NATION

PASSWORD

Issue outcome makes no sense

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Virea
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Dec 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Issue outcome makes no sense

Postby Virea » Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:39 am

To my opinion at least, some issues outcomes make no sense. Just now for example, I had an issue with the enviroment, and I let the farmers use whatever chemicals they want to grow their plants. And my agriculture dropped by 40%. Is that intended and if so can someone explain why? (issue 599)
Last edited by Virea on Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13716
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:44 am

Virea wrote:To my opinion at least, some issues outcomes make no sense. Just now for example, I had an issue with the enviroment, and I let the farmers use whatever chemicals they want to grow their plants. And my agriculture dropped by 40%. Is that intended and if so can someone explain why? (issue 599)

Option 4 (the one beginning "With a wrench and some salty language..."), I believe?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading One Summer: America 1927 by Bill Bryson

User avatar
Vando0sa
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 368
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Vando0sa » Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:55 am

Chemicals destroy the environment.. and thus agriculture.. balance of nature is delicate.
Kevät itkee talven töitä Käy hyinen tuulen henki Kevät itkee talven töitä Virta kantaa luita rantaan

User avatar
Bluelight-R006
Senator
 
Posts: 4317
Founded: Mar 31, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bluelight-R006 » Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:02 am

Vando0sa wrote:Chemicals destroy the environment.. and thus agriculture.. balance of nature is delicate.

I agree. The issue actually makes sense because plants and sort could die with the overusage of chemicals. So as the bunch rest.

User avatar
Diyaristan
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Apr 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Diyaristan » Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:07 am

Vando0sa wrote:Chemicals destroy the environment.. and thus agriculture.. balance of nature is delicate.

Not true. Technically, everything you touch or eat is a chemical - it is constructed of molecules. Chemicals are found in nature. Chemistry is the science of making use of these chemicals derived from nature and they are a product of man's mind, without which civilization, and the computer you are enjoying right now, would not exist. Applied to agriculture, they have made crop cultivation possible in nutrition-deprived waste environments.

A few other issues have outcomes that make no sense due to the math behind the engine, which varies by government type. Example: supporting that aristocrat on the famine issue with no relief for the poor increasing income equality.
Last edited by Diyaristan on Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
(Sevevillian-Occupied) Republic of Diyaristan - جمهيريأ دياراسطانا
Formerly an independent but flawed democracy; now under a foreign flag and occupation forces

The most conscientious leftists are shooting themselves in the foot with their ethic of sacrificing their own best to people who might not be trustworthy. The worse of them, when they fall behind in the race, decide they want to shoot others in the foot to make the race fair. Nature stubbornly refuses to be egalitarian. Not everyone can run at the same pace, or think at the same pace, and equality necessarily implies hobbling progress with worse speed for all but the slowest.

User avatar
Bluelight-R006
Senator
 
Posts: 4317
Founded: Mar 31, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bluelight-R006 » Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:21 am

Diyaristan wrote:
Vando0sa wrote:Chemicals destroy the environment.. and thus agriculture.. balance of nature is delicate.

Not true. Technically, everything you touch or eat is a chemical - it is constructed of molecules. Chemicals are found in nature. Chemistry is the science of making use of these chemicals derived from nature and they are a product of man's mind, without which civilization, and the computer you are enjoying right now, would not exist. Applied to agriculture, they have made crop cultivation possible in nutrition-deprived waste environments.

A few other issues have outcomes that make no sense due to the math behind the engine, which varies by government type. Example: supporting that aristocrat on the famine issue with no relief for the poor increasing income equality.

In my opinion, common chemicals, like used in food, which are always allowed, are non-harmful but some chemicals for other things can be poisonous.

Just a guess.

User avatar
Vando0sa
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 368
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Vando0sa » Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:29 am

Maybe the chemicals are messing with insects..

I've learned a lesson recently. We had a serious ant problem so I used chemicals to kill the ants. Finally I won and the ants are no more in our house. Now we have roaches.. turns out the roaches are ants natural food.. and with the ants gone the roaches took over..
Kevät itkee talven töitä Käy hyinen tuulen henki Kevät itkee talven töitä Virta kantaa luita rantaan

User avatar
Diyaristan
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Apr 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Diyaristan » Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:53 am

To Bluelight: Some chemicals are engineered to cause devastation (chemical weapons for example), it is true. Others have unforeseen side effects, true, but by and large most atomic arrangements are not poisonous. If research stopped, it would kill many more people - think how the population exploded in the past two centuries with the advent of modern science and the Industrial Revolution. So many less people were dying.

To Vandoosa: Thanks for bringing that up about the bugs; I hope what I say will help: I had a problem with bug invasions in my home one time, one after another. First ants (fire ants, as I live in the South), then roaches. The first two problems were tackled by using a combination of poisons and sealed food storage for what we could - whole nests of both creatures were killed off, the incentive (easy food) was removed, and what poison was there kept the populations from getting established again if they came.

In raw nature, it is a warzone. Animals kill each other for territory, or food. Defending yours vigorously, and ruthlessly driving them out, is better for your quality of life than an infestation of anything going unchallenged.
Last edited by Diyaristan on Sun Jan 07, 2018 4:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
(Sevevillian-Occupied) Republic of Diyaristan - جمهيريأ دياراسطانا
Formerly an independent but flawed democracy; now under a foreign flag and occupation forces

The most conscientious leftists are shooting themselves in the foot with their ethic of sacrificing their own best to people who might not be trustworthy. The worse of them, when they fall behind in the race, decide they want to shoot others in the foot to make the race fair. Nature stubbornly refuses to be egalitarian. Not everyone can run at the same pace, or think at the same pace, and equality necessarily implies hobbling progress with worse speed for all but the slowest.

User avatar
Vando0sa
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 368
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Vando0sa » Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:08 am

The biggest problem with using chemicals to rid your area of land of unwanted pests is it still ends up in run off water. It will cause problems in the eco system eventually.. I suspect the large amount of plants in my garden dying off might also have been linked to me chemical nuking everything to kill ants..


We can't stop using pesticides or all our crops will be wiped out naturally.. what a conflict..
Kevät itkee talven töitä Käy hyinen tuulen henki Kevät itkee talven töitä Virta kantaa luita rantaan

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21482
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:14 am

Vando0sa wrote:The biggest problem with using chemicals to rid your area of land of unwanted pests is it still ends up in run off water. It will cause problems in the eco system eventually.. I suspect the large amount of plants in my garden dying off might also have been linked to me chemical nuking everything to kill ants..


We can't stop using pesticides or all our crops will be wiped out naturally.. what a conflict..

"So take a glance, at those tasty ants,
And maybe try a few...
The bear necessities of life will come to you!"
.
[/Baloo]
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Diyaristan
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Apr 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Diyaristan » Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:33 am

Vando0sa wrote:The biggest problem with using chemicals to rid your area of land of unwanted pests is it still ends up in run off water. It will cause problems in the eco system eventually.. I suspect the large amount of plants in my garden dying off might also have been linked to me chemical nuking everything to kill ants..


We can't stop using pesticides or all our crops will be wiped out naturally.. what a conflict..

Usually, when problems do happen, people recognize it and move to reverse the damage. For instance, you're making an analysis of the costs and benefits of getting rid of roaches versus the security of your water supply down the line. You're trying to discover better methods, since you in person know the situation best.

To complicate this issue on a global scale, diseases from food. In countries where pesticides and manufactured fertilizers are not used/not available, there is a very high incidence of parasitic infection transmission through vegetables due to the use of raw-nature substances that attract worms and harmful bacteria, like manure. That's not good for a man's living environment at all. Many have died for lack of clean water by that means too; a common problem especially in Africa.
(Sevevillian-Occupied) Republic of Diyaristan - جمهيريأ دياراسطانا
Formerly an independent but flawed democracy; now under a foreign flag and occupation forces

The most conscientious leftists are shooting themselves in the foot with their ethic of sacrificing their own best to people who might not be trustworthy. The worse of them, when they fall behind in the race, decide they want to shoot others in the foot to make the race fair. Nature stubbornly refuses to be egalitarian. Not everyone can run at the same pace, or think at the same pace, and equality necessarily implies hobbling progress with worse speed for all but the slowest.

