” as a pun?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:34 pm
by Divitalia
*sighs*

/bump

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 4:09 pm
by Jutsa
This one will be next on my list of things to tackle after I do Dolor Mortis's. :P

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:56 am
by Jutsa
Well, uh, actually, the only thing I have to say is this:
The first word in an effect line should not be capitalized. It automatically is if you answer issues, but it isn't on a nation's homepage or activity feed.

I actually have no other qualms with this draft! It's simplistic, yes, but it really feels like it has an old-issue charm that I can't help but enjoy. :)

Some people might want a few things punched up, but I like it as-is.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 12:14 pm
by Divitalia
Jutsa wrote:Well, uh, actually, the only thing I have to say is this:
The first word in an effect line should not be capitalized. It automatically is if you answer issues, but it isn't on a nation's homepage or activity feed.

I actually have no other qualms with this draft! It's simplistic, yes, but it really feels like it has an old-issue charm that I can't help but enjoy. :)

Some people might want a few things punched up, but I like it as-is.


Wow, thanks! That means a lot coming from someone who has seen so many different issues.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:50 pm
by Divitalia
Added low welfare into the validity.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 5:05 pm
by Jutsa
Wow, thanks! That means a lot coming from someone who has seen so many different issues.
Eheh, thanks, but don't get your hopes too high yet. Never know when someone might have an opposing opinion. :P