NATION

PASSWORD

[SUBMITTED] A Working Class Hero Is Something To Be

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Golgothastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1237
Founded: Mar 26, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

[SUBMITTED] A Working Class Hero Is Something To Be

Postby Golgothastan » Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:59 am

A while back we were discussing the lack of issues for nations with planned/command economies, despite some issues allowing nations to adopt such a system, so this is one attempt at one.
    Name

    A Working Class Hero Is Something To Be

    Description

    The quarterly production reports show that a worker from North @@NAME@@, Alenyo Stackemup, has mined more unobtainium ore than all the other workers in his district combined, leading to questions about how the state should recognise such industriousness.

    Validity

    Nation has chosen an issue adopting a planned economy or has 0% private industry. Whatever makes sense for the issue.

    Options

    [option]"Comrade Stackemup is truly setting a fine example to the workers of @@NAME@@!" enthuses the Minister for Industry, @@RANDOMNAME@@. "Clearly, we should be rewarding such commitment to the cause. If we increase his ration allowance, and give him a nicer state apartment to live in, the other workers will be motivated to match his output. Once word spreads, the mines will be humming. It'll be the dawn of a new age of economic productivity!"
    [effect]tired miners jealously watch as their harder working colleagues are rewarded with cushy perks
    [stats]Economy (mining industry) increases, economic freedoms increase slightly, equality decreases, people become more hardworking, corruption increases, happiness decreases

    [option]"You're forgetting the ideals that first led to us adopting a planned economy," interjects the rather more dour and ideologically rigid Minister for Resources, @@RANDOMNAME@@. "From each according to his ability - to each according to his NEED. Comrade Stackemup doesn't need any more rations than any other worker, and contributing to the country should be its own reward. Giving special treatment to workers who produce more will lead us down the slippery slope back to capitalist exploitation."
    [effect]every worker receives exactly the same pay regardless of how much they've actually done
    [stats]Economy (mining industry) decreases, economic freedoms decrease slightly, equality increases, people become less hardworking, happiness increases

    [option]"I actually think we have a bigger problem than that," says the perpetually suspicious Minister for Internal Affairs, @@RANDOMNAME@@. "Have you really looked at the numbers his manager has claimed? According to their report, Stackemup's production level was OVER 9000! That's just not possible: no one could humanly shift that much unobtainium. They're obviously falsifying the data. We need to eliminate such corruption with a thorough audit of the whole sector, and in the meantime, don't go making an example of Stackemup and his supposed achievements: we'll all end up embarrassing ourselves."
    [effect]it is impossible to get any work done as auditors swarm every inch of government factories and mines
    [stats]Economy (mining industry) decreases significantly, economic freedoms decrease, corruption decreases, Administration increases, government size increase, tax increases, crime decreases

    [option]"Maybe we should make an example of him!" fumes the Minister for Justice, @@RANDOMNAME@@. "But instead of a nice new apartment, let's give him a nice cold prison cell! Or, if he's really such a hard worker, then I'm sure he won't mind reporting to the labour camps for, shall we say, ten years? Anyone who lies about their production quotas is a traitor to @@NAME@@ and an enemy of the people! With your permission, we should install undercover commissars in every factory to report back on any such obvious treason."
    [effect]miners are commonly hauled off to the gulags for the crime of "working too hard"
    [stats]corruption decreases significantly, crime decreases significantly, authoritarianism increases, Administration increases, Law & Order increases, tax increases, government size increases, political & economic freedoms decrease, people become more hardworking
Last edited by Golgothastan on Tue Mar 24, 2015 7:46 am, edited 5 times in total.

User avatar
Lenyo
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7630
Founded: May 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lenyo » Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:30 am

I like this draft. (Huge surprise, I know.) But I'd recommend cutting option #4. It doesn't add anything to the issue that wasn't in option #3, and #3 is funnier and less insane.
The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular
representatives of the oppressing class shall represent and repress them in parliament.

Lenin, State and Revolution (1917)

User avatar
Sedgistan
Senior Issues Moderator
 
Posts: 33757
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:34 am

Can't stand to have anything too negative about commies, eh? :P

User avatar
Lenyo
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7630
Founded: May 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lenyo » Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:40 am

Sedgistan wrote:Can't stand to have anything too negative about commies, eh? :P

I'm transparent.
The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular
representatives of the oppressing class shall represent and repress them in parliament.

Lenin, State and Revolution (1917)

User avatar
Golgothastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1237
Founded: Mar 26, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Golgothastan » Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:45 am

For those who don't catch the "Stackemup" reference: it's based on Aleksei Stakhanov.
Lenyo wrote:I like this draft. (Huge surprise, I know.) But I'd recommend cutting option #4. It doesn't add anything to the issue that wasn't in option #3, and #3 is funnier and less insane.

Fair enough. Someone - possibly Fris or Sedge - once told me my issues weren't extreme enough. Getting the balance right is proving rather delicate!
Last edited by Golgothastan on Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Senior Issues Moderator
 
Posts: 33757
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:04 am

I was actually fine with the 4th option...

User avatar
Lenyo
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7630
Founded: May 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lenyo » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:10 am

Sedgistan wrote:I was actually fine with the 4th option...

>:(
The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide which particular
representatives of the oppressing class shall represent and repress them in parliament.

Lenin, State and Revolution (1917)

User avatar
Golgothastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1237
Founded: Mar 26, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Golgothastan » Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:27 am

For now I'm going to leave Option #4 in; it's up to the editors to decide whether to snip out an option later on.

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5741
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:59 pm

I'm fine with #4 too, for what it's worth.

Regarding the references to "the Party" and "collectives" and all that jazz - the commie RP aspect is fun, but wouldn't other types of governments have state-run economies as well? Fascists, for instance?
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Golgothastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1237
Founded: Mar 26, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Golgothastan » Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:18 pm

That's a reasonable objection. I've changed the wording to make it a bit more neutral on that front.

User avatar
Sierra Lyricalia
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 4312
Founded: Nov 29, 2008
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Sierra Lyricalia » Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:00 pm

I can see this coming up in nations with more than 0% private industry; like, what if your agriculture, energy, heavy manufacturing, and steel industries are all either government bureaus or state-owned companies, but you leave your much smaller beverage producers, basket weavers, and tourism/hospitality folks to do their thing? Maybe a 25%-30% cutoff for "size of private sector" makes more sense.
Principal-Agent, Anarchy; Squadron Admiral, The Red Fleet
The Semi-Honorable Leonid Berkman Pavonis
Author: 354 GA / Issues 436, 451, 724
Ambassador Pro Tem
Tech Level: Complicated (or not: 7/0/6 i.e. 12) / RP Details
.
Jerk, Ideological Deviant, Roach, MT Army stooge, & "red [who] do[es]n't read" (various)
.
Illustrious Bum #279


User avatar
Golgothastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1237
Founded: Mar 26, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Golgothastan » Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:46 am

Sierra Lyricalia wrote:I can see this coming up in nations with more than 0% private industry; like, what if your agriculture, energy, heavy manufacturing, and steel industries are all either government bureaus or state-owned companies, but you leave your much smaller beverage producers, basket weavers, and tourism/hospitality folks to do their thing? Maybe a 25%-30% cutoff for "size of private sector" makes more sense.

To be honest the stat aspect of the validity isn't something I'm really sure about. The point is simply that there has to be a substantial enough state owned industry; what the specifics are, I think will have to be left for the judgement of the editors.

User avatar
Golgothastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1237
Founded: Mar 26, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Golgothastan » Thu Mar 19, 2015 5:22 am

I've added a first pass at some stats.


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads