NATION

PASSWORD

[ACCEPTED] Tempted By The Fruit Of Another

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:32 am

A Humanist Science wrote:Second option is meant to link small(er) government with pro-labor benefits (an underrepresented option, in my completely biased opinion), but at the cost of a weaker economy.


(I understand that the actual stats decisions are backroom deals and such. However, I wanted to clarify for the sake of making sure that the actual wording of the options reflect my intentions. :) )

Come to think of it, the cost of option two shouldn't really be a weaker economy, per se. This isn't a very good way to describe my intentions. An economy run according to the values of option two's speaker probably would be "weaker" in the sense of lower absolute/overall return -- but only because the average worker has less to initially invest.

Perhaps to help illustrate what I mean, take a look at A Humanist Science's ranking and stats. It has a "Thriving" economy and an "impressive" average income, although it is by no means the richest nation. I think what distinguishes it is the fact that it's growth in average income of the poor that is largely driving its economic growth. The NS economic cliches seem to be pairing stupidly high average income with stupidly high income inequality, OR paring stupidly high income equality with stupidly low average income. AHS, by contrast, pursues a stupidly high average income with low income equality. It's the bottom-up "rising tide lifts all boats" approach, rather than the "hope a bit trickles down" approach (this latter approach being captured by options one and three).

TL;DR - the stats effects for option two should move a nation towards the "rising tide lifts all boats" economy, as described above. The effect shouldn't be just to reduce economic output, but to shift economic output towards reflecting a more egalitarian distribution. Nothing says absurd profits cannot be distributed in an egalitarian fashion (except, maybe, the option one and three speakers). And yes, my overt and unashamed goal here is to bias NS with an anti-government, pro-market, pro-labor issue option for once :D
Last edited by A Humanist Science on Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:35 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:08 am

Gnejs wrote:Love the turtleneck, by the way.


A small tribute to a dyed-in-the-turtleneck Marxist sociology professor I once had. :D

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:16 pm

Fifth draft. Changed option one speaker into a "majority shareholder" and changed up the nature of the factory in question a bit so as to allow for a greater variety of fruit-related puns. Also changed the name of the original company to "@@ANIMAL@@ Farm," for some extra meta-punnery.

User avatar
Gnejs
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 3181
Founded: May 11, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Gnejs » Sat Oct 08, 2016 3:25 am

It's beautiful, well done.

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Sat Oct 08, 2016 9:00 pm

Gnejs wrote:It's beautiful, well done.


:D

Sixth draft; slight reduction in wordiness, and two fruit/veg puns per speaker. Also, obvious "got the plums" joke was obvious.

There's actually a dictionary of fruit-based idioms out there in the Googles. Fantastic.
Last edited by A Humanist Science on Sat Oct 08, 2016 9:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:44 am

Last bump before submission.

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:52 am

Submitted 10/13/2016.

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25677
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Thu Oct 13, 2016 3:42 am

Good luck
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
I would love to commission infrastructure in Australia. If anyone knows how I, as a lay person, could do so, please TG me. I'm dead serious
We're closer in time to 2050 than 1950

Wonderful Song Quotes

18 Published Issues, 1 Published WA Resolution

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:25 pm

Accepted as #615, 10/21/2016

Thanks Candlewhisper Archive!

User avatar
Drasnia
Minister
 
Posts: 2601
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Drasnia » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:38 pm

Congrats. I think this is your fastest one yet from drafting to publication.
See You Space Cowboy...

User avatar
A Humanist Science
Diplomat
 
Posts: 688
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby A Humanist Science » Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:47 pm

Drasnia wrote:Congrats. I think this is your fastest one yet from drafting to publication.


19 days total. :D

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25677
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:05 pm

Good luck!
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
I would love to commission infrastructure in Australia. If anyone knows how I, as a lay person, could do so, please TG me. I'm dead serious
We're closer in time to 2050 than 1950

Wonderful Song Quotes

18 Published Issues, 1 Published WA Resolution

User avatar
Australian rePublic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25677
Founded: Mar 18, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Australian rePublic » Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:06 pm

A Humanist Science wrote:Accepted as #615, 10/21/2016

Thanks Candlewhisper Archive!

Yeay
From Greek ancestry Orthodox Christian
I would love to commission infrastructure in Australia. If anyone knows how I, as a lay person, could do so, please TG me. I'm dead serious
We're closer in time to 2050 than 1950

Wonderful Song Quotes

18 Published Issues, 1 Published WA Resolution

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Democratic Poopland, Greater Europia, Isomedia, Life empire, Southland, United Provinces of Phoenix

Advertisement

Remove ads