NationStates

Fauxia wrote:

Trotterdam wrote:See that menu bar at the top? Click "View". Click "Page Source". The exact words may differ by browser, but it should be something along those lines.

At least on mine, Control+U is a shortcut.

Right now, I'm on mobile, and I am a good deal, so I don't see the menu bar.

Yeah, I don't know if any mobile browsers allow you to view the page source. You'd have to get to a desktop or laptop for that.

Phydios wrote:

Fauxia wrote:Right now, I'm on mobile, and I am a good deal, so I don't see the menu bar.

Yeah, I don't know if any mobile browsers allow you to view the page source. You'd have to get to a desktop or laptop for that.

Ther are apparently ways of doing it involving bookmarklets, but again, I'm inept.

Oh right, mobile.

I tried to look for a way to view the source on a borrowed one once and couldn't figure it out.

You're doomed.

Well, I can now confirm that option 793.3 leads to #797. Also, I can confirm that #797 has at least eight options, though I doubt they all show at any given time: my first option had an ID of 0, and my last had an ID of 7. I posted the issue in the megathread.

Phydios wrote:Well, I can now confirm that option 793.3 leads to #797. Also, I can confirm that #797 has at least eight options, though I doubt they all show at any given time: my first option had an ID of 0, and my last had an ID of 7. I posted the issue in the megathread.

My puppet did not get an new issue from the chain, so I can confirm 797 is the last one.

Fauxia wrote:

Phydios wrote:Well, I can now confirm that option 793.3 leads to #797. Also, I can confirm that #797 has at least eight options, though I doubt they all show at any given time: my first option had an ID of 0, and my last had an ID of 7. I posted the issue in the megathread.

My puppet did not get an new issue from the chain, so I can confirm 797 is the last one.

Thanks. I got the same result on this nation this morning. Now I just have to hope that my puppets get the chain.

Phydios wrote:

Fauxia wrote:My puppet did not get an new issue from the chain, so I can confirm 797 is the last one.

Thanks. I got the same result on this nation this morning. Now I just have to hope that my puppets get the chain.

Judging from your text, 790.1 leads to 793; that's the one I took with Garjohnia

To help this, I'm going to fill my puppet storage with a bunch of Issue puppets. I'll make sure to make them democracies, don't worry.

Fauxia wrote:To help this, I'm going to fill my puppet storage with a bunch of Issue puppets. I'll make sure to make them democracies, don't worry.

Sounds great!

I chose option 4 of issue 793. I'll let you know where that takes me.

Jutsa wrote:I chose option 4 of issue 793. I'll let you know where that takes me.

Probably 797.

Yep.

Also, go integrity! Every last option I chose boosted it; got to the top 1% because of it, even after a minor dip.

Jutsa wrote:Also, go integrity! Every last option I chose boosted it; got to the top 1% because of it, even after a minor dip.

Hah nice.

Also, congrats on your 300th post

Jutsa wrote:Yep.

Thanks. Updated.

Well, I just caught what's likely a 36th effect line, that apparently has to be very unpopular for me to have not seen it until now.

Meanwhile, although my notes still suggest an 8-issue chain, I rather suspect that I may have made a mistake somewhere. If I redact just one small jot in my notes, I can split one of the larger issues into two separate issues, which would better fit the apparent numbering scheme. I thought I was being pretty meticulous in checking the data I'm writing down, but I didn't actually write down which nation I cited that detail on, so I can't go back to double-check now.

Trotterdam wrote:Well, I just caught what's likely a 36th effect line, that apparently has to be very unpopular for me to have not seen it until now.

Meanwhile, although my notes still suggest an 8-issue chain, I rather suspect that I may have made a mistake somewhere. If I redact just one small jot in my notes, I can split one of the larger issues into two separate issues, which would better fit the apparent numbering scheme. I thought I was being pretty meticulous in checking the data I'm writing down, but I didn't actually write down which nation I cited that detail on, so I can't go back to double-check now.

9 Issues. 789-797. Unless 796 is unrelated.

Fauxia wrote:

Trotterdam wrote:Well, I just caught what's likely a 36th effect line, that apparently has to be very unpopular for me to have not seen it until now.

Meanwhile, although my notes still suggest an 8-issue chain, I rather suspect that I may have made a mistake somewhere. If I redact just one small jot in my notes, I can split one of the larger issues into two separate issues, which would better fit the apparent numbering scheme. I thought I was being pretty meticulous in checking the data I'm writing down, but I didn't actually write down which nation I cited that detail on, so I can't go back to double-check now.

9 Issues. 789-797. Unless 796 is unrelated.

Have you seen #791, #794, and #795?

Phydios wrote:

Fauxia wrote:9 Issues. 789-797. Unless 796 is unrelated.

Have you seen #791, #794, and #795?

No, but I would be willing to bet money that 789.2 leads to 791. And it would solve Trott's confusion.

Fauxia wrote:9 Issues. 789-797. Unless 796 is unrelated.

Yes, the numbering scheme is part of why I'm second-guessing myself.

Fauxia wrote:No, but I would be willing to bet money that 789.2 leads to 791.

No bet.

The problem is that I've recorded one of #791's options as including a possible followup that I am now suspecting was incorrect, and cannot actually be received from that option on #791 (though it definitely can from a different option).

Trotterdam wrote:

Fauxia wrote:9 Issues. 789-797. Unless 796 is unrelated.

Yes, the numbering scheme is part of why I'm second-guessing myself.

Fauxia wrote:No, but I would be willing to bet money that 789.2 leads to 791.

No bet.

The problem is that I've recorded one of #791's options as including a possible followup that I am now suspecting was incorrect, and cannot actually be received from that option on #791 (though it definitely can from a different option).

Well listen, no one's mad at you because no one does this like you.

Fauxia wrote:Well listen, no one's mad at you because no one does this like you.

I'm mad at myself! I thought I was being meticulous in only writing down what I'd directly observed, but somehow I've managed to just fabricate something from thin air, and I didn't even record which nation I was looking at at the time so I can't have a second look. That's just embarrassing when I've been acting as though I had everything figured out.

Phydios wrote:

Australian Republic wrote:So what's your issue about, specifically?

What do you mean? We aren't drafting anything here. We're gathering data on the newest published issue chain: a story about a scandal rocking your nation's government.

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:

Phydios wrote:What do you mean? We aren't drafting anything here. We're gathering data on the newest published issue chain: a story about a scandal rocking your nation's government.

Sorry, I'm afraid I don't quite understand this post.

I presume he just kinda laughed at Aussie. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