Nation of Quebec wrote:Speaking on behalf of myself, I think a zombie themed issue would be fun.
#223 has that covered already.
Advertisement
by Trotterdam » Tue Sep 20, 2016 11:09 pm

by Lynopia » Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:30 am

by Drasnia » Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:34 am
Lynopia wrote:Although I am almost certain this is somewhere in a pinned thread, I haven't been able to find it so I will just this question.
Can we make an issue which deals with the consequences of choosing a particular issue, such as the International Incident one with Brasilistan?

by Lynopia » Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:37 am
I was not thinking about writing an international incidents issue, I will TG you more about my draft since I see that you are willing to helpDrasnia wrote:Lynopia wrote:Although I am almost certain this is somewhere in a pinned thread, I haven't been able to find it so I will just this question.
Can we make an issue which deals with the consequences of choosing a particular issue, such as the International Incident one with Brasilistan?
[ur=https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=8162365#p8162365l]This is probably what you're looking for.[/url]
I don't think any more issues are going to get added to the International Incident chain, but you can have an issue that chains off of another option.


by The Grim Reaper » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:18 am

by Trotterdam » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:01 pm
In my experience, shit does not, in fact, look cool.The Grim Reaper wrote:I recently found out that some countries have started issuing coloured commemorative coins, which look cool as shit.
The most coin-related issue we have right now is one about getting rid of pennies / 1-cent coins.The Grim Reaper wrote:Still need to trawl through the current issues for related topics, though. It seems like the sort of thing that would have been covered by now, but perhaps it's a niche issue.

by Froiiland » Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:55 pm

by Dotangina » Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:03 pm

by A Humanist Science » Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:59 pm
Nation of Quebec wrote:
- Dealing with aspects of a socialist/communist system - centralised vs. decentralised economic planning, electing/appointing managers/officers,
autarky.

by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:48 am
Dotangina wrote:Is there a feedback thread for submitted issues that were ultimately rejected? I've been wondering whether the issues I've written up and submitted are still under consideration or have been thrown into the dumpster behind the supermarket.

by Drasnia » Mon Oct 03, 2016 1:27 pm
by Trotterdam » Mon Oct 03, 2016 2:17 pm
This should go in The Writer's Block, not here.Drasnia wrote:So, in my college writing class, we have been analyzing commencement speeches, so I thought to myself: "What if @@LEADER@@ were to do a commencement speech? That could be fun and give more personality to the character." So I have two ideas on how to approach the subject: Have a university dean invite you to speak, so your advisers tell you what to speak on (with the option not to speak as well); the other is have in the description the invitation and accepting the invitation, so the issue starts with @@LEADER@@ stepping up to the podium and the player is given a choice on what to have @@LEADER@@ say.
Which in your opinions is the better approach or is this even an acceptable issue idea?

by Drasnia » Mon Oct 03, 2016 3:59 pm
Trotterdam wrote:This should go in The Writer's Block, not here.Drasnia wrote:So, in my college writing class, we have been analyzing commencement speeches, so I thought to myself: "What if @@LEADER@@ were to do a commencement speech? That could be fun and give more personality to the character." So I have two ideas on how to approach the subject: Have a university dean invite you to speak, so your advisers tell you what to speak on (with the option not to speak as well); the other is have in the description the invitation and accepting the invitation, so the issue starts with @@LEADER@@ stepping up to the podium and the player is given a choice on what to have @@LEADER@@ say.
Which in your opinions is the better approach or is this even an acceptable issue idea?
Merely being invited is more consistent with NationStates's standard issue format. If you're already standing at the podium, it's harder to justify other characters giving you suggestions, so you'd have to write all the options as @@LEADER@@'s internal thought processes. Also, choosing not to speak could simply be dismissing the issue (unless it's something like, say, deciding that national security requires the government to never speak to anyone about anything).
Make sure not to imply that @@LEADER@@ is only just coming into power.

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:56 pm
by Trotterdam » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:39 am
That sounds like an excellent reason to dismiss the issue.United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:Recently I've been thinking about a new issue chain that'd evolve around a stock market crash that'd randomly lower someone's economy rating in a nation with high levels of economic freedom (only if they don't dismiss the issue, of course),

by United Provinces of Atlantica » Tue Oct 04, 2016 10:38 am
Trotterdam wrote:That sounds like an excellent reason to dismiss the issue.United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:Recently I've been thinking about a new issue chain that'd evolve around a stock market crash that'd randomly lower someone's economy rating in a nation with high levels of economic freedom (only if they don't dismiss the issue, of course),
In any economy-themed issue, it should be possible for your economy to not only endure but thrive if you choose the correct options. (And the options that do hurt the economy should have other benefits, so it's not simply a matter of looking up spoilers to avoid trap options.)
by Trotterdam » Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:20 pm
Seeing the problem coming and taking preventive measures?United Provinces of Atlantica wrote:I don't really see how it's possible to simulate immediately exiting the economic depression in the first issue.

by Nation of Quebec » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:11 pm

by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:09 am

by The Chan Islanders » Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:47 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Issue request:
Screening for Downs Syndrome.
There's new technologies now which allow for safe non invasive screening with a high degree of accuracy. Became aware of the ethical dimensions to this from watching a documentary yesterday, with the conflict between the parental choice to be able to screen for (and screen out) children with Downs Syndrome, against the Downs Syndrome community, their right to exist, and our definition of "illness".
If anyone can write a good quality issue on this subject, I'll be glad to edit and publish it.

by Viikate » Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:54 am

by The Blaatschapen » Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:21 am
Viikate wrote:I'm nowhere near fluent enough in English to actually write anything myself, but I thought of something that might be fun:
You know that conspiracy theory about how many of politicians and royalty are actually reptilian aliens in disguise? It'd be entertaining to have an issue that tackles that, but from the leader's perspective.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Unogonduria
Advertisement