Candlewhisper Archive wrote:The United Chads wrote:Issue 195.1 significantly increased the averageness and decreased the ideological radicality of my nation, even though it eroded individual property rights that would generally be considered the norm. The reason why I selected it was to reaffirm the public ownership of all property that should exist in any pure socialist state like mine, a stance that would generally be considered ideologically radical. Was there some factor in this situation that I did not consider? If so, I would like to know what it was. Thank you.
Ideological Radicality is a secondary stat that looks at a whole bunch of numbers to say how average your nations approaches are on several metrics. It could move either way with this issue, depending on your starting position.
So in other words, since there were already no privacy rights or property rights in my country, and there were also almost no civil rights in my country, answering this issue in this way had a larger proportional effect on increasing my civil rights than it did on decreasing my privacy/property rights. This had the overall effect of reducing ideological radicality. Is that a good assessment?