Page 1 of 1

[DRAFT] To Serve Children

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 4:56 pm
by Coriltan
In response to a slow news week, angry parents, crying toddlers, and irate chefs have been petitioning for a change in children's food.

1."My parents only give me vegetables!" whines hungry 5-year-old @randomname@. "Make parents give children only food approved by a panel of children. Children's food rights now!"

Result: Obese children waddle around, waiting for their government-approved meals of pizza and fries.

2." What about all the poor babies forced to eat tasteless mush?" says @randomname@, a flavor rights crusader. "Baby food is supposed to be good for babies! It's withering the pallets of these young children. Make the food you give to children worthy of a five-star restaurant!"

Result: Truffles are served from birth.

3."Why don't we just let parents decide? It's the easiest thing to do anyway." states apathetic citizen @randomname@ " So what if some little brats starve and some parents lavish precious resources on their children? Not my problem."

Result: Starving children are forced to eat their parents.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:05 pm
by Ransium
All I could think of when I saw the title was:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SxI7B758XBQ

(Which, yes, I realize is itself a parody of a Twighlight Zone episode.)

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 5:25 pm
by Fauxia
Do some people think this is kinda overlapping? I don’t, but I’m not an expert on the matter

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 11:30 pm
by Australian rePublic
Hello, not a bad little issue you got here

But option 3 is the same as the dismiss button

PostPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 11:34 pm
by Principality of the Raix
Australian Republic wrote:Hello, not a bad little issue you got here

But option 3 is the same as the dismiss button


Not truly, it could rise civil rights. Pushing government out of the house hold per se. However, there are many food issues already, so this should be given deeper thought in the end...

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:09 am
by Fauxia
Principality of the Raix wrote:
Australian Republic wrote:Hello, not a bad little issue you got here

But option 3 is the same as the dismiss button


Not truly, it could rise civil rights. Pushing government out of the house hold per se. However, there are many food issues already, so this should be given deeper thought in the end...

It also could lower civil rights

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:09 am
by Principality of the Raix
Fauxia wrote:It also could lower civil rights



It depends, really. Reason I stated, it needs more deeper speculation and thought.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:11 am
by Kinky Bastards
Isn't there one quite similar to this already? Weather kids should eat healthy or candy and pastries, I think?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 11:13 am
by Principality of the Raix
Kinky Bastards wrote:Isn't there one quite similar to this already? Weather kids should eat healthy or candy and pastries, I think?


Reason I stated the above, also yes there is.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 3:40 am
by Candlewhisper Archive
Fauxia wrote:Do some people think this is kinda overlapping? I don’t, but I’m not an expert on the matter


Yes, strong overlaps. This draft isn't worth proceeding with, I would say.