User avatar
Vando0sa
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 368
Founded: Mar 08, 2014
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Vando0sa » Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:35 am

Bears Armed wrote:
Vando0sa wrote:The biggest problem with using chemicals to rid your area of land of unwanted pests is it still ends up in run off water. It will cause problems in the eco system eventually.. I suspect the large amount of plants in my garden dying off might also have been linked to me chemical nuking everything to kill ants..


We can't stop using pesticides or all our crops will be wiped out naturally.. what a conflict..

"So take a glance, at those tasty ants,
And maybe try a few...
The bear necessities of life will come to you!"
.
[/Baloo]



Eating ants might seem like a good idea but not so much in the Southern US.. those ants bite back.. With fire and fury..

EEP! i'm getting a bit off topic.. *runs away*
Kevät itkee talven töitä Käy hyinen tuulen henki Kevät itkee talven töitä Virta kantaa luita rantaan

User avatar
Diyaristan
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Apr 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Diyaristan » Sun Jan 07, 2018 5:44 am

Vando0sa wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:"So take a glance, at those tasty ants,
And maybe try a few...
The bear necessities of life will come to you!"
.
[/Baloo]



Eating ants might seem like a good idea but not so much in the Southern US.. those ants bite back.. With fire and fury..

EEP! i'm getting a bit off topic.. *runs away*

Oof, owch, owie, my tongue. Get it off, get it off!
(Sevevillian-Occupied) Republic of Diyaristan - جمهيريأ دياراسطانا
Formerly an independent but flawed democracy; now under a foreign flag and occupation forces

The most conscientious leftists are shooting themselves in the foot with their ethic of sacrificing their own best to people who might not be trustworthy. The worse of them, when they fall behind in the race, decide they want to shoot others in the foot to make the race fair. Nature stubbornly refuses to be egalitarian. Not everyone can run at the same pace, or think at the same pace, and equality necessarily implies hobbling progress with worse speed for all but the slowest.

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sun Jan 07, 2018 8:56 am

OP there is a megathread for these inquires:

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=424650

Often I find the problem to be not so careful reading of th option. Here’s what you picked:

With a wrench and some salty language, the captain lands the ‘fish,’ a woman in a scuba suit. Floundering on deck, she fumes, “Aggh! I can’t see anything down there, with all that gunk from the estuary! Rumor has it there’s shipwrecks down there, but I’ve never seen one. Look, the problem here is chemical fertilizer run off from farms, so why not fix the problem back at the farms with better chemicals? Oblige the farmers to add chlorine bleach to the water supply in proportion to the fertilizers they use, and your rivers and seas will boast crystal clear water!”


So bleach (added to make the water clear) isn’t really the greatest for crop growth.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft
Minister
 
Posts: 3373
Founded: Jul 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Sun Jan 07, 2018 8:58 am

How does expanding my space program increase religiousness? Or my IT industry get negatively affected because of a war on the other side of the world?

User avatar
Leutria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1724
Founded: Oct 29, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leutria » Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:09 am

Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:How does expanding my space program increase religiousness? Or my IT industry get negatively affected because of a war on the other side of the world?

Secondary effects. Also, use the megathread if you have an issue with a specific issue.

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sun Jan 07, 2018 9:25 am

Leutria is correct. If this turns into a generic unusual issue effects thread I’ll lock it. Use the megathread.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Snurdly
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Mar 20, 2015
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Snurdly » Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:45 am

I just got an issue about a national day. There was a patriotic option, a military option, a nudism option, and a no-holiday option. Consistent with my leadership style, I selected the nudism option. It had some confusing impacts, but apparently no impact on my nudity ranking, which remains at an embarrassing 5% in the world, 6% in the region. If I can somehow get to the top 0.7% in foreign aid, and the top 1% in welfare, why can't I get my people naked?

Hiram Tweedle
President Snurdly

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sun Jan 07, 2018 11:37 am

People are already as free to get naked as they want in Snurdly. Either make nudism mandatory or focus on secondary effects related to nudism.

As promised this thread is now locked. Use the megathead people.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads