NATION

PASSWORD

[MEGATHREAD] Unusual Issue Effects

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sat Oct 28, 2017 1:14 pm

Appalachia wrote:So on Issue #845, "A Comedy Of Errors," I chose Option 2, which states "Comedy is a form of art, not a nuisance to the credibility of politicians and leaders. The government should not have a say on how we tell our jokes."

Yet for some reason this reduced my Political Freedom? I feel as though this is a mistake, unless there's some reasoning I'm not understanding.


Mirchusko wrote:Nation: Mirchusko
Issue: "Criminals to Vote?" number 320
Date: 28 October 2017
Choice: Option 2 (allow prisoners to vote)

Confusing outcomes: minor decrease in Civil Rights (82.3 to 81.3) and Political Freedom (82.5 to 81.3). Authoritarianism went from .03 to .04, which is a little weird but probably due to the decrease in the others? I'm just a bit annoyed because I'm trying hard to max out freedoms without trashing my economy and this issue seemed like an easy pick.


Okay, the same thing is happening with both of these. The way political freedoms are calculated got adjusted slightly, this adjustment is being expressed in your next issue choice. In both cases, the choice didn't make your political freedoms change, the model adjustment did. In fact, for Michusko the choice without the model adjustment would have indeed increased political freedoms.

Also to Michusko your civil rights weren't actually affected by that choice.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Teh War Machine
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Dec 17, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Teh War Machine » Sat Oct 28, 2017 1:18 pm

Teh War Machine wrote:Option 3 of 194 doesn't affect defense forces and increases political freedom?


Apparently I was skipped.
One of the many puppets of the glorious nation of Koem Kab

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sat Oct 28, 2017 1:27 pm

Teh War Machine wrote:
Teh War Machine wrote:Option 3 of 194 doesn't affect defense forces and increases political freedom?


Apparently I was skipped.


Same answer, I think, model recalibration. It would normally have increased defense force and decreased political freedoms.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Awesome country of jj
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 6
Founded: Apr 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Awesome country of jj » Sun Oct 29, 2017 8:13 am

Issue 552 Option 3. Why would it decrease my scientific advancement?

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sun Oct 29, 2017 9:04 am

Awesome country of jj wrote:Issue 552 Option 3. Why would it decrease my scientific advancement?


The answer with scientific advancement is always secondary effects. In this this case the choice doesn't suggest the most intelligent populace perhaps.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Ustrzyki Dolne
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jul 31, 2017
Conservative Democracy

Postby Ustrzyki Dolne » Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:11 pm

- The name of the nation that had this effect Ustrzyki Dolne
- The day that this effect was encountered 30/10/2017
- The name of the issue, and if you know it, the number of the issue. I got issue #008 "Nudists Demand Time In Sun" and chose the option to make nudity compulsory.

My Social Conservatism went up and I got reclassified from an Inoffensive Centrist Democracy to a Moralistic Democracy. This seems counterintuitive... :unsure:
Last edited by Ustrzyki Dolne on Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10541
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:26 pm

Ustrzyki Dolne wrote:My Social Conservatism went up and I got reclassified from an Inoffensive Centrist Democracy to a Moralistic Democracy. This seems counterintuitive... :unsure:
Your nation now considers clothing immoral, and so is more moralistic.

User avatar
[violet]
Executive Director
 
Posts: 16205
Founded: Antiquity

Postby [violet] » Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:30 pm

Reorganisieren Reichregierung wrote:
[violet] wrote:It can; I'll raise it with Editors.

Thanks a lot!

P.S: Will my stats be fixed as well?

It would be a model change, so yes, if we start recognizing feudalism's impact on income inequality, it would automatically correct all nations.

That's different to when an issue option is recoded, which only affects nations selecting that option in the future.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:51 am

Cheers for taking this on, violet.

May not be apparent front-of-house, but right now violet is a dynamo of insane levels of activity and working closely with the backstage issues team, so expect lots of long awaited game engine fixes to be happening in the not distant future.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4777
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The North Polish Union » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:05 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Ustrzyki Dolne wrote:My Social Conservatism went up and I got reclassified from an Inoffensive Centrist Democracy to a Moralistic Democracy. This seems counterintuitive... :unsure:
Your nation now considers clothing immoral, and so is more moralistic.

FWIW, Ustrzyki Dolne is my puppet.

How does this work? If nothing is immoral how can my nation be more moralistic?

Also why does Social Conservatism increase? The fact that the game determines this for all nations means that there must be some "objective" in-game standard for Social Conservatism and I've never heard of anyone who defines compulsory nudity as socially conservative. Usually it's the opposite.
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
Luna Amore
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 15751
Founded: Antiquity
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Luna Amore » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:11 pm

The North Polish Union wrote:
Trotterdam wrote:Your nation now considers clothing immoral, and so is more moralistic.

FWIW, Ustrzyki Dolne is my puppet.

