by Mushet » Sun Mar 06, 2016 7:45 pm
by Ratateague » Sun Mar 06, 2016 7:52 pm
Mushet wrote:When the effect of "hearkening unto god" to stop the drought on another issue says tourists flock to the nation to see the famous raindances it actually lowers tourism.
by Luna Amore » Sun Mar 06, 2016 9:31 pm
Mushet wrote:Leaving the internet providers to run themselves in Broadband going to the birds raises taxes +0.22% and lowers freedom from taxation -0.15
Mushet wrote:When the effect of "hearkening unto god" to stop the drought on another issue says tourists flock to the nation to see the famous raindances it actually lowers tourism.
Ratateague wrote:Personally, I've encountered issue #017 (Corporations Demand Political Say), and choosing option 2 raises corruption. I can understand if regulation may be viewed as authoritarian in some way, but that is not necessarily synonymous with a green handshake. Especially, since the implication of raised corruption in response to option 2 is that the party would be securing it's power (assuming there is a party), but that's what option 3 already explicitly outlines.
by Ratateague » Sun Mar 06, 2016 9:55 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Not seeing that on the backend. Which nation and was it fairly recent?
by Drawkland » Sun Mar 06, 2016 10:04 pm
United Dalaran wrote:Goddammit, comrade. I just knew that someday some wild, capitalist, imperialist interstellar empire will swallow our country.CN on the RMB wrote:drawkland's leader has survived so many assassination attempts that I am fairly certain he is fidel castro in disguise
by Luna Amore » Sun Mar 06, 2016 10:11 pm
by Ratateague » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:46 am
Luna Amore wrote:Ratateague wrote:This one. Not too recent, no, but since the change.
Still not seeing it. Your nation is already so unbelievably incorruptible that changes are going to be hard to come by for you in that stat period.
Neither of your Corruption or Compliance graphs show a change at all. If there was a change, it would have had to be extremely minute and due to how on the fringe you are corruption-wise.
by Leppikania » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:49 am
Following new legislation in Pyrocynical, 8 year olds can be seen lighting up in public areas.
by Luna Amore » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:08 am
Leppikania wrote:In Pyrocynical, making smoking legal decreased recreational drug use. By a lot. This makes even less sense with the effect line:Following new legislation in Pyrocynical, 8 year olds can be seen lighting up in public areas.
by Mushet » Mon Mar 07, 2016 3:08 pm
by Mushet » Mon Mar 07, 2016 3:42 pm
by Luna Amore » Mon Mar 07, 2016 4:04 pm
Mushet wrote:My puppet Teshum chose the same issue and it didn't raise the crime rate, weird.
But when I chose to expand the freeway system with that nation instead of public transport public transport was raised +11.9%.
by Mushet » Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:13 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Mushet wrote:My puppet Teshum chose the same issue and it didn't raise the crime rate, weird.
But when I chose to expand the freeway system with that nation instead of public transport public transport was raised +11.9%.
Different strokes for differentfolksnations.
Can't respond to the second one without an issue number.
by Skappola » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:53 pm
by Luna Amore » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:09 pm
Skappola wrote:I just had an issue called the "Long and Winding halls of %[CAPITAL]%." I chose option two, which involved gutting government spending. This resulted in every one of my industries increasing substantially, but the employment, economy, and economic output all fell. My economy fell from a 100 to a 98! It's completely nonsensical! Why would cutting taxes in half cause my economy to drop but all of my industries to skyrocket?
by Ratateague » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:24 pm
Skappola wrote:I just had an issue called the "Long and Winding halls of %[CAPITAL]%." I chose option two, which involved gutting government spending. This resulted in every one of my industries increasing substantially, but the employment, economy, and economic output all fell. My economy fell from a 100 to a 98! It's completely nonsensical! Why would cutting taxes in half cause my economy to drop but all of my industries to skyrocket?
by [violet] » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:24 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Skappola wrote:I just had an issue called the "Long and Winding halls of %[CAPITAL]%." I chose option two, which involved gutting government spending. This resulted in every one of my industries increasing substantially, but the employment, economy, and economic output all fell. My economy fell from a 100 to a 98! It's completely nonsensical! Why would cutting taxes in half cause my economy to drop but all of my industries to skyrocket?
The industry bumps are a quirk (not a bug) of the new system. There was a potential correction in the works in beta, but it ended up causing more problems than it solved.
The drop in the economy is pretty understandable. You gutted your government.
by [violet] » Mon Mar 07, 2016 10:28 pm
Mushet wrote:Leaving the internet providers to run themselves in Broadband going to the birds raises taxes +0.22% and lowers freedom from taxation -0.15%
by Trotterdam » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:47 pm
No, option one involved gutting government spending. Option two involved spending more money on figuring out where you're spending too much money.Skappola wrote:I just had an issue called the "Long and Winding halls of %[CAPITAL]%." I chose option two, which involved gutting government spending.
by Daoine pacaiste » Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:26 am
by Annihilators of Chan Island » Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:56 am
by [violet] » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:07 pm
Daoine pacaiste wrote:So for a long time I was a fully socilist state which was fun, but eventually I got a issue that allowed me to legalize some private industry(turned out to be about 35%) mostly because a lot of the issues are based around private industry and I was getting them in a socilist state and it was breaking my immersion.
So anyway this turned out pretty good and gave my economy a big boost which was good.
Getting to the point, the weird thing that happens was that my employment dropped out of nowhere when I did this by over half. So my economy grew greatly but employment drops? And income equality actually stayed about the same.
by Ratateague » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:13 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Ratateague wrote:This one. Not too recent, no, but since the change.
Still not seeing it. Your nation is already so unbelievably incorruptible that changes are going to be hard to come by for you in that stat period.
Neither of your Corruption or Compliance graphs show a change at all. If there was a change, it would have had to be extremely minute and due to how on the fringe you are corruption-wise.
by Nuevo Meshiko » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:15 pm
Ratateague wrote:Luna Amore wrote:Still not seeing it. Your nation is already so unbelievably incorruptible that changes are going to be hard to come by for you in that stat period.
Neither of your Corruption or Compliance graphs show a change at all. If there was a change, it would have had to be extremely minute and due to how on the fringe you are corruption-wise.
Yep. Corruption definitely increases. Lyssenlik just answered the issue, Corruption went up by 7.1%. And I'm sure I chose the right option: "2 minutes ago: Following new legislation in Lyssenlik, political parties are banned from advertising and receiving private donations. "
Rothuria wrote:Too Socialist.
Northern Arcadian Empire wrote:Spanish is very rusty but, "God we thank" they thank God for everything?
Floydian Britannia wrote:The Caliphate of Cordoba
Xaolan wrote:Some sort of a Latin empire?
Yalos wrote:Rich
Inolena wrote:Muslim Mexicans with a love for freedom and good food
Inolena wrote:A sensual Latin lover. With a cellphone. Listening to prayers and some Sufi music.
by Leppikania » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:17 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement