[DRAFT] Deadly candy

[Kulmi Nation]

Name: Deadly candy

Validity: Nations with high economy

Description: An innocent child suffocated after eating a chocolate egg with a toy inside.

[option] "These must be banned!" demands @@RANDOMFEMALENAME@@, the childs mother. Toys inside of food? This is a danger for all @@DEMONYMNOUNPLURAL@@ and their kids! How many will have to die before this hazard will be removed? Make @@NAME@@ safer!
[effect] candies are being strictly regulated.
[stats] obesity goes down, civil rights go down, happiness goes down, unexpected death rate goes down, economy goes down

[option] "This will impact our economy!" claims @@RANDOMNAME@@, CEO of CoolCandy Inc. "We can't just outlaw something because of one single death! Accidents happen. If anything, we should support creative candies like this. If we receive a little funding from the government, we can expand our company! What's a dead kid or two if our economy thrives‽
[effect] reports of children suffocating on toys in their food have risen rapidly.
[stats] obesity goes up, happiness goes up, unexpected death rate goes up, economy goes up

[option] "It's not just those type of candy." says health advocat @@RANDOMNAME@@ while nibbling on a carrot. "Candies are bad for everyone's health! We need to outlaw them along with chocolate, sugar and other caries-causing foods! Do it for the health of our nation!"
[effect] candies are being smuggled into @@NAME@@.
[stats] unexpected death rate goes down, obesity goes down, civil rights go down, happiness goes down, economy goes down, health goes up

The stats on option three should have a greater impact than those of option one (in exchange for health up).

[Kaboomlandia]

I really think you need more of a blurb on the description. Also, is this something that would be taken to your leader?

[Annihilators of Chan Island]

I really think you need more of a blurb on the description. Also, is this something that would be taken to your leader?

I agree with the first half. Needs a bigger blurb. The bigger blurb will explain the second half, as to why this issue is being brought to the nation's leader.

[Kulmi Nation]

Maybe a series or multiple cases of this happening? I'll change it a bit and submit it.

[Eaischpnaeieacgkque Bhcieaghpodsttditf]

This is a very interesting issue. However, it seems like the validity would be for nations with high obesity not economy.

[Wolfenia]

This is a very interesting issue. However, it seems like the validity would be for nations with high obesity not economy.

Why not both? It makes little sense for countries under 20/100 in economy to have Kinder Eggs.

[Ephestus]

The second one. According to what I see here, the other two are more or less the same. If one or two kids dont die cause of the regulation, all the good stuff goes down. If people decide two deaths dont matter, everything goes up. I think its pretty self-explanatory.