How does this work? If nothing is immoral how can my nation be more moralistic?

Also why does Social Conservatism increase? The fact that the game determines this for all nations means that there must be some "objective" in-game standard for Social Conservatism and I've never heard of anyone who defines compulsory nudity as socially conservative. Usually it's the opposite.

You are forcing people to do something -> restricts civil rights -> raises social conservatism.

User avatar
Reorganisieren Reichregierung
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 465
Founded: Jan 23, 2017
Corporate Police State

Postby Reorganisieren Reichregierung » Mon Oct 30, 2017 1:18 pm

[violet] wrote:
Reorganisieren Reichregierung wrote:Thanks a lot!

P.S: Will my stats be fixed as well?

It would be a model change, so yes, if we start recognizing feudalism's impact on income inequality, it would automatically correct all nations.

That's different to when an issue option is recoded, which only affects nations selecting that option in the future.

Thanks, Violet, for all the work you do for us NationStaters!
GROSSGERMANISCHES REICH DEUTSCHEN NATION
Canons: Kali Yuga | TSC
Overview | Government | Military | Economy

Generic Reich LARP nation #557753245. Call me "Reich", "RR" or by nation name only if OOC.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10541
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:43 pm

Trotterdam wrote:Your nation now considers clothing immoral, and so is more moralistic.
The North Polish Union wrote:How does this work? If nothing is immoral how can my nation be more moralistic?
What does that have to do with what I said?

The North Polish Union wrote:I've never heard of anyone who defines compulsory nudity as socially conservative. Usually it's the opposite.
Compulsory nudity isn't exactly something supported by liberals, either.

Are you aware what the word "compulsory" means?
Last edited by Trotterdam on Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jutsa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5513
Founded: Dec 06, 2015
Capitalizt

Postby Jutsa » Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:54 pm

I think you meant to put NPU in the last quote tag, Trotterdam... :lol:
You're welcome to telegram me any questions you have of the game. Unless I've CTE'd (ceased to exist) - then you physically can't do that.

Helpful* Got Issues? Links (Not Pinned In Forum) *mostly: >List of Issue-Related Lists | >Personal List of Issue Ideas | >List of Known Missing Issues/Options |
>Trotterdam's Issue Results/Policies Tracker | >Val's Bonus Stats | >Fauzjhia's Easter Egg Guide | >My Joke Drafts List | >Sherp's Author Rankings

Other Nifty Links: >Best-Ranked Useful Dispatches | >NSindex | >IA's WA Proposal Office | >Major Discord Links | >Trivia | >Cards Against NS | >Polls

"Remember, licking doorknobs is perfectly legal on other planets." - Ja Luıñaí

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4777
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The North Polish Union » Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:32 pm

Luna Amore wrote:
The North Polish Union wrote:FWIW, Ustrzyki Dolne is my puppet.

How does this work? If nothing is immoral how can my nation be more moralistic?

Also why does Social Conservatism increase? The fact that the game determines this for all nations means that there must be some "objective" in-game standard for Social Conservatism and I've never heard of anyone who defines compulsory nudity as socially conservative. Usually it's the opposite.

You are forcing people to do something -> restricts civil rights -> raises social conservatism.

Ah, I see. That makes a bit more sense
Trotterdam wrote:
Trotterdam wrote:Your nation now considers clothing immoral, and so is more moralistic.
The North Polish Union wrote:How does this work? If nothing is immoral how can my nation be more moralistic?
What does that have to do with what I said?

Sorry, I misread "clothing" as "nothing." My bad. :blush:
The North Polish Union wrote:I've never heard of anyone who defines compulsory nudity as socially conservative. Usually it's the opposite.
Compulsory nudity isn't exactly something supported by liberals, either.

Are you aware what the word "compulsory" means?[/quote]
TBH I doubt either side of the aisle supports compulsory nudity. I think my confusion about your first post was what threw me off. I see what you're saying now.
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10541
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Wed Nov 01, 2017 7:25 pm

Alright, glad that's cleared up.

User avatar
Abyrvalg
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Mar 30, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Abyrvalg » Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:00 pm

Today I banned strong liquors and got decrease of Intelligence
Quips Per Hour 92.13 → 92.08 0.05%
(Last Call For Alcohol? #2)
Less alcoholism could only increase Intelligence.
Last edited by Abyrvalg on Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Twilva Thir
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Oct 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Twilva Thir » Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:06 pm

On the issue "Women In Uniform Under Fire", I allowed everyone that could shoot and were of excellent physical build to join. Nothing, and I do mean nothing, went up or down.

Except for inclusiveness, which went up 1.6%, and that was the only stat that changed.

User avatar
Greater Istanistan
Senator
 
Posts: 4978
Founded: May 15, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Greater Istanistan » Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:36 pm

So on issue 75, I picked option 3, which was to take felons and make them work off their sentences. As far as options go, that isn't that uncommon, and even for a garbo socialist country this is basically just gulags I guess. It dropped my poor income, which I'd been working on, by 40%. Apart from that, the issue's effects weren't really that wild. Is this normal? Sorry!
ASK ME ABOUT HARUHIISM

DYNASTIES ARE THEFT/IMPEACH REINHARD/YANG WENLI 2020

"I am not a champion of lost causes, but of causes not yet won." - Norman Thomas

User avatar
[violet]
Executive Director
 
Posts: 16205
Founded: Antiquity

Postby [violet] » Wed Nov 01, 2017 10:53 pm

Greater Istanistan wrote:So on issue 75, I picked option 3, which was to take felons and make them work off their sentences. As far as options go, that isn't that uncommon, and even for a garbo socialist country this is basically just gulags I guess. It dropped my poor income, which I'd been working on, by 40%. Apart from that, the issue's effects weren't really that wild. Is this normal? Sorry!

Average income of the poor usually drops a lot when you institute slavery because you have people working for nothing. This was particularly the case in your nation, because previously wages were very equal between rich and poor.

User avatar
Abyrvalg
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Mar 30, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Abyrvalg » Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:05 pm

In "Ornery Overcrowding Problem" I just have chose to build high buildings to save more land for the nature; but Eco-Friendliness & Environmental Beauty decreased.

Eco-Friendliness
Dolphin Recycling Awareness Index 9,852.18 → 9,831.45 0.21%

Environmental Beauty
Pounds Of Wildlife Per Square Mile 2,010.62 → 1,990.74 0.99%

User avatar
Abyrvalg
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Mar 30, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Abyrvalg » Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:12 pm

In "Sky High" I legalized drugs - and that increased Intelligence?!

Recreational Drug Use
Pineapple Fondness Rating 63.00 → 96.40 53.0%

Intelligence
Quips Per Hour 92.21 → 92.47 0.28%

*murmuring* I am a hippie myself, bro, but isn't something wrong with your ideology, dude?..

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sat Nov 04, 2017 8:25 am

Abyrvalg wrote:In "Ornery Overcrowding Problem" I just have chose to build high buildings to save more land for the nature; but Eco-Friendliness & Environmental Beauty decreased.

Eco-Friendliness
Dolphin Recycling Awareness Index 9,852.18 → 9,831.45 0.21%

Environmental Beauty
Pounds Of Wildlife Per Square Mile 2,010.62 → 1,990.74 0.99%


There's no need to post the changes, we can easily look them up if it's an issue you recently answered. Anyway, this is working as intended, as per CWA's recent changes to the issue. I haven't been involved in the stat changes of late so I shouldn't get much of a vote, but it does seem a bit harsh for something that's not that well telegraphed. I'm sure CWA will see this in the next few days and he can decide whether he wants to change it or not.

Abyrvalg wrote:In "Sky High" I legalized drugs - and that increased Intelligence?!

Recreational Drug Use
Pineapple Fondness Rating 63.00 → 96.40 53.0%

Intelligence
Quips Per Hour 92.21 → 92.47 0.28%

*murmuring* I am a hippie myself, bro, but isn't something wrong with your ideology, dude?..


Note that it's a change of .26 quips per hour, which considering the max in the world is 642, is not a lot. Generally, with minor changes like this the answer is always going to be the same, secondary effects of the model. In this case generally, when you increase civil rights your population's intelligence will increase a bit.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Aclion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6249
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aclion » Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:14 pm

i just answered #243: A Question Of Faith; taking the option to decline to name an official faith and my inclusiveness went up almost 30 points.
It makes perfect sense that it would go up for nations that enforce religious policies; but it seems like a big change for a nation like mine, which has always taken a hands off approach with religion.
Last edited by Aclion on Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. - James Madison.

User avatar
Fauxia
Senator
 
Posts: 4827
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Fauxia » Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:26 pm

Aclion wrote:i just answered #243: A Question Of Faith; taking the option to decline to name an official faith and my inclusiveness went up almost 30 points.
It makes perfect sense that it would go up for nations that enforce religious policies; but it seems like a big change for a nation like mine, which has always taken a hands off approach with religion.
Your inclusiveness is quite low, so it was even lower before. The game tries to normalize most stats, and will take any excuse to do so. That’s how I understand it, anyway.
Reploid Productions wrote:Unfortunately, Max still won't buy the mods elite ninja assassin squads to use, so... no such luck.
Sandaoguo wrote:GP is a den of cynics and nihilists
My opinions do not represent any NS governments I may happen to be in (yeah right), any RL governments I may happen to be in (yeah right), the CIA, the NSA, the FBI. the Freemasons, the Illuminati, Opus Dei, the Knights Templar, the Organization for the Advancement of Cultural Marxism, Opus Dei, or any other organization. Unless I say they do, in which case, there is a nonzero chance.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads