NationStates

Is there an issue to legalise zoos yet?

Technically yes, although a proper reversal is much desired.

Thing is, it's apparently kinda hard coming up with a zoo reversal idea.

I've actually got one waiting in my back wings... maybe I should post it while I work on some of the others.
(Honestly it's not my favorite draft though so you'll probably be safe writing something yourself if you're interested.)

Jutsa wrote:Technically yes, although a proper reversal is much desired.

Thing is, it's apparently kinda hard coming up with a zoo reversal idea.

I've actually got one waiting in my back wings... maybe I should post it while I work on some of the others.
(Honestly it's not my favorite draft though so you'll probably be safe writing something yourself if you're interested.)

Alrighty.
I’ll go do that thing.

Would an issue for socialist nations about what kind of art to sell be an interesting issue idea?

I assue you mean "make", not "sell"?

Make and sell, really. An option could hypothetically allow the creation of some art but forbid the selling of it.

Course, such an option could not be an option 3 "compromise" and would probably be a better option 1.

Thoughts on such?

For monetization of art in communist countries, compare #920.

For government judgement on what art deserves funding, compare #1043.

You're probably better off trying for some angle other than money, if you want to tread new ground.

Trotterdam wrote:For monetization of art in communist countries, compare #920.

For government judgement on what art deserves funding, compare #1043.

You're probably better off trying for some angle other than money, if you want to tread new ground.

Whether the government there should promote innovation -- and thus help to bring in foreign 'hard' currency -- by letting inventors have some of the money raised by selling (or licencing production of) their inventions abroad? (I seem to recall reading that Hungary, which admittedly didn't have the most 'communist' government out of the Comecon nations by that point, was relatively generous to Rubik...)

I'll leave that to someone else in. I've not had the best of luck in my ventures into communism.

Or my ventures into capitalism, come to think of it.

Is there an issue about one of your nation's satellite states trying to distance themselves from your nation?
I know that there are issues concerning other nations becoming aggressively anti-YN, but I was thinking of something more along the lines of Yugoslavia attempting to leave the Soviet sphere instead of just "this nation is starting to dislike you more".

Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:Is there an issue about one of your nation's satellite states trying to distance themselves from your nation?
I know that there are issues concerning other nations becoming aggressively anti-YN, but I was thinking of something more along the lines of Yugoslavia attempting to leave the Soviet sphere instead of just "this nation is starting to dislike you more".

We have issues where part of your nation wants you out of their hair -- wants to secede, wants more local autonomy, etc. Having it be a satellite country instead of a province isn't different enough to feel fresh, at least for me.

Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:Is there an issue about one of your nation's satellite states trying to distance themselves from your nation?
I know that there are issues concerning other nations becoming aggressively anti-YN, but I was thinking of something more along the lines of Yugoslavia attempting to leave the Soviet sphere instead of just "this nation is starting to dislike you more".

There are a handful where the government of a friendly country seems like it will change, in a way that won't be good for your international influence, but none with a quite explicit puppet nation. You'd have to think about all of the ones about secession in order to get something sufficiently different though.

Would an issue centered around the disparity of road quality between Rural/Urban infrastructure be considered to run afoul of the more generalized #142?

For nations in which Gambling is banned, an issue about Gambling Ships that are placed just outside territorial waters: Possibly viable?

lol, yes, that sounds good.

An issue about gambling outside of the nation has been proposed before, and I personally feel that would better be
an issue about breaking the law in general outside of your nation and in another.
However, I do think this one's circumstances are unique enough to be warranted it being specifically for gambling.
(Or possibly booze, but still, gambling works)

Bears Armed wrote:For nations in which Gambling is banned, an issue about Gambling Ships that are placed just outside territorial waters: Possibly viable?

That was something I thought of writing about, but never got around to actually doing it. If you want to draft something, go for it.

In case anyone needs a new issue idea:
http://time.com/5466375/dutch-church-service-immigrant-deportation/

Pogaria wrote:In case anyone needs a new issue idea:
http://time.com/5466375/dutch-church-service-immigrant-deportation/

I started drafting one on this topic yesteday.

Any issues about kneww defenders

USS Monitor wrote:

Bears Armed wrote:For nations in which Gambling is banned, an issue about Gambling Ships that are placed just outside territorial waters: Possibly viable?

That was something I thought of writing about, but never got around to actually doing it. If you want to draft something, go for it.

I've started putting ideas together, hope to have a draft up in the next few days. Working title = 'Casino Ahoy!'

Australian rePublic wrote:Any issues about kneww defenders

Aussie, what is a "kneww defender"?

EDIT: Do you mean "knee defender"? If so, we don't... but I'm not sure I see an issue of national importance that could be made out of "do people have the right to recline their seat or not"...

The Free Joy State wrote:

Australian rePublic wrote:Any issues about kneww defenders

Aussie, what is a "kneww defender"?

EDIT: Do you mean "knee defender"? If so, we don't... but I'm not sure I see an issue of national importance that could be made out of "do people have the right to recline their seat or not"...

It was important enough for some countries to make specific legislation regarding it

Any issues on money laundering yet?

Australian rePublic wrote:

The Free Joy State wrote:Aussie, what is a "kneww defender"?

EDIT: Do you mean "knee defender"? If so, we don't... but I'm not sure I see an issue of national importance that could be made out of "do people have the right to recline their seat or not"...

It was important enough for some countries to make specific legislation regarding it

Which countries? I've found that some airlines have policies about them...

The Sakhalinsk Empire wrote:Any issues on money laundering yet?

I don't believe so.

The Free Joy State wrote:

Australian rePublic wrote:It was important enough for some countries to make specific legislation regarding it

Which countries? I've found that some airlines have policies about them...

The Sakhalinsk Empire wrote:Any issues on money laundering yet?

I don't believe so.

Yes!!!

You will be expecting Gabriel Hattone very shortly