Page 225 of 238

PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:09 pm
by SherpDaWerp
Are the powers-that-be still looking for a senate-reinstating issue? As per the first post:
Nation of Quebec wrote:
No Senate - Triggered by abolishing the upper house in 560. No reversal exists. High priority: An issue that reinstates the upper house.

It seems like an interesting concept that I could work with, while also being kinda structured for me to get started in issue writing...

PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 11:11 pm
by Great Nortend
Something like legislation passed with lots of basic errors—need upper house to review. Options with hereditary upper house, appointed upper house, elected upper house?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:23 am
by Candlewhisper Archive
The requests list on that post was up to date apart from the "no courts" reversal, which was closed recently. So yes, we still need an upper house reinstatement issue.

Have amended and re-dated the post.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:44 pm
by Australian rePublic
Who'se gonna maintain the big spoiler list, now that Jutsa's out of action?

PostPosted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 7:24 pm
by Australian rePublic
Are there any issues titled "It's all Greek to me"

If not, this is a place holder for that title, I have an issie idea, but need to work out the details

PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:20 am
by SherpDaWerp
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:So yes, we still need an upper house reinstatement issue.

I might try and base one off this bill which almost passed in indiana.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 1:13 am
by Candlewhisper Archive
SherpDaWerp wrote:
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:So yes, we still need an upper house reinstatement issue.

I might try and base one off this bill which almost passed in indiana.


I know the bill. I've drafted an issue based on it. :)

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=437999

PostPosted: Tue Jun 25, 2019 6:53 pm
by Jutsa
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:The requests list on that post was up to date apart from the "no courts" reversal, which was closed recently. So yes, we still need an upper house reinstatement issue.

Have amended and re-dated the post.


oh my gosh it was? *sudden pangs of sorrow for ignoring this pIace for so Iong that this actuaIIy happened*

PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 6:27 pm
by Jutsa
We got an issue like this yet? :P

Come to think of it, John Oliver presents a lot of interesting issue ideas honesty, like rent skyrocketing on mobile homes and such

PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2019 7:59 pm
by Australian rePublic
Jutsa wrote:We got an issue like this yet? :P

Come to think of it, John Oliver presents a lot of interesting issue ideas honesty, like rent skyrocketing on mobile homes and such

Don't know. F€€king regional filter. How has Google not realised that VPNs exist?

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 9:33 pm
by Australian rePublic
Any issues about babies who were Switched at Birth?

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 10:50 am
by Earthbound Immortal Squad
.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 4:45 am
by Devil Heart
Have we issues about local complementary currencies? Like the Brixton pound?
Not sure how I want to 'issueize', but would like to if this hasn't already been done.
There are lots of possibilities :)

PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 1:16 pm
by Krogon
Got a Dogman issue today and it inspired me. Would an issue where Dogman dies and @@LEADER@@ is forced to choose who the new Dogman is work?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 2:32 pm
by Australian rePublic
Krogon wrote:Got a Dogman issue today and it inspired me. Would an issue where Dogman dies and @@LEADER@@ is forced to choose who the new Dogman is work?

I'd assume it's just the next person to wear the cape. That, or a different vigilante would take over. If we have dogman, then we would probs have hundreds of other vigilantes too. If one dies, then there's probs hundreds of other superherp wannabes to take his place. And I don't think that the nickname would matter

PostPosted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 2:42 pm
by Trotterdam
The entire point of vigilantes is that they aren't appointed by the government.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 3:13 am
by Australian rePublic
Ah crap! I forgot the issue I wanted to write :(

PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 5:13 pm
by Chan Island
Australian rePublic wrote:Ah crap! I forgot the issue I wanted to write :(


Do you still want that idea I gave you about how the people living on small islands are facing rising sea levels and climate change?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:17 pm
by Australian rePublic
Chan Island wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:Ah crap! I forgot the issue I wanted to write :(


Do you still want that idea I gave you about how the people living on small islands are facing rising sea levels and climate change?

Yea, sure, why not

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:09 am
by Australian rePublic
Stay tuned everyone, I'm writing an issue based on a 95 clip from a 1990's children's TV show. Here's the clip in question:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ltG37Bbx1qk


Also, @Chan Islands, I am still interested in your idea about global warming and islands. I just need more time for research and structuring, plus my life outside of NS

PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 1:21 am
by Chan Island
Eh, don't worry about it mate. :)


Struggling a bit with what to do with the Punch to the Capital issue. On the one hand, having it be more about a hostile foreign power pointing missiles at the capital would be interesting, but would both no longer make the title work and draws away from the original "Blitz" issue idea it's going for. On the other hand, it opens it up for a lot more players.

In addition, not sure if I'm sure about having it be cruise missiles. Perhaps in the original I ought to have stressed that the squadron of drones were just on a bombing run, not a suicide mission, but that would have implied terrible defences in a demographic who larp as very warlike already so big red X.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:18 pm
by Australian rePublic
I want to revive some of my old drafts, but I want to know how far bac player submitted issues go before I do so. Are there any player submitted issues sitting in the "Yes" pile as far back as October 2018, or do I need to redraft these?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 6:01 am
by Bears Armed
Australian rePublic wrote:I want to revive some of my old drafts, but I want to know how far back player submitted issues go before I do so. Are there any player submitted issues sitting in the "Yes" pile as far back as October 2018, or do I need to redraft these?

One of the editors recently told another enquirer that the pool of player-submitted issue drafts now contains nothing from before January 2019.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 8:38 am
by Earthbound Immortal Squad
I am looking into an issue idea based around surrogacy and I was wondering if there was any other issues out there based on this? (Excluding #785 Born to be my baby)

PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 4:47 pm
by Pogaria
Bears Armed wrote:
Australian rePublic wrote:I want to revive some of my old drafts, but I want to know how far back player submitted issues go before I do so. Are there any player submitted issues sitting in the "Yes" pile as far back as October 2018, or do I need to redraft these?

One of the editors recently told another enquirer that the pool of player-submitted issue drafts now contains nothing from before January 2019.

Actually, there are some older issues hiding in the murky depths of the pool... but none of them appear to have been written by Aussie.