Advertisement
by Australian rePublic » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:01 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:27 am
by Australian rePublic » Thu Jan 03, 2019 4:46 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Probably not, but it could be something that is mentioned in an issue that touches on related subjects.
What story were you thinking of for such an issue?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:15 am
by Mzeusia » Thu Jan 03, 2019 6:09 am
Mzeusia wrote:I'm thinking more about the ancient history of nations, because most of the issues I receive are to do with modern problems. What about an issue where something (maybe a statue of a famous ancient figure) gets desecrated. The solutions could be something like teaching people about the history, abandoning the history for more modern ways, abandoning modernism for a more primitive life-style.
Thanks.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:29 am
by Trotterdam » Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:32 am
#701 is about an old statue, though not an ancient one (just two centuries ago).Mzeusia wrote:I'm thinking more about the ancient history of nations, because most of the issues I receive are to do with modern problems. What about an issue where something (maybe a statue of a famous ancient figure) gets desecrated. The solutions could be something like teaching people about the history, abandoning the history for more modern ways, abandoning modernism for a more primitive life-style.
by Jutsa » Thu Jan 03, 2019 9:02 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:We're not in need of a new editor right now, and if we were, we know who we'd be asking already. And no, not going to say.
It is a nice way to generate issue submissions, and the Player Submission pile is at an all time low (69 player-written issues, to 147 staff-written issues, which is why you're seeing such a high proportion of issues by staff being published right now) so it's worth considering, but right now running a contest probably isn't a good use of staff time.
The nature of issue authoring is that you tend to have a lot of submissions and a lot of would be authors, but most of the quality output comes from a small pool of quality writers. The trick here is getting those quality writers to stay active, and to find the next few quality writers.
by Australian rePublic » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:55 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Possibly you could do a broader issue about the unreliability of witnesses and memory.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... s-have-it/
by Trotterdam » Fri Jan 04, 2019 6:53 pm
by Jutsa » Fri Jan 04, 2019 7:00 pm
by The Sakhalinsk Empire » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:14 am
by The Free Joy State » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:24 am
The Sakhalinsk Empire wrote:Issue #897 "The Devil's Playground" - Option 3 mentions "...your niece, clambering into the backseat of your car." but this nation bans cars.
by Kurnugia » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:10 pm
by Trotterdam » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:36 pm
I don't quite get what you mean by "brandalism", but for intellectual property issues, see #473, #500, and #85. (Also #340 and #603, the followups.)Kurnugia wrote:Is there an Issue about brandalism?
My thinking is for the premise:
A free speech capitalist nation needs to decide if this is free speech or blatant infringement on intellectual property.
by The Sakhalinsk Empire » Sat Jan 05, 2019 7:49 pm
Trotterdam wrote:I don't quite get what you mean by "brandalism", but for intellectual property issues, see #473, #500, and #85. (Also #340 and #603, the followups.)Kurnugia wrote:Is there an Issue about brandalism?
My thinking is for the premise:
A free speech capitalist nation needs to decide if this is free speech or blatant infringement on intellectual property.
Also #859 is about brand names, if that's what you meant.
by Trotterdam » Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:17 am
by The Sakhalinsk Empire » Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:23 am
by Australian rePublic » Sun Jan 06, 2019 3:50 am
by Sanctaria » Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:18 am
Australian rePublic wrote:As a follow up to option 583, how about an issue where Hare Krishners are confused as buskers?
by Mzeusia » Sun Jan 06, 2019 8:04 am
by Jutsa » Sun Jan 06, 2019 9:01 am
We're moving away from referencing real-life faiths in the issue base. And I think Hare Krishners would be too close to Hare Krishnas for us to adopt. People would think we couldn't spell rather than assuming it's our in-universe version.
Could there be an issue (for democratic countries obviously) where an election is coming up, and the candidate (maybe the leader or may a local govt official) is worried about losing. Then there can be a discussion about various ways of either discrediting all opponents, getting rid of democracy or making your party's candidate seem better.
Also, if this is will not work for whatever reason, there is no need to provide links to other issues to say that it overlaps. I don't need evidence.
Thanks for your help.
by Mzeusia » Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:10 pm
by Jutsa » Sun Jan 06, 2019 4:34 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